Russia Today Anchor Quits On Air

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

It's true as far as I'm concerned.

Prove that isn't.

[Pooky 3,850]

Or even worse, calling all pattriots, communists...

Generalisations like this of any kind serve only to highlight the prejudice of the author.

It's true as far as I'm concerned.

Prove that isn't.

Not my problem to prove. You made the accusation. You provide the proof.

Only you can't, can you?

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

As I say, it says a lot that you're more concerned by my post than the one it was in response to.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

Generalisations like this of any kind serve only to highlight the prejudice of the author.

Not my problem to prove. You made the accusation. You provide the proof.

Only you can't, can you?

You don't set the rules mate. Nothing is owed to you, participation is voluntary and I'm only interested in what I choose to be.

If you don't like that you don't have to. Only I won't tell you to get out of the country because I don't like your opinion.

[Pooky 3,850]

As I say, it says a lot that you're more concerned by my post than the one it was in response to.

In your mind, maybe. That you can't prove your accusation speaks more.

You don't set the rules mate. Nothing is owed to you, participation is voluntary and I'm only interested in what I choose to be.

If you don't like that you don't have to. Only I won't tell you to get out of the country because I don't like your opinion.

Funny you should mention setting the rules. Maybe you should have thought about that before asking me to prove something.

A little hypocritical of you, really.

[JohnR! 5,495]

Generalisations like this of any kind serve only to highlight the prejudice of the author.

Precisely my point. Edited March 9, 2014 by Gegel

[Pooky 3,850]

Precisely my point.

My initial argument was against the generalisation that was made. I made no partisan counter-argument, and my response to you should have made clear why.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

In your mind, maybe. That you can't prove your accusation speaks more.

Funny you should mention setting the rules. Maybe you should have thought about that before asking me to prove something.

A little hypocritical of you, really.

There's no obligation for me to do anything. I'm fine with that. You don't seem to be.

[Pooky 3,850]

There's no obligation for me to do anything. I'm fine with that. You don't seem to be.

I've already done enough, thanks.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

Then there's nothing more to talk about. I'm glad that you get warm and fuzzy feelings posting on an internet message board. I guess that's one way to get your kicks.

[Pooky 3,850]

Then there's nothing more to talk about. I'm glad that you get warm and fuzzy feelings posting on an internet message board. I guess that's one way to get your kicks.

Well, today was my turn to feed the trolls.

[Karmalicious 60]

Well, today was my turn to feed the trolls.

Lololol. Thanks for that.

[Karee 4,191]

Good news!

Blood Test Might Predict Who Will Develop Alzheimer's

Source:

http://www.nbcnews.com/health/aging/blood-test-might-predict-who-will-develop-alzheimers-n47206

I'll probably get tested because surely these folks blaming Bush are a figment of my imagination.

[eieio 1,594]

So somebody quit a tv job?

[Darnell 8,479]

ya, it was weird and stuff.