The Majority of Military Sexual Assault Victims Are Men. ( How could Danno have been so right?)

[Danno 1,228]

You mean like your fact that gays are assaulting men in the military? Isn't that "fact" what started this thread?

I never made any claim as to how many were gay.

Obviously it would be a sizable number but sometimes initiations can be legally construed to fit that definition.

For instance, there was a "tradition" if you will, of spray painting a guys balls on a certain occasion.

I never saw it done but I did hear about it after the fact type thing.

IIRC, the occasion was if a guy was getting married, he would get "Black balled."

[The Nature Boy 4,224]

I think Marv is full of #######.

He is a nice guy but a moral legend in his own mind.

He is an interesting case study though because no matter what group he belongs to he hold no resemblance to it.

(Just my opinion)

spot on

[TBoneTX 46,216]

Administrative action has been taken in regard to a participant herein. This thread is one personal attack away from being locked. To avoid this, please strive (as some have been doing) to adhere to the topic itself, rather than commenting on individual participants or personalities.

Edited January 4, 2014 by TBoneTX

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

Administrative action has been taken in regard to a participant herein. This thread is one personal attack away from being locked. To avoid this, please strive (as some have been doing) to adhere to the topic itself, rather than commenting on individual participants or personalities.

When the premise of the topic is deliberately inflammatory, the topic of discussion is naturally going to focus on that side of it. It's not difficult to comprehend, maybe more time needs to be spent on vetting that rather than on individual comments.

If VJ didn't permit bigoted content, you wouldn't get half of the drama. Something to bear in mind perhaps?

[Penny Lane 8,159]

When the premise of the topic is deliberately inflammatory, the topic of discussion is naturally going to focus on that side of it. It's not difficult to comprehend, maybe more time needs to be spent on vetting that rather than on individual comments.

If VJ didn't permit bigoted content, you wouldn't get half of the drama. Something to bear in mind perhaps?

Exactly.

[We Keep Receipts 9,238]

I never made any claim as to how many were gay.

Obviously it would be a sizable number but sometimes initiations can be legally construed to fit that definition.

For instance, there was a "tradition" if you will, of spray painting a guys balls on a certain occasion.

I never saw it done but I did hear about it after the fact type thing.

IIRC, the occasion was if a guy was getting married, he would get "Black balled."

But that was your intention, no? The article itself said the perps all listed as straight men, not gay. I'll even ask the question, so let's see where your conviction lies. You said in red Liberals are the cause of this, what did they cause? How is this their fault? Not to mention the disrespectful photoshop of something that has ZERO relevance to the story.

spot on

I have no idea what he is talking about.

[spookyturtle 9,466]

For instance, there was a "tradition" if you will, of spray painting a guys balls on a certain occasion.

I never saw it done but I did hear about it after the fact type thing.

IIRC, the occasion was if a guy was getting married, he would get "Black balled."

Still can't get the paint off? That explains everything.

[The Nature Boy 4,224]

When the premise of the topic is deliberately inflammatory, the topic of discussion is naturally going to focus on that side of it. It's not difficult to comprehend, maybe more time needs to be spent on vetting that rather than on individual comments.

If VJ didn't permit bigoted content, you wouldn't get half of the drama. Something to bear in mind perhaps?

Every post is meant to incite spirited debate . What do you want the weather.?

What it is not meant to incite, is mean hateful personal attacks,just because a person cannot defend their point of view.

[The Nature Boy 4,224]

You mean like your fact that gays are assaulting men in the military? Isn't that "fact" what started this thread?

Marvin saying Gays don't commit sexual assault is just as ridiculous as saying it is always gays. I would suspect gays commit at about the same percentage as heterosexuals adjusted for their population.

I would also say the same sex attacks the Gays are the majority as in opposite sex attacks the heterosexuals are the majority.

All it means is that gays are no better or worse than Hetro's as people.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

Every post is meant to incite spirited debate . What do you want the weather.?

What it is not meant to incite, is mean hateful personal attacks,just because a person cannot defend their point of view.

The OP's contention is bigoted. There is no way around that.

[We Keep Receipts 9,238]

Marvin saying Gays don't commit sexual assault is just as ridiculous as saying it is always gays. I would suspect gays commit at about the same percentage as heterosexuals adjusted for their population.

I would also say the same sex attacks the Gays are the majority as in opposite sex attacks the heterosexuals are the majority.

All it means is that gays are no better or worse than Hetro's as people.

I'm not saying they don't. What Danno is saying is gays are responsible for it, even though the article clearly those men identify as hetero. If Danno wants to challenge the writer, have at it.

[Pooky 3,840]

The OP's contention is bigoted. There is no way around that.

That does not preclude participants in the debate from being civil to one another.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

That does not preclude participants in the debate from being civil to one another.

It kind of does.

[Pooky 3,840]

It kind of does.

Then such uncivility deserves the kind of moderator action people are complaining about.

However divisive the topic of discussion, the way people should discuss it need never be other than civil. Degenerating to insults and the like should have place in the exchNge of views.

[Danno 1,228]

It kind of does.

I think what is becoming more and more clear is that you DON"T want the discussion to take place, so you instead run interference.

Everyone has heard your opinion.... over and over again.

Everyone has seen you misrepresent my opening post.

Everyone has heard the moderator try to guide the discussion back on topic and AWAY from personality clashes, yet you insist...... IT:S YOUR WAY OR WE DON"T MOVE FORWARD.

Bro you just can't handle the facts as we know them.... and that is, there is a lot of homosexual sexual assaults taking place.

How many are by homosexuals, we don't know, and trust me...... no one wants to find out. (Up there)

Try for just five minutes to take your personality out of the subject line.

And for G_d sakes quit repeating yourself.