Zimmerman to fight in boxing match for charity

[Gary and Alla 3,694]

which one was it.. To very different things.

Because you think someone is following you dows not give you the right to assault them

OMG. The trial is over.

TM was attempting to murder his neighbor and got capped for it. Marvin doesn't have to like it. Who knows how many others TM murdered and never got caught?

[The Nature Boy 4,224]

OMG. The trial is over.

TM was attempting to murder his neighbor and got capped for it. Marvin doesn't have to like it. Who knows how many others TM murdered and never got caught?

The collective civil rights poverty pimps worked the sheep that blindly follow them into a snit fit. Only this time it did not work and justice prevailed. How dare we hold our breath and everyone not cave in.

Bottom line truth

[We Keep Receipts 9,238]

which one was it.. To very different things.

Because you think someone is following you dows not give you the right to assault them

Both, by GZ's actions. Even when TM said stop following me and used a racial slur, GZ still didn't identify himself, nor did he explain what he was doing and why. The assault was completely avoidable, had GZ used any type of common sense.

[Darnell 8,479]

OK - will Zimmerman wear a cup during the match?

Maybe his opponent will simply keep pounding him in the 'nads.

[Gary and Alla 3,694]

Both, by GZ's actions. Even when TM said stop following me and used a racial slur, GZ still didn't identify himself, nor did he explain what he was doing and why. The assault was completely avoidable, had GZ used any type of common sense.

If you do not like the ending of a movie, do you watch it over and over expecting a different ending?

There was a trial, it has been settled. It cannot be appealed. That is our system. Obviously NONE of what you mention is relevent (even if it is true) Do you beleive you know something the prosecutors did not? Seriously? If you want to change our system and restore the one where people can be lynched,,,then you can work on that with your elected representatives. You seem to have no end of desire for eliminating the rights of black people.

Totally baffling.

[We Keep Receipts 9,238]

If you do not like the ending of a movie, do you watch it over and over expecting a different ending?

There was a trial, it has been settled. It cannot be appealed. That is our system. Obviously NONE of what you mention is relevent (even if it is true) Do you beleive you know something the prosecutors did not? Seriously? If you want to change our system and restore the one where people can be lynched,,,then you can work on that with your elected representatives. You seem to have no end of desire for eliminating the rights of black people.

Totally baffling.

Kind of like claiming CC reduced crime in a city when it hasn't been implemented yet. That's baffling.

Still waiting for that proof.

[Darnell 8,479]

eh - I say use Chicago as the touchstone, after CC is implemented.

[The Nature Boy 4,224]

Both, by GZ's actions. Even when TM said stop following me and used a racial slur, GZ still didn't identify himself, nor did he explain what he was doing and why. The assault was completely avoidable, had GZ used any type of common sense.

The assault was completely avoidable, had GZ TM used any type of common sense. Fixed

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

I don't see how anyone can have such a certain opinion on what happened in that case when the facts are so sketchy.

[Gary and Alla 3,694]

I don't see how anyone can have such a certain opinion on what happened in that case when the facts are so sketchy.

The facts were determined by a trial. TM was attempting to murder GZ and he shot him through the heart as is allowed by law when someone is trying to kill you.

GZ was acquitted. Fact. Nothing sketchy about it.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

You mean the law that allows you to kill someone for almost no reason at all under the pretext that you thought your life was in danger.

In theory someone could shoot you dead on a deserted street for any reason they wanted and claim it was self defence. So yes Gary, sketchy.

[slim 1,533]

When you shoot someone dead on a deserted street do you place them on top of you, bang your head against the ground several times, then call the police?

Do state'a witnesses corroborate your story?

Anyone who still thinks this was sketchy probably voted for Obama because "they like his policies."

[We Keep Receipts 9,238]

When you shoot someone dead on a deserted street do you place them on top of you, bang your head against the ground several times, then call the police?

Do state'a witnesses corroborate your story?

Anyone who still thinks this was sketchy probably voted for Obama because "they like his policies."

What does Obama have to do with this at all? I forgot, you can't help but bring him up because you "hate" his policies.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

When you shoot someone dead on a deserted street do you place them on top of you, bang your head against the ground several times, then call the police?

Do state'a witnesses corroborate your story?

Anyone who still thinks this was sketchy probably voted for Obama because "they like his policies."

Obama has nothing to do with it. But for the record, I have never voted for him.

I have no particular issue with the Zimmerman/Martin case but I do see a problem with laws that allow a person to get away with murder or manslaughter on the pretext of self defence.

You don't because you have an agenda. And I don't give a toss who you voted for.

[slim 1,533]

Ignore the facts and evidence. Worked out well in the past. "But we cant get a fair shake in court because they ignore the evidence."

And how should self defense laws work?