Fertility doctor's son who poisoned pregnant girlfriend with abortion pill 'because he was in love with another woman' is jailed for 14 years

[JohnR! 5,495]

The man should have that right also to decide if the baby should be killed the same as the mother....

Consider reading the copy the OP posted.

If it is poison then all abortion pills should be withdrawn from the market ....Why should poison be so selective.on who takes it.

You guys have to make up your minds....

Edited January 29, 2014 by Gegel

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

There is a special brand of stupidity at work in this thread. Either that or someone is attempting very bad satire.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

The man should have that right also to decide if the baby should be killed the same as the mother.... It is a war on men otherwise....

Perhaps the fetus should have the right to abort both parents. That makes about as much sense as what are saying here.

[Karee 4,190]

The man should have that right also to decide if the baby should be killed the same as the mother.... It is a war on men otherwise....

I guess when men start getting pregnant, they'll have the same rights. Until then, women are unique in that regard.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

LIB might be the exception to that rule.

[elmcitymaven 9,712]

If it is poison then all abortion pills should be withdrawn from the market ....Why should poison be so selective.on who takes it.

Do you understand the concept of poison and poisoning? Or is it beyond your ken?

[GandD 5,966]

If it is no crime for the woman to destroy the baby then it should be no crime for the man.

If it is a crime for the man then any woman who kills her baby should get the same number of years I thought you liberals would be "enlightened" ... All the sudden it is a war on men.

Look man, if you consider it a human the second the egg is fertilized, you're never going to understand the other side. Plus, you're a dude, so you're never going to understand that part. You think the biggest problem problem with the us is unwed mothers and then oppose abortion? People want to f**k, and they're going to, in many cases regardless of whether they're married or planned it. Stop trying to make everyone the moral authority because that is an exercise in futility. Laws/programs in a society need to be based on prevention AND dealing with people's f**k ups. All in a way that try's to minimize the impact on society.

I'm pro choice not because I don't care about "fetus rights" or Jesus or whatever. It's simple lost, if they don't want the kid, I don't want to force them, because at some point, their sh*tty half a$$ed attempt to parent a kid they didn't want is going to affect me via crime, prisons, gangs, drugs, or welfare. Something neither of us care to see more of.

[Karee 4,190]

I'm pro choice not because I don't care about "fetus rights" or Jesus or whatever. It's simple lost, if they don't want the kid, I don't want to force them, because at some point, their sh*tty half a$$ed attempt to parent a kid they didn't want is going to affect me via crime, prisons, gangs, drugs, or welfare. Something neither of us care to see more of.

Nail meet head.

[GandD 5,966]

The man should have that right also to decide if the baby should be killed the same as the mother.... It is a war on men otherwise....

A war on men huh?

[Danno 1,228]

In this case the crime is that this guy terminated a pregnancy without the woman's consent.

Are you reading the same story we are?

Read the part where is says-

"his original charge, killing an unborn child."

Not "failure to gain consent of a women"

"He was originally charged with murder but under a plea deal the charges were reduced to tampering with a consumer product and conspiracy to commit mail fraud."

Edited January 29, 2014 by Danno

[Peikko 1,575]

Are you reading the same story we are?

Read the part where is says-

"his original charge, killing an unborn child."

Not "failure to gain consent of a women"

Yes, that's nailed it Danno, the nub of the story honed in on in a trice. Good job as usual

[Novembro 1,763]

If the mother did not want the baby ...planned parenthood would have assisted in the death of the child.

You're trying too hard.

[JohnR! 5,495]

Are you reading the same story we are?

Read the part where is says-

"his original charge, killing an unborn child."

Not "failure to gain consent of a women"

"He was originally charged with murder but under a plea deal the charges were reduced to tampering with a consumer product and conspiracy to commit mail fraud."

In this case the crime is that this guy terminated a pregnancy without the woman's consent. The key word being 'consent', or rather, lack thereof. You might also consider the option of reading the copy the OP used, where you will find more pertinent details that might help you form an educated opinion.

[Danno 1,228]

In this case the crime is that this guy terminated a pregnancy without the woman's consent. The key word being 'consent', or rather, lack thereof. You might also consider the option of reading the copy the OP used, where you will find more pertinent details that might help you form an educated opinion.

I took the time to post relevant comments to my point, why are you always alluding to something somewhere to make sense of your position?

[JohnR! 5,495]

Yes, that's nailed it Danno, the nub of the story honed in on in a trice. Good job as usual

I sometimes suspect the west to possess the sole rights to lateral thinking...