Judge strikes down North Carolina ultrasound abortion law

[Karee 4,191]

(CNN) -- A North Carolina law that made women who wanted an abortion get an ultrasound and then have the image described to them is unconstitutional, a federal judge ruled Friday.

"The Supreme Court has never held that a state has the power to compel a health care provider to speak, in his or her own voice, the state's ideological message in favor of carrying a pregnancy to term and this court declines to do so today," U.S. District Judge Catherine Eagles said in her ruling.

The law required abortion providers to perform an ultrasound and place the image in the woman's line of sight. The fetus would then be described in detail even if the woman asked the provider not to.

Supporters of the law had argued that it would promote childbirth.

The American Civil Liberties Union and other groups that brought the lawsuit praised the judge's decision.

"Today's court ruling protects the rights of women and their doctors from the ideological agenda of extremist lawmakers," said Jennifer Rudinger, executive director of the ACLU of North Carolina.

Source:

http://edition.cnn.com/2014/01/18/justice/north-carolina-abortion-law/index.html?hpt=hp_t3

[We Keep Receipts 9,238]

That's messed up.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

Good. It was a dumb law that insulted women.

[Karee 4,191]

Good. It was a dumb law that insulted women. Rational people.

Fixed.

[Gary and Alla 3,694]

Good news. Now if we can just get a judge to rule that the state cannot compel you to HAVE a health care provider. The government needs to stay out of women's wombs I say...and the rest of their bodies!

[Operator 1,927]

Aaaahhh the Tar Hole state.

Unfortunately this wasn't the most ridiculous law on the books in this moral Christian state.