Ex-student calls teacher over alleged sex abuse, posts talk on YouTube

[We Keep Receipts 9,238]

http://www.cnn.com/2014/01/21/justice/california-teacher-alleged-sex-assault/index.html?hpt=hp_t2

(CNN) -- A woman who says a female teacher from middle school sexually abused her for years decided to confront the teacher -- and post video of the exchange on YouTube.

Within hours, the educator resigned from her job at another school in California. Police launched an investigation. And the former student, who once felt powerless, now says she feels vindicated knowing the ex-teacher is no longer working with children.

It's too bad the woman will never serve any jail time.

[decocker 7,198]

agree with the first comment..end statute of limitations on child sex abuse crimes.

Edited January 21, 2014 by val erie

[We Keep Receipts 9,238]

agree with the first comment..end statute of limitations on child sex abuse crimes.

I think there shouldn't be a statue of limitations on any violent crime.

[decocker 7,198]

I think there shouldn't be a statue of limitations on any violent crime.

i agree, although this doesn't sound like 'violent' crime. more manipulative..

[We Keep Receipts 9,238]

i agree, although this doesn't sound like 'violent' crime. more manipulative..

Being she was a kid, I can see that. I was just lamenting that any crime that can be classified as abuse, would be violent in my mind.

[decocker 7,198]

Being she was a kid, I can see that. I was just lamenting that any crime that can be classified as abuse, would be violent in my mind.

considering that sexual abuse of a child results in completely disrupting that child's growth and alters their existence until they die - you're dead on.

[Danno 1,228]

Now if I had posted this story, I would have been accused of highlighting the story because of the Gay angle.

When priests do this with boys they are called pedophiles, why is that not universal?

[decocker 7,198]

Now if I had posted this story, I would have been accused of highlighting the story because of the Gay angle.

When priests do this with boys they are called pedophiles, why is that not universal?

marvin knows the difference between the 'gay angle' and pedophilia. you don't and that's why you get called out..

[We Keep Receipts 9,238]

Now if I had posted this story, I would have been accused of highlighting the story because of the Gay angle.

When priests do this with boys they are called pedophiles, why is that not universal?

Because Danno, I posted the story and link in tact. I didn't photoshop two lesbians kissing and said, this is why this happens. Nor do I blame gay people for abuse.

Thanks Val, even though you're not Penny or Maven, you're still awesome!

[Danno 1,228]

marvin knows the difference between the 'gay angle' and pedophilia. you don't and that's why you get called out..

No, actually, I am consistent, it's folks like you who label Priests who seek young men and spare the labels when it is a teacher.

[decocker 7,198]

No, actually, I am consistent, it's folks like you who label Priests who seek young men and spare the labels when it is a teacher.

actually danno, you have that backwards. you're the one who brought gay up. and you're the only one who brings up gay when priests come up. and scouting.

eta: you're correct you are consistent with the backwards..

Edited January 22, 2014 by val erie

[GandD 5,966]

A priest molesting a boy is the same as a school teacher molesting a student.

[We Keep Receipts 9,238]

No, actually, I am consistent, it's folks like you who label Priests who seek young men and spare the labels when it is a teacher.

I know this might be hard for you to understand. But it's like this:

If a man looks to sleep with boys(from children to teenagers) he's a pedophile: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedophilia

Pedophilia or paedophilia is a psychiatric disorder in which an adult or older adolescent experiences a primary or exclusive sexual attraction to prepubescent children, generally age 11 years or younger, though specific diagnostic criteria for the disorder extends the cut-off point for prepubescence to age 13. As a medical diagnosis, it is a psychiatric disorder in persons 16 years of age or older. An adolescent who is 16 years of age or older must be at least five years older than the prepubescent child before the attraction can be diagnosed as pedophilia.

She was 12 when she was being abused. Meaning her assailant was a pedophile. The same thing goes for priests that go after young boys. If the man is 17 or older, they're classified as adults.

So, what have we learned? If it's under 16, it's pedophilia. If it's over, then it's choice(by the definition of it).

A priest molesting a boy is the same as a school teacher molesting a student.

Yep. They're both pedophiles.

[Danno 1,228]

I know this might be hard for you to understand. But it's like this:

If a man looks to sleep with boys(from children to teenagers) he's a pedophile: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedophilia

Pedophilia or paedophilia is a psychiatric disorder in which an adult or older adolescent experiences a primary or exclusive sexual attraction to prepubescent children, generally age 11 years or younger, though specific diagnostic criteria for the disorder extends the cut-off point for prepubescence to age 13. As a medical diagnosis, it is a psychiatric disorder in persons 16 years of age or older. An adolescent who is 16 years of age or older must be at least five years older than the prepubescent child before the attraction can be diagnosed as pedophilia.

She was 12 when she was being abused. Meaning her assailant was a pedophile. The same thing goes for priests that go after young boys. If the man is 17 or older, they're classified as adults.

So, what have we learned? If it's under 16, it's pedophilia. If it's over, then it's choice(by the definition of it).

Yep. They're both pedophiles.

Marv we seem to be in agreement, though I should point out, that three quarters of the boys molested by priests were into puberty, in many cases Young men.

So this is what is so odd to keep hearing this referred to as "pedophilia priests" by so many. And yet when teachers do the same thing, it never gets that label.

It's also been we noted that 3/4 of the victims were boys and not girls, wonder why that is, when priests have access to so many parishs and school children..... yet the primary desire was for boys and young men.

We are also told that priests getting married would solve this problem, yet I am not so sure.

I know of people in the military or contract workers who rarely see their wives due to deployment, yet we don't hear of that separation causing normal men to suddenly grow and interest in teens?

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

All those words and not one mention of 'consent'.