Jump to content

140 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: China
Timeline
Posted

Helping the industrious and intelligent people of Ukraine travel more freely and expand their horizons would increase their understanding of the modern world and true democracy and solidify their opposition to kleptocratic rulers such as Putin.

Repeat for emphasis:

Already done, this century, into Europe and into SE Asia.

Already Done !

Sometimes my language usage seems confusing - please feel free to 'read it twice', just in case !
Ya know, you can find the answer to your question with the advanced search tool, when using a PC? Ditch the handphone, come back later on a PC, and try again.

-=-=-=-=-=R E A D ! ! !=-=-=-=-=-

Whoa Nelly ! Want NVC Info? see http://www.visajourney.com/wiki/index.php/NVC_Process

Congratulations on your approval ! We All Applaud your accomplishment with Most Wonderful Kissies !

 

Filed: Timeline
Posted

A very poor application process. "B visas are adjudicated based on applicant interviews; the interviews generally last between 60 and 90 seconds.[55] Due to time constraints, adjudicators profile applicants.[55] Certain demographics, such as young adults, those who are single and/or unemployed, almost never receive visas.[55] Adjudicators are evaluated on how fast they carry out interviews, not the quality of adjudication decisions.[56] The validity of B visa decisions is not evaluated.[56] "

And? That's the reality the vast majority of people all over the world are up against. Seems to me that maybe perhaps the visa adjudication process could use some overhaul but this is not an argument to include a country that fails to meet the VWP benchmarks - by huge margins no less - into the program.

Filed: Other Country: United Kingdom
Timeline
Posted

A very poor application process. "B visas are adjudicated based on applicant interviews; the interviews generally last between 60 and 90 seconds.[55] Due to time constraints, adjudicators profile applicants.[55] Certain demographics, such as young adults, those who are single and/or unemployed, almost never receive visas.[55] Adjudicators are evaluated on how fast they carry out interviews, not the quality of adjudication decisions.[56] The validity of B visa decisions is not evaluated.[56] "

I'm not looking for sympathy - just passing along a suggestion that those who are interested in may like to see.

So instead of having a system where individuals are judged on their individual circumstances you want to give carte blanche to everyone.

Your idealism may be commendable but your logic is weak.

I say again, the US imposes strict criteria on a countries eligibility for the VWP.

Ukraine doesn't qualify. It's that simple.

Going by your argument, every country on Earth should have free travel.

August 2000: We start e-mailing. I'm in Bosnia, she's in Florida

October 29th 2000: She sends me e-mail asking if I would marry her

October 29th 2000(5 seconds later): I say yes

November 2000: She sends me tickets to Orlando for when I get back

December 6th 2000: Return from Bos

December 11th 2000: Fly to Orlando, she meets me at airport

December 22nd 2000: I fly back to UK

January 3rd 2001: She flies to UK (Good times)

Mid February 2001: Pregnancy test Positive

Mid February 2001: She flies back to US

March 2001: Miscarriage, I fly to US on first flight I can get

May 2001: I leave US before my 90 days are up

June 2001: I fly back to US, stopped at airport for questioning as I had only just left

September 2001: Pregnancy test Positive again

September 2001: She falls sick, I make decision to stay to look after her as I am afraid I may have problems getting back in.

April 16th 2002: Our son is born, we start getting stuff together for his passport

March 6th 2003: We leave US for UK as family

Early April 2003: Family troubles make her return to US, I ask Embassy in London about possibilities of returning to US

April 16th 2003: London Embassy informs me that I will be banned from the Visa Waiver Program for 10 years, my little boys first birthday

June 13th 2006: I-129f sent

August 11th 2006: NOA1 Recieved

After our relationship breaks down she admits to me that she had never bothered to start the application process

Filed: Timeline
Posted

For starters do not let anyone have a tourist visa for any longer than 3 weeks. That should be plenty. Now someone can get a tourist visa for 6 months, then get it extended for another 6 months, then apply for asylum.

But people who want to abuse the visa they received, don't care for how long they got it.

They just want to cross the border.

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Thailand
Timeline
Posted

Take a look at this forum:

http://www.visajourney.com/forums/forum/127-effects-of-major-family-changes-on-immigration-benefits/

I'm not saying Ukraine is the #1 offender, but it's up there on the list of countries where the immigrant gets here and then turns around and files a DV case and later a VAWA case. Some fo them are really blatant cases of visa fraud. Not only does the petitioner end up with a divorce, but a restraining order on his record for the rest of his life, whether they laid a hand on the person or not.

I think the OP is looking at the wrong villian here. It's not the U.S. govt, it's the folks in Ukraine (and other countries) that abuse tourist visas. I didn't get to see my wife in Thailand for over a year while this slow process worked it's way through. There's no way she would've gotten a tourist visa during that time, not because the U.S. govt. is some oppressive body picking on the poor folks of Thailand, but because there are alot of Thais that came to the U.S. on a tourist visas, and never left as they should have.

Trust me, I'm no fan of the U.S. govt., but in this case they're right. We have enough illegal immigrants here already. We don't need more.

You can click on the 'X' to the right to ignore this signature.

Filed: Timeline
Posted

People should make their own decisions within the law.

I agree.

But some people don't have a chance to make their own decisions, because some other people before them abused the law.

Did you bribe them with kielbasa? smile.png

Nope. Not all the consular officers in Poland like kiełbasa, Steve :P

And I'd never bribe any officials. Are you crazy? :lol:

Filed: Country: Monaco
Timeline
Posted

Please consider signing this petition.

https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/allow-ukrainian-citizens-90-day-entrance-usa-passport-without-visa/m0BDgkb5

7 countries in eastern Europe were added in 2008. This is one action that the US could take to support the Ukrainian people during this crisis.

I don't think your petition will be successful, but I will not be the one standing in its way. I will gladly sign it.

I commend your initiative, where so many nay-sayers would rather have you sitting on your hands.

200px-FSM_Logo.svg.png


www.ffrf.org




Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Ukraine
Timeline
Posted

So instead of having a system where individuals are judged on their individual circumstances you want to give carte blanche to everyone.

Your idealism may be commendable but your logic is weak.

I say again, the US imposes strict criteria on a countries eligibility for the VWP.

Ukraine doesn't qualify. It's that simple.

Going by your argument, every country on Earth should have free travel.

I guess I didn’t realize that the criteria is sacrosanct and should not be questioned. If you don’t agree then don’t sign the petition. It's that simple.

And? That's the reality the vast majority of people all over the world are up against. Seems to me that maybe perhaps the visa adjudication process could use some overhaul but this is not an argument to include a country that fails to meet the VWP benchmarks - by huge margins no less - into the program.

I agree and was not using that as an argument to include Ukraine in the VWP. There are other good reasons, as I stated earlier. I was just making that point in response to a question.

But people who want to abuse the visa they received, don't care for how long they got it.

They just want to cross the border.

At least they should become illegal and subject to enforcement after a few weeks instead of being legal for 6 months plus another 6 months then extended by a legal request for asylum.

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Ukraine
Timeline
Posted

Take a look at this forum:

http://www.visajourney.com/forums/forum/127-effects-of-major-family-changes-on-immigration-benefits/

I'm not saying Ukraine is the #1 offender, but it's up there on the list of countries where the immigrant gets here and then turns around and files a DV case and later a VAWA case. Some fo them are really blatant cases of visa fraud. Not only does the petitioner end up with a divorce, but a restraining order on his record for the rest of his life, whether they laid a hand on the person or not.

I think the OP is looking at the wrong villian here. It's not the U.S. govt, it's the folks in Ukraine (and other countries) that abuse tourist visas. I didn't get to see my wife in Thailand for over a year while this slow process worked it's way through. There's no way she would've gotten a tourist visa during that time, not because the U.S. govt. is some oppressive body picking on the poor folks of Thailand, but because there are alot of Thais that came to the U.S. on a tourist visas, and never left as they should have.

Trust me, I'm no fan of the U.S. govt., but in this case they're right. We have enough illegal immigrants here already. We don't need more.

Of course we don't need more illegal immigrants. We need more enforcement.

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Thailand
Timeline
Posted

Of course we don't need more illegal immigrants. We need more enforcement.

Agreed, but by implementing VWP in Ukraine, don't you think that would add to the numbers of illegal immigrants? People that come on VWP and don't leave?

You can click on the 'X' to the right to ignore this signature.

Posted

It is really expensive to deport people. Like $10K per person or something. It's more fiscally responsible to prevent fishy people from getting here than using taxpayer money to detain and deport them. Why should the US agree to pay $10K to deport people as a show of "solidarity"?

AOS for my husband
8/17/10: INTERVIEW DAY (day 123) APPROVED!!

ROC:
5/23/12: Sent out package
2/06/13: APPROVED!

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Ukraine
Timeline
Posted

Agreed, but by implementing VWP in Ukraine, don't you think that would add to the numbers of illegal immigrants? People that come on VWP and don't leave?

Yes, of course it would. The question is how many. There are a few bad apples in any bunch but I do not think the number would be significant. Ukrainians are proud of their country and not looking to escape.

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Ukraine
Timeline
Posted (edited)

It is really expensive to deport people. Like $10K per person or something. It's more fiscally responsible to prevent fishy people from getting here than using taxpayer money to detain and deport them. Why should the US agree to pay $10K to deport people as a show of "solidarity"?

There are probably no fishy people in the 27 countries on the current list in the VWP.

Edited by Rwlaird
 
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...