Putin's war, not Obama's

[The Nature Boy 4,224]

1. It wasn't an outrage. You know why? Because it wasn't even reported until last year.

2. My point is if it's not illegal, what law is broken? Just like when Bush was all into wiretapping our phones, folks were okay with it. Obama keeps doing it, now it's an issue.

Situational ethics. If it's right or wrong, the rules don't change because a different person is sitting in the white house.

Nope wrong is wrong. I don't make bones about that.

Using political power and the agency of the IRS to intimidate political opponents and squash freedom of dissent is an atrocious foul stench in the nostril of liberty, you defending it just because you support our current President is dreadful.

How do we know what laws were broken, the head of the organizational will not testify..

[LibCampFireClub 635]

Yep, damn sure wasn't funny when Bush did it to the liberal groups when he was in office. http://www.cnn.com/2013/07/18/politics/irs-scandal/

It is refreshing to actually see your response, and I mean that. The article you posted is from July, 2013 so it's several months old. We know more now, and will learn even more soon.

The IRS Scandal involved:

• At least 292 conservative groups targeted
• At least 5 pro-Israel groups targeted
• Constitutional groups targeted
• Groups that criticized Obama administration were targeted
• At least two pro-life groups targeted
• A Texas voting-rights group was targeted
• Conservative activists and businesses were targeted.
• At least one conservative Hispanic group was targeted
• IRS continued to target groups even after the scandal was exposed

George, the Treasury inspector general for tax administration, told Democratic Rep. Sandy Levin of Michigan in a letter that just six progressive groups were targeted compared to 292 conservative groups, reports the Washington Examiner.

In Wednesday's letter to Levin, the top Democrat on the House Ways and Means Committee, George also said that 100 percent of conservative groups seeking tax-exempt status were scrutinized, compared to 30 percent of progressive groups.

[lostinblue 1,989]

It is refreshing to actually see your response, and I mean that. The article you posted is from July, 2013 so it's several months old. We know more now, and will learn even more soon.

Don't let facts be getting in a liberals way.

[Penny Lane 8,159]

What's so amazingly funny is, that despite the fact that about 80% of your replies are insults or stupid face palm graphics, because most of your positions are not defend able with logic, amazingly I think you actually believe the above nonsense.

Almost like using single letters to respond to people when you don't have anything else to say.

Pot meets kettle indeed.

[We Keep Receipts 9,238]

Nope wrong is wrong. I don't make bones about that.

Using political power and the agency of the IRS to intimidate political opponents and squash freedom of dissent is an atrocious foul stench in the nostril of liberty, you defending it just because you support our current President is dreadful.

How do we know what laws were broken, the head of the organizational will not testify..

I'm pointing out how the outrage was different when Bush was in power. You talk about dreadful? Look at your conservative brothers and sisters blaming ACA and Obama for every single ill in this world. You got folks posting about shootings and somehow tying it to ACA.

[We Keep Receipts 9,238]

It is refreshing to actually see your response, and I mean that. The article you posted is from July, 2013 so it's several months old. We know more now, and will learn even more soon.

From the article I posted:

In the memo Cummings made public Tuesday, IRS employees who identified themselves as Republicans, Democrats and independents said there was no political motivation or outside influence involved in the agency's handling of tax-exempt requests from groups with possible or likely political affiliations.

According to the memo, an IRS tax law specialist based in Washington who described herself as Republican said "no, not at all" when asked whether there was any evidence that the agency targeted Obama's political enemies.

"That's kind of laughable that people think that," the memo quoted the woman as saying.

Don't let facts be getting in a liberals way.

Never stopped you before. Still waiting on the 1000 employee store or the cook who makes 20 dollars an hour.

[Penny Lane 8,159]

Blaming a shooting on Obamacare is one of the silliest things I've seen here lately. At least this place never fails to surprise you.

[We Keep Receipts 9,238]

Blaming a shooting on Obamacare is one of the silliest things I've seen here lately. At least this place never fails to surprise you.

And they talk about us liberals. Yet this is what they come up with.

[The Nature Boy 4,224]

Almost like using single letters to respond to people when you don't have anything else to say.

Pot meets kettle indeed.

Funny my single letter where because most liberals answer every debate on e of about 3-4 ways

It's either Bush or Reagan did it and I don't recall you saying anything then. Did you know me in 1984? Do two wrongs make a right

or

Just discredit any source that is not a left wing propaganda machine. What's so amazing about this one is, that most of the time that don't dispute the truth or counter it, they just attack the source.

or

Just claim you can't comprehend what their great intellect is trying to say, Call you an name, insult your intelligence and move on,

or

Call you a racist

It very rarely deviated from these 4 , so why keep typing the same old thing every time they do it

OK checking out..About to load my 2 glocks, one Taurus .380. Mossberg Tactical 12 guage and head to the hood to collect rent

I should video all the excuses. One lady said she should not pay because I ain't fixed a big hole in the roof in over a month..Pfft Just be glad she has a place.

[Penny Lane 8,159]

I should video all the excuses. One lady said she should not pay because I ain't fixed a big hole in the roof in over a month..Pfft Just be glad she has a place.

I'd be pretty pissed paying for a place with a big hole in the roof for over a month, too.

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

From the article I posted:

In the memo Cummings made public Tuesday, IRS employees who identified themselves as Republicans, Democrats and independents said there was no political motivation or outside influence involved in the agency's handling of tax-exempt requests from groups with possible or likely political affiliations.

According to the memo, an IRS tax law specialist based in Washington who described herself as Republican said "no, not at all" when asked whether there was any evidence that the agency targeted Obama's political enemies.

"That's kind of laughable that people think that," the memo quoted the woman as saying.

Never stopped you before. Still waiting on the 1000 employee store or the cook who makes 20 dollars an hour.

No political motivation? but, but, but...

As Rick Perry would say: oops.

[LibCampFireClub 635]

From the article I posted:

In the memo Cummings made public Tuesday, IRS employees who identified themselves as Republicans, Democrats and independents said there was no political motivation or outside influence involved in the agency's handling of tax-exempt requests from groups with possible or likely political affiliations.

According to the memo, an IRS tax law specialist based in Washington who described herself as Republican said "no, not at all" when asked whether there was any evidence that the agency targeted Obama's political enemies.

"That's kind of laughable that people think that," the memo quoted the woman as saying.

Never stopped you before. Still waiting on the 1000 employee store or the cook who makes 20 dollars an hour.

Come on now. The democrat party has circled their wagons, but is losing to the onslaught of the evidence. Again, this investigation is NOT over. NOT even close. Lois Learn Something will testify according to her attorney. Remember, she is the one who planted this case as a phony question during a press conference. She knows where this all started exactly who it is that directed her to do it. We now know it wasn't rogue agents. A lot of smoke is rising off obama's head now, and the Congressional Oversight Committee is tracking him. The dots are getting connected. We will find out who the crook is, and hopefully they will be spending several years in jail.

Edited March 4, 2014 by ExExpat

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

Alright, time to break out the tinfoil. Them pigeons need it badly.

[We Keep Receipts 9,238]

Come on now. The democrat party has circled their wagons, but is losing to the onslaught of the evidence. Again, this investigation is NOT over. NOT even close. Lois Learn Something will testify according to her attorney. Remember, she is the one who planted this case as a phony question during a press conference. She knows where this all started exactly who it is that directed her to do it. We now know it wasn't rogue agents. A lot of smoke is rising off obama's head now, and the Congressional Oversight Committee is tracking him. The dots are getting connected. We will find out who the crook is, and hopefully they will be spending several years in jail.

I guess even a tax person saying it's not a conspiracy isn't enough to assuage you, even one who identifies as Republican. We'll see how this turns out.

[deleted-05292014 331]

I stopped counting after:

1. Obama illegally changed his signature law more than 40 times

2. The IRS illegally targeted conservative groups

3. The NSA illegally listens to and saves information about everyone without a warrant

4. Eric Holder issued warrantless searches of press members

5. The president said he has a pen and a phone and doesn't need congressional approval

Looks like someone needs to go back to school and take civics 101.

1. laws can be amended and changed.

2. The same irs whose head was a conservative appointed by Bush? Lol no wrong doing found keep trying

3. Nsa been doing that since the 90s hardly anything Obama ordered.

4. Really? If that was true he would be gone.

5. Executive orders are within the right of the President. If you don't like it elect a Republican next time around who can remove any executive order from the previous administration.