Marriage Fraud Question

[foifoi 11]

would it be an entirely outrageous guess: that all foifoi ever received verbally or in writing from any official was that they take these matters very seriously. Why would they ever release any information to her pertaining to his individual case, let alone in writing. And whatever verbal comment she thought she heard, was her own interpretation

which goes back to previously made point: why in the world cry fraud back at USCIS, if USC had lured the foreigner by implied sponsorship promise - and subsequently has backed out? foifoi fully described all competitor assets, but never revealed how she got her Beckham to begin with

the Beckham was found in the US. the FDNS situation is they contacted me themselves after i had reported the Beckham, so the FDNS has shown very active interest in this ad thanked me numerous times for evidences I had presented, so your assumptions are waste of time unfortunately. the FDNS officer with whom I exchange emails i very helpful and although does not disclose whole a lot he did mention that my ex had moved out of the area, but that he's in a constant contact with his local uscis office now and they are really on this. He said that fraud was confirmed. Perhaps it's time not to 'outrageously guess' anymore as I am pretty capable of interpreting things as they are not as I want them to be.

Edited January 8, 2014 by foifoi

[SingleDad2usc 71]

well maybe/maybe not (it's not like you quoted any proof here)...others don't appear to believe you received any information on his case. But on the other angle: what's this stocking of your ex- via no less USCIS, who you originally heavily petitioned to receive bona-fide marriage benefit; then backed out of your own promise to the immigrant (and to USCIS). No fault of yours? What substantiated bona-fide marriage?

Edited January 8, 2014 by SingleDad2usc

[foifoi 11]

i didn't find your comment rude at all, an obese person is an obese person not because of anything it's simply a choice, nobody was born fat.

Also USCIS can't be that stupid, if he's tall and good looking marrying a fat chick will never work out and it's an immediate red flag. but i read lot of things that if wife (usc) fights the case, he will most likely succeed, (but yes USCIS can make that journey a painful one)

Anywho i believe it is your business and you're definitely right do whatever you can.

thanks. I am succeeding now, but you also forgot to mention that she's not only obese, but also is much older than him, so another red flag considering the background and situation )) getting hitched by a fat and older lady (with a sagging neck) while you look sexy, young and tall with hot body right before you are having your conditional card expire while your 1st wife is accusing of fraud does give away things I am sure ))))

[Merrytooth 5,748]

the Beckham was found in the US. the FDNS situation is they contacted me themselves after i had reported the Beckham, so the FDNS has shown very active interest in this ad thanked me numerous times for evidences I had presented, so your assumptions are waste of time unfortunately. the FDNS officer with whom I exchange emails i very helpful and although does not disclose whole a lot he did mention that my ex had moved out of the area, but that he's in a constant contact with his local uscis office now and they are really on this. He said that fraud was confirmed. Perhaps it's time not to 'outrageously guess' anymore as I am pretty capable of interpreting things as they are not as I want them to be.

foifoi,

Ignore his comments.. he is know to troll many marriage fraud threads.

[foifoi 11]

well maybe, it's not like you quoted proofs here...But on other angle: what's this stocking of your ex- via no less USCIS, who you originally heavily petitioned to receive bona-fide marriage benefit; then backed out of your own promise to the immigrant (and to USCIS). No fault of yours?

no not my fault as I can not assume that i was going to get lied to and be used. didn't have that in my plans

[foifoi 11]

well maybe, it's not like you quoted proofs here...But on other angle: what's this stocking of your ex- via no less USCIS, who you originally heavily petitioned to receive bona-fide marriage benefit; then backed out of your own promise to the immigrant (and to USCIS). No fault of yours?

quoted what proofs? my proofs are in my email inbox with all the FDNS emails exchanged, so your point is....? what is it that i can help you with? you keep trying to imply that i either don't talk to fdns or something else...

wouldn't u think that perhaps i think i would know better as to what the fdns has said than you? or is that not a possibility? my ex is under serious watch now, so there. )) i can confidently say that I was a success in this regard ))

[SingleDad2usc 71]

None of us have plans on marriage breakdown; but what bona-fide marriage have you proved?

[foifoi 11]

Well my question is: haven't you done everything you could possibly do already, foifoi? I mean, where could this new 'hard evidence' be coming from now you're divorced and he's married to someone else? I suppose he'd have issues with his GC and stuff considering the investigation that's been taking place, remarrying so quickly and so forth, but this is for the USCIS to handle now, is it not?

I'm not supporting fraud, i just think there's only so far one can go and you've done your bit. Let the authorities do theirs. It's the new wife's headache now. You can't solve it for her.

yes I did everything I could and it was a success! ))

None of us have plans on marriage breakdown; but what bona-fide marriage have you proved?

to whom?

[SingleDad2usc 71]

to USCIS

[cdneh 3,112]

quoted what proofs? my proofs are in my email inbox with all the FDNS emails exchanged, so your point is....? what is it that i can help you with? you keep trying to imply that i either don't talk to fdns or something else...

wouldn't u think that perhaps i think i would know better as to what the fdns has said than you? or is that not a possibility? my ex is under serious watch now, so there. )) i can confidently say that I was a success in this regard ))

The FDNS have stated, many times, that they do not discuss a case with third party interests. That is what you are now. Divorced. Whatever is going on, it is now between him and his new wife and USCIS.

Full stop.

[foifoi 11]

The FDNS have stated, many times, that they do not discuss a case with third party interests. That is what you are now. Divorced. Whatever is going on, it is now between him and his new wife and USCIS.

Full stop.

yes and they don't disclose their functions to me, so what's your point? they simply tell me to continue forwarding me info necessary for further assessment as I keep finding more evidence of his fraud outside of our marriage so your point is what? who said that the fdns is disclosing everything to me just because i am in contact with them via email? even the agent told me numerous times that they have privacy laws but that they are really on this case fully and there's 2 offices involved in this now.

to USCIS

at the adj. interview no...my ex has no evidence for his i-751 hence jumping into a new marriage the last minute of his exp with a fat and old lady while looking like D.B. his fraud was confirmed months before this marriage with the woman so this 2ndmarriage turns out to be worthless to him but he doesn't know it yet. ))

[SingleDad2usc 71]

clear as day: not one contributor to this topic believed OP's relationship with USCIS.

What's not clear: how foifoi decides to keep pushing USCIS into action vs Beckham, when she was his sponsor to begin with, presenting bona-fide marriage to them. What was bona-fide about that marriage? (I apologize for not understanding anything about immigration. My only experience is in taking care of two children from birth for the past 100,000 hours)

Edited January 8, 2014 by SingleDad2usc

[foifoi 11]

clear as day: not one contributor to this topic believed OP's relationship with USCIS.

What's not clear: how foifoi decides to keep pushing USCIS into action vs Beckham, when she was his sponsor to begin with, presenting bona-fide marriage to them. What was bona-fide about that marriage? (I apologize for not understanding anything about immigration. My only experience is in taking care of two children from birth for the past 100,000 hours)

ah! ok so I am lying now? can you specify the reason as to why i need to waste time in writing stuff that does not exist? will imagining that the fdns is in contact with me actually make it the reality? are you claiming that you know better than I do if I am in contact or not? bonafides of the marriage on my part were the feelings, but apparently not on part of the immigrant. not sure what the sponsorship got to do with it if its part of the procedure when marrying to an immigrant so it had to be done, so what? are you going to continue implying that i am not in contact with the fdns by any chance? or do you think just because you have issues in your head and don't believe me for whatever reason then that means that I have not been in contact with them? do you feel like your own personal problem with this changes anything?

[cdneh 3,112]

My point is you need to move on. You have done what you can. His GC, his wife, his life, stopped being your business when you divorced him, and did what you could to get him into any sort of trouble you could dig up. So what if he moved on to someone YOU don't think is up to your standard. Is she a kinder person? Calling her names, denigrating their relationship, whatever it may be, makes you look petty, vindictive, and out for blood. It's stalking. As much as you would like us to believe you are best buddies with the FDNS, we aren't buying it.

[foifoi 11]

clear as day: not one contributor to this topic believed OP's relationship with USCIS.

What's not clear: how foifoi decides to keep pushing USCIS into action vs Beckham, when she was his sponsor to begin with, presenting bona-fide marriage to them. What was bona-fide about that marriage? (I apologize for not understanding anything about immigration. My only experience is in taking care of two children from birth for the past 100,000 hours)

did you ask every single person here if they believe me or not...or do u think people are bored like you sitting home and taking care of kids like you and decided to just to come up with a story to tell as a fantasy of some sort just to waste her and other people's time reading it? now..if u have an issue in believing that fdns actually DOES do its job then maybe you should bang your head against the wall...might change things for u. i also did not post my situation here to see who will believe me or not...so i appreciate if u stop wasting the space under my topic because obviously you are not being helpful in any way and simply stating your useless opinions calling me a liar....please keep your personal opinions to yourself, they really don't change the reality as you can imagine.