Jump to content
one...two...tree

NRA Urges Senate To Reject Surgeon General Nominee For Saying Gun Violence Is A Public Health Threat

 Share

4 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: Country: Philippines
Timeline

apimages_vivek-murthy-surgeon-general-63

The National Rifle Association (NRA) sent a letter to Senate leaders on Wednesday evening urging the chamber not to confirm Dr. Vivek Murthy, President Barack Obama’s nominee for Surgeon General, over Murthy’s belief that gun violence presents a major public health threat. The letter was issued on the same day that Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) said he would place a hold on Murthy’s nomination over similar concerns.

“Dr. Murthy’s record of political activism in support of radical gun control measures raises significant concerns about his ability to objectively examine issues pertinent to America’s 100 million firearm owners and the likelihood that he would use the office of the Surgeon General to further his preexisting campaign against gun ownership,” wrote NRA Institute for Legislative Action (NRA-ILA) executive director Chris Cox in a letter to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell.

“Given Dr. Murthy’s lengthy history of hostility towards the right to keep and bear arms, along with his calls for the full weight of the federal government’s health apparatus to be used to target lawful gun ownership, there is little reason to believe that he would not work to further a gun control agenda if confirmed as Surgeon General. Simply put, the confirmation of Dr. Murthy is a prescription for disaster for America’s gun owners.”

The NRA specifically criticizes Muthy’s stance that doctors should ask patients about gun ownership and discuss gun safety procedures, his belief that more federal funding should be allocated towards gun violence research, and his support for a host of legislative gun violence prevention measures such as universal background checks and an assault weapons ban.

Murthy’s position isn’t particularly controversial in the medical community. Most major doctors’ groups, including the American Medical Association and the American Academy of Pediatrics, treat gun violence as a public health concern and believe it’s an entirely appropriate issue to discuss with patients. And past Surgeons General, including Reagan-appointee C. Everett Koop, have spoken out on the public health threats presented by guns. Koop co-authored a 1992 essay in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) entitled, “Time to Bite the Bullet Back.”

Murthy has already addressed his gun violence stance. In testimony before the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions (HELP) committee earlier this month, he explained that his primary focus area as Surgeon General will be obesity prevention, which he believes is the “defining public health challenge” of our time.

“I do not intend to use the Surgeon General’s Office as a bully pulpit for gun control,” said Murthy in response to a question by Sen. Lamar Alexander (R-TN) about his position on guns. “That is not going to be my priority… My concerns with regards to issues like gun violence have to do with my experience as a physician, seeing patients in emergency rooms who have come in with acute injuries; but also seeing many patients over the years who are dealing with spinal cord injuries, post traumatic stress disorder, and other chronic complications from gun violence.”

At the time, that answer seemed to please GOP committee members. “I am glad to hear that,” said Alexander. “We have very well-motivated senators here who have different points of view on the Second Amendment issues and on the new healthcare law, and no one doubts the sincerity of each side.”

“I appreciated the comments that you have made on Second Amendment rights,” added Sen. Mike Enzi (R-WY).

http://thinkprogress.org/health/2014/02/27/3337931/vivek-murthy-nra-guns-public-health/

Edited by Porterhouse
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline

Remember Joycelyn Elders and her "safer guns, safer bullets"?

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Country: Philippines
Timeline

The NRA needs and loves gun violence. The more gun violence, the more fearful people become. The NRA loves fearful people because fearful people are more likely to buy guns.

Yep. They pretend to cater to their members and gun safety, but really they've become lobbyists for the gun manufacturers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...