'Texas Economic Miracle' is a Bunch of Bull

[one...two...tree 2,762]

The Washington Monthly / By Ed Kilgore

...a lot of the “Texas Miracle” talk is based on simple misinformation. For one thing, a big part of Texas’ current stretch of growth is based on the same old boom-and-bust economics of the oil and gas industry that has always blessed and cursed the state, not anything attributable to state policies.

Outside the energy sector, are Americans really “voting with their feet” for the governing policies of Rick Perry by moving to the Lone Star State in vast numbers? Not exactly:

[A]ccording to Census Bureau data, 441,682 native-born Americans moved to Texas from other states between 2010 and 2011. Sounds like a lot. But moving (fleeing?) in the opposite direction were 358,048 other native-born Americans leaving Texas behind. That means that the net domestic migration of native-born Americans to Texas came to just 83,634, which in a nation of 315 million isn’t even background noise….

Net domestic migration to Texas peaked after Hurricane Katrina devastated Louisiana and Mississippi, and has been falling off ever since.

Moreover, those supposedly fleeing to refuge to Texas from godless socialist places like California aren’t actually experiencing relief from higher taxes, unless they are very wealthy:

Texas has sales and property taxes that make its overall burden of taxation on low-wage families much heavier than the national average, while the state also taxes the middle class at rates as high or higher than in California. For instance, non-elderly Californians with family income in the middle 20 percent of the income distribution pay combined state and local taxes amounting to 8.2 percent of their income, according to the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy; by contrast, their counterparts in Texas pay 8.6 percent.

And unlike in California, middle-class families in Texas don’t get the advantage of having rich people share equally in the cost of providing government services. The top 1 percent in Texas have an effective tax rate of just 3.2 percent. That’s roughly two-fifths the rate that’s borne by the middle class, and just a quarter the rate paid by all those low-wage “takers” at the bottom 20 percent of the family income distribution. This Robin-Hood-in-reverse system gives Texas the fifth-most-regressive tax structure in the nation.

Middle- and lower-income Texans in effect make up for the taxes the rich don’t pay in Texas by making do with fewer government services, such as by accepting a K-12 public school system that ranks behind forty-one other states, including Alabama, in spending per student.

Even businesses (if they aren’t large enough to feed from the state’s various corporate welfare troughs) don’t necessarily find Texas hospitable:

The business case for Texas does not speak for itself. It may be a great place to be a big oil or petrochemical company, or a politically favored large corporation able to wring out tax concessions. Its state laws are also hostile to unions, and its wage levels are generally lower than in much of the rest of the country. But for the vast majority of businesses, which are small and not politically connected, Texas doesn’t offer any tax advantages and is in many ways a harder place to do business. This is consistent with Census Bureau data showing that a smaller share of people in Texas own their own business than in all but four other states.

All in all, economic conditions in Texas are hardly miraculous:

The state may offer low housing prices compared to California and an unemployment rate below the national average, but it also has low rates of economic mobility, minimal public services, and, unless you are rich, taxes that are as high or higher than most anywhere else in America. And worse, despite all the oil money sloshing around, Texas is no longer gaining on the richest states in its per capita income, but rather getting comparatively poorer and poorer.

Edited March 4, 2014 by Porterhouse

[Crashed~N2~Me 970]

Written by a Washington "journalist". (& note - Washington is one of the few States able to compete - value to value - with Texas)

This "journalist" does not provide full disclosure.

No Food Tax.

No Medicine Tax.

Low cost of living (housing, food and energy).

& Best of All = NO NANCY PELOSI - yeeeeeeeeeehaaaaaw!!

Average property tax for Texas is a measly 1.8%.

[LibCampFireClub 635]

Written by a Washington "journalist". (& note - Washington is one of the few States able to compete - value to value - with Texas)

This "journalist" does not provide full disclosure.

No Food Tax.

No Medicine Tax.

Low cost of living (housing, food and energy).

& Best of All = NO NANCY PELOSI - yeeeeeeeeeehaaaaaw!!

Average property tax for Texas is a measly 1.8%.

Texas would be a lot better if they would just spread the wealth around so that everyone can have a shot.

[Crashed~N2~Me 970]

Texas would be a lot better if they would just spread the wealth around so that everyone can have a shot.

Please qualify "everyone". Spreading means sharing and that word "sharing" makes me feel nervous.

[LibCampFireClub 635]

Please qualify "everyone". Spreading means sharing and that word "sharing" makes me feel nervous.

I'm being tongue in cheek. It makes me nervous also when the democrat party starts touting income inequality and starts pushing the agenda that success is a bad and greedy thing occupied by only 1% of the population, while the other 99% struggle. Need I mention how much entitlement programs have increased under this regime?

Edited March 4, 2014 by ExExpat

[Crashed~N2~Me 970]

I'm being tongue in cheek. It makes me nervous also when the democrat party starts touting income inequality and starts pushing the agenda that success is a bad and greedy thing occupied by only 1% of the population, while the other 99% struggle. Need I mention how much entitlement programs have increased under this regime?

Phew...okay. I feel better now & what you stated up ^there ^ = very much agreed.

[lostinblue 1,989]

income inequality in Washington DC is at what rate?

Edited March 4, 2014 by lostinblue

[B_J 2,752]

Texas has won top honors from 'Site Selection' magazine as the best state in the country to either locate a new business or expand an existing business, the fifth time in the past decade that Texas has won the top honor, 1200 WOAI news reports.

Under the headline 'What Texas Does Right,' the magazine cited in addition to the usual factors like low taxes and a skilled workforce, new factors which is said are 'increasingly priorities' in the site selection process, including an adequate supply of water, affordable power and transportation infrastructure which allows products and citizens to move around safely and expeditiously.

http://www.woai.com/articles/woai-local-news-sponsored-by-five-star-cleaners-119078/texas-ranked-tops-for-business-location-12119847

[lostinblue 1,989]

"its wage levels are generally lower than in much of the rest of the country." It would not have anything to do with all the undocumented Democrats that reside in Texas would it. The ones you are not willing to evict .

[The Nature Boy 4,224]

Not one word to refute the economy is booming,

ROFL