Jump to content

8 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ukraine
Timeline
Posted

http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/us-judge-upholds-connecticut-gun-control-law-22305314

This is how we win. "Winning" a case in a Federal District court accomplishes nothing. Why "win" a case that affects only one state? Hopefully this will go to the SCOTUS or at minimum the Federal Court of Appeals.

This is one of multiple cases working through the system now...one is before the SCOTUS this year. We need to "lose" all of them until we get to the big show. That is how we get Heller and McDonald decisions.

VERMONT! I Reject Your Reality...and Substitute My Own!

Gary And Alla

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: China
Timeline
Posted

Covello found that assault weapons are commonly and legally used in Connecticut and elsewhere. But he said the state ban was justified in the interest in public safety.

SCOTUS says you can't ban guns in common use..????

Now the last "3-4 mass shootings ,school shootings involved a shotgun..... these also will be banned for the public safety ...correct

If more citizens were armed, criminals would think twice about attacking them, Detroit Police Chief James Craig

Florida currently has more concealed-carry permit holders than any other state, with 1,269,021 issued as of May 14, 2014

The liberal elite ... know that the people simply cannot be trusted; that they are incapable of just and fair self-government; that left to their own devices, their society will be racist, sexist, homophobic, and inequitable -- and the liberal elite know how to fix things. They are going to help us live the good and just life, even if they have to lie to us and force us to do it. And they detest those who stand in their way."
- A Nation Of Cowards, by Jeffrey R. Snyder

Tavis Smiley: 'Black People Will Have Lost Ground in Every Single Economic Indicator' Under Obama

white-privilege.jpg?resize=318%2C318

Democrats>Socialists>Communists - Same goals, different speeds.

#DeplorableLivesMatter

Filed: Timeline
Posted

http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/us-judge-upholds-connecticut-gun-control-law-22305314

This is how we win. "Winning" a case in a Federal District court accomplishes nothing. Why "win" a case that affects only one state? Hopefully this will go to the SCOTUS or at minimum the Federal Court of Appeals.

This is one of multiple cases working through the system now...one is before the SCOTUS this year. We need to "lose" all of them until we get to the big show. That is how we get Heller and McDonald decisions.

I agree with you, but I wouldn't quote the term winning. Its too Charlie Sheen

1d35bdb6477b38fedf8f1ad2b4c743ea.jpg

Posted

Covello found that assault weapons are commonly and legally used in Connecticut and elsewhere. But he said the state ban was justified in the interest in public safety.

SCOTUS says you can't ban guns in common use..????

Now the last "3-4 mass shootings ,school shootings involved a shotgun..... these also will be banned for the public safety ...correct

Assault weapon. If I hit you with a baseball bat, a rock, a stick, a skillet... don't those then become assault weapons?

I love how the term is used with little to no definition. A black powder rifle is an assault rifle if I fire it at someone. A semi-auto 5.56mm no more so.

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ukraine
Timeline
Posted

Covello found that assault weapons are commonly and legally used in Connecticut and elsewhere. But he said the state ban was justified in the interest in public safety.

SCOTUS says you can't ban guns in common use..????

Now the last "3-4 mass shootings ,school shootings involved a shotgun..... these also will be banned for the public safety ...correct

Some will try. Why not? In the 60's and 70's it was the "Saturday Night Special" that they wanted to ban. "Not all handguns, just "Saturday Night Specials" . Translation "all handguns" Didn't work Then the big money drug dealing and smuggling started and the bad guys decided to start using GOOD guns and then they wanted to ban those. "Assault Rifles" they call them. They had been around for about 70 years but they just "discovered" them.

Then Joe Biden, VP (Democrat) said "Buy a shotgun" and it seems everyone has!

VERMONT! I Reject Your Reality...and Substitute My Own!

Gary And Alla

Filed: Country: Monaco
Timeline
Posted

Assault weapon. If I hit you with a baseball bat, a rock, a stick, a skillet... don't those then become assault weapons?

I love how the term is used with little to no definition. A black powder rifle is an assault rifle if I fire it at someone. A semi-auto 5.56mm no more so.

Isn't taking a term with little or no definition how we got to this point? We went from 'arms' in the 2nd Amendment to semi-automatic rifles and all sorts of paraphernalia that belongs in a combat zone. Goose. Gander.

200px-FSM_Logo.svg.png


www.ffrf.org




Filed: Timeline
Posted

Assault weapon. If I hit you with a baseball bat, a rock, a stick, a skillet... don't those then become assault weapons?

I love how the term is used with little to no definition. A black powder rifle is an assault rifle if I fire it at someone. A semi-auto 5.56mm no more so.

Assault weapon equals black and scary….everyone knows that!

1d35bdb6477b38fedf8f1ad2b4c743ea.jpg

Filed: Timeline
Posted

Isn't taking a term with little or no definition how we got to this point? We went from 'arms' in the 2nd Amendment to semi-automatic rifles and all sorts of paraphernalia that belongs in a combat zone. Goose. Gander.

Generally speaking I believe the interpretation is that to bear arms, its something you can carry. That being said, artillery for most of US history was legal in private hands (and still is in some states).

1d35bdb6477b38fedf8f1ad2b4c743ea.jpg

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...