Jump to content

  

7 members have voted

  1. 1. Can Rand Paul shatter the traditional right-left divide and construct a brand new coalition of voters on this issue?

    • Yes. With the era of "the internet of things" at our doorstep, it is time for a national conversation on privacy. The old political models no longer apply.
    • No. Right and left will continue to have meaning in a country that still cares about issues like abortion and affirmative action and taxes. Privacy can take a number.


61 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: Timeline
Posted

Libertarians, and Rand Paul specifically, are wishy-washy when it comes to Federal Civil Rights so that means no African American votes or really any group that is protected by such laws.

Not necessarily true, because that war has been fought and won. The window of opportunity white people had to "take it back" is now closed.

Filed: Timeline
Posted

Not necessarily true, because that war has been fought and won. The window of opportunity white people had to "take it back" is now closed.

The war may have been won, but the fight continues.

The GOP and their voter id laws, cutting back on voting times, and creating a lot of road blocks to prevent people from voting is evidence enough that their window of opportunity to take it back is still open.

Filed: Timeline
Posted

The war may have been won, but the fight continues.

The GOP and their voter id laws, cutting back on voting times, and creating a lot of road blocks to prevent people from voting is evidence enough that their window of opportunity to take it back is still open.

Naw. That stuff is small-fry. They can never have that level of privilege back. That's gone forever.

take what back?

Let me guess, you're a product of our public schools?

Posted

Naw. That stuff is small-fry. They can never have that level of privilege back. That's gone forever.

Let me guess, you're a product of our public school?

The privilege is still there, they just can't say it out loud anymore.

“Hate is too great a burden to bear. It injures the hater more than it injures the hated.” – Coretta Scott King

"Oppressive language does more than represent violence; it is violence; does more than represent the limits of knowledge; it limits knowledge." -Toni Morrison

He who passively accepts evil is as much involved in it as he who helps to perpetrate it.

Martin Luther King, Jr.

President-Obama-jpg.jpg

Posted

laughing.gif that tired azz myth again?

Don't worry, your card is still safe.

“Hate is too great a burden to bear. It injures the hater more than it injures the hated.” – Coretta Scott King

"Oppressive language does more than represent violence; it is violence; does more than represent the limits of knowledge; it limits knowledge." -Toni Morrison

He who passively accepts evil is as much involved in it as he who helps to perpetrate it.

Martin Luther King, Jr.

President-Obama-jpg.jpg

Posted

Not being able to say it loud anymore is evidence of severely eroded privilege. In some cases, non-existent privilege.

In other words, it's safe to come off the Democratic plantation now.

I really wish I could, but the GOP hasn't taken too kind to my people.

“Hate is too great a burden to bear. It injures the hater more than it injures the hated.” – Coretta Scott King

"Oppressive language does more than represent violence; it is violence; does more than represent the limits of knowledge; it limits knowledge." -Toni Morrison

He who passively accepts evil is as much involved in it as he who helps to perpetrate it.

Martin Luther King, Jr.

President-Obama-jpg.jpg

Filed: Timeline
Posted

I really wish I could, but the GOP hasn't taken too kind to my people.

I'm coming around to the feeling either Jeb Bush or Rand Paul would be better for PoC than Hillary would be. Neither of those two will preside over a return to the days of Jim Crow or slavery. But either of those two will do a lot for privacy and other 21st century concerns while that old 60s radical Hillary would be stuck fighting the old battles of her youth.

Claiming that I have any privilege because I'm white is about as meaningful as claiming that people get free stuff because they voted for Obama.

You don't. Well, not enough of it to be meaningful anymore. Your ancestors, if they were American, did. But you? You're out of luck and have the Civil Rights Act and Presidents Kennedy and Johnson to thank for it.

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...