Jump to content
Pooky

Loss at Volkswagen plant upends union's plan for U.S. South

 Share

23 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: Country: England
Timeline

The vote to organise failed 712 to 626, despite tacit approval of Volkswagen and heavy campaigning by the UAW and it's supporters.

Mind you, if you believe Sen. Corker, the management at VW were playing both sides of the fence.

http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/02/15/us-autos-vw-election-idUSBREA1D1DP20140215

Don't interrupt me when I'm talking to myself

2011-11-15.garfield.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Other Country: China
Timeline

One of my clients just shut the doors on a manufacturing facility in Ontario yesterday. They could no longer be competitive because of the union wages. 8 of my employees (who were also represented by the USW) also lost their jobs, some of whom had over 20 years in that plant.

The company sold all the assets to one of their competitors here in the states (Alabama). As hard as I tried to tell my employees that voting in the union would hurt them and not help them they just wouldn't listen. It took about 5 years for the union to shut down that plant.

Edited by Operator
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Other Country: China
Timeline

As far as I can see they work really hard to screw with management and collect dues from the bargaining units. I used to think they gave their folks those cool jackets with the union patch on them but they don't, they have to pay for them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: China
Timeline

If Volkswagen already pay well, with decent benefits, and maintain good working conditions, what purpose would the union have served? unsure.png

Make donations to fill the democratic coffers and support their liberal causes.

If more citizens were armed, criminals would think twice about attacking them, Detroit Police Chief James Craig

Florida currently has more concealed-carry permit holders than any other state, with 1,269,021 issued as of May 14, 2014

The liberal elite ... know that the people simply cannot be trusted; that they are incapable of just and fair self-government; that left to their own devices, their society will be racist, sexist, homophobic, and inequitable -- and the liberal elite know how to fix things. They are going to help us live the good and just life, even if they have to lie to us and force us to do it. And they detest those who stand in their way."
- A Nation Of Cowards, by Jeffrey R. Snyder

Tavis Smiley: 'Black People Will Have Lost Ground in Every Single Economic Indicator' Under Obama

white-privilege.jpg?resize=318%2C318

Democrats>Socialists>Communists - Same goals, different speeds.

#DeplorableLivesMatter

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Country: England
Timeline

They tried that ####### at our plant like 5 years ago and it got voted down. Unions are worthless.

Until the unions get back to the core principle of representing their members interests in the workplace and forego the overt political activism outside of those interests, they will continue to lose relevance in the modern workplace.

Don't interrupt me when I'm talking to myself

2011-11-15.garfield.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Timeline

The vote to organise failed 712 to 626, despite tacit approval of Volkswagen and heavy campaigning by the UAW and it's supporters.

Mind you, if you believe Sen. Corker, the management at VW were playing both sides of the fence.

http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/02/15/us-autos-vw-election-idUSBREA1D1DP20140215

Politically speaking, the Republicans were against this VW union because the UAW is a big donor to the Democrat party. You even had a sitting U.S Senator, Bob Corker lie in order to sway the vote.

http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/02/13/volkswagen-corker-idUSL2N0LI05620140213

It's not just ideology, the major motive why Republicans today are against unions is because unions are the ONLY big money machine in the Democratic party. If you take out the unions then you have free reign of corporate influence who mainly donate to Republican causes in politics. I think it was mainly a strategic move. VW did not ever say they were against unions. .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Country: England
Timeline

Politically speaking, the Republicans were against this VW union because the UAW is a big donor to the Democrat party. You even had a sitting U.S Senator, Bob Corker lie in order to sway the vote.

http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/02/13/volkswagen-corker-idUSL2N0LI05620140213

It's not just ideology, the major motive why Republicans today are against unions is because unions are the ONLY big money machine in the Democratic party. If you take out the unions then you have free reign of corporate influence who mainly donate to Republican causes in politics. I think it was mainly a strategic move. VW did not ever say they were against unions. .

Did Sen. Corker lie? :unsure:

We'll find out next week, when VW announce their future production location. I have a feeling that VW were playing both sides of the field, on this one, so as not to upset the unions, but also to keep the local politicos on board, too. ;)

Don't interrupt me when I'm talking to myself

2011-11-15.garfield.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Timeline

Until the unions get back to the core principle of representing their members interests in the workplace and forego the overt political activism outside of those interests, they will continue to lose relevance in the modern workplace.

Ideological argument, not all unions are involved in making political contributions. It is their right to do that if they want. I think some companies take very good care of their employees and address the grievances between the management and workers, as I have read VW does. There are also some bad companies that exploit workers and create conditions that are dangerous to them and do not care. At the same token there are good unions and then there are poorly managed unions.

Workers in a union have more say over how that union is ran than workers in a corporation have a say in how that business is ran. I'm not saying whether that is good or bad only to prove my point that if a worker does not like what his union is doing or how he is representing him he can vote for change. In the VW case if after a year the workers didn't see any benefit to the union they could have voted to disband it.

I support all of the unions that employ mainly low wage workers such as the United Food & Commercial Workers. http://www.ufcw.org/

Reagan destroyed unions. He gets credit for that. Unions aren't even that significant anymore. Have to research but last I heard only 30-25% of the work force in America is unionized.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Timeline

Did Sen. Corker lie? unsure.png

We'll find out next week, when VW announce their future production location. I have a feeling that VW were playing both sides of the field, on this one, so as not to upset the unions, but also to keep the local politicos on board, too. wink.png

Yes perhaps you are right and they did. To me it's all about democracy. The people voted and that's that. It's their work environment and they should not be influenced by either the Left or the Right. But as in life, all things are political so kind of hard to get it out of the dialog.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Country: England
Timeline

Yes perhaps you are right and they did. To me it's all about democracy. The people voted and that's that. It's their work environment and they should not be influenced by either the Left or the Right. But as in life, all things are political so kind of hard to get it out of the dialog.

The whole campaign for the vote was political, with little to nothing to do with the pay and conditions of the workers at the plant.

As stated previously, VW are a good employer, with decent pay and benefits and a record of playing fair with their employees. With that in mind, and being the supposed core reason for workplace unions, what was the point of this two-year campaign, if not political? :huh:

Don't interrupt me when I'm talking to myself

2011-11-15.garfield.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...