Inadmissibility 212(a)(6)(C)(ii)

[Ana & Cesar 5]

Hi guys,

I made a mistake my husband was inadmissible under section 212a(6)©(i) and not (ii). His order of removal was under section 235(b)(1). Sorry I was confused by the (x)mark on his paperworks, That makes a lot of difference now. I did a lot of reading the last 2days and it looks like it will not be as serious as (ii) is, we may be not be required to file a waiver since his bar is done in 2012 (as per I-212 instruction 2nd page). I hope I am not mistaken here, but I can see a light at the end of the tunnel. At the same time, it's not over till it's over...

[jan22 3,070]

Not sure why you quoted me because I didn't have the question, but it is waiverable, only for non immigrant visas. That being said, it's clear that we didn't get the whole story and I still think the OP has to prepare for the worst.

Sorry -- I didn't know it would be considered offensive to include your post as a quote. I'll try to remember your User ID and not quote you again.

The reason I did so on this one was because the information you cited as having found said immigration benefits for 6© ineligibilities would only be available with a waiver. Since that is not accurate for immigration benefits (only for non-immigration purposes), I wanted to clarify. A 212(a)(6)©(i) which is fraud and misrepresentation can be waived for immigrant visas, but not a 6©(ii). As far as the original poster is concerned -- since the application is for an immigrant visa -- a 6©(ii) false claim to U.S. citizenship is not waiverable.

[ShirahBet 42]

Sorry -- I didn't know it would be considered offensive to include your post as a quote. I'll try to remember your User ID and not quote you again.

It wasn't offensive, it just wasn't clear. The response you posted did not appear to be directed towards me. But yes, those issues are waiverable for non-immigrant visas, which is not what the OP is seeking. The OP has also since indicated that she got the inadmissibility category wrong.