Jump to content

2,998 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: China
Timeline
Posted

Question: Home thermostat (ca. 3 years old), when turned on or off, sometimes flashes random numbers before settling where it should. Replace thermostat?

Take it apart.

1. reseat all electrical connections and

2. replace the battery .

Sometimes my language usage seems confusing - please feel free to 'read it twice', just in case !
Ya know, you can find the answer to your question with the advanced search tool, when using a PC? Ditch the handphone, come back later on a PC, and try again.

-=-=-=-=-=R E A D ! ! !=-=-=-=-=-

Whoa Nelly ! Want NVC Info? see http://www.visajourney.com/wiki/index.php/NVC_Process

Congratulations on your approval ! We All Applaud your accomplishment with Most Wonderful Kissies !

 

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Denmark
Timeline
Posted

Grrr, man.

Grrr on both his front and the OP's a little. I think these type of threads should be country specific like "the petitioner should be there in Jamaica" or something. Comparing a Jamaican CR1 interview with one in Germany or Canada is like apples and oranges. I was the only American in the embassy at Stockholm that day despite there being multiple CR1/K1 interviews. I'd say my husband might have been quizzed more so than what I heard of the other interviews and read on the reviews here.

3/2/18  E-filed N-400 under 5 year rule

3/26/18 Biometrics

7/2019-12/2019 (Yes, 16- 21 months) Estimated time to interview MSP office.

 

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted (edited)

Share!

One Americana spent the entire evening cheerily telling me stories of how she denigrated and abused her employees, justifying it all with "It makes them respect me as a strong boss." What she related was genuinely horrifying, even if only a fraction of it were true. After extricating and trying to compose myself at home, I held my usual private ceremony of tearing up her phone number and watching it flutter into the trash. The next eve, she phoned me to say that she wanted to see me again. Although stunned, I managed to say, "You've got to be kidding," and hung up, c u man.

Another Americana agreed to meet me at the beach. We were talking, and I told her that one firm, inviolable tenet of mine was that if anyone raised her hand against me in anger or committed one act of physical violence, the relationship was immediately and permanently over. She slugged me very hard on the arm with her fist, saying "Like this?" I said, "Why did you do that?" She said, in complete seriousness, "Sometimes, men have to be kept in line, and this is how to do it." Fortunately, we had taken separate cars, or I would have found a way to abandon her there, c u man.

I met yet another Americana on a dating site. She offered to have me come over to her house to cook me "a wonderful lunch -- it'll be so-o-o goooood." I agreed and showed up at 11 a.m. as she suggested. For over 3 hours, she made a big deal of going into the kitchen, spending a lot of time there, and coming out and saying, "It'll be so-o-o goooood." I was left to chat chiefly with her teenage son. Two sets of neighbors came by for different reasons, and this chick invited them for lunch. They declined in great haste, which I noticed. By 2 p.m., I was ready to eat the tablecloth. At 2:45, the chick came out of the kitchen with a plate, which held a sprig of parsley and a speck of meat about an inch in diameter. She delightedly gave it to me and said, "It'll be so-o-o goooood!" I wolfed it and excused myself as fast as I could. The nearest restaurant made its entire weekly budget from one customer shortly thereafter, sigh man.

I went out with still another Americana a few times and told her that I didn't think that anything could develop. A couple of months later, she phoned, said that she definitely wanted to see me again and to give her another chance, so I did. The first re-meeting wasn't great but wasn't bad, and she reiterated her interest in me, so I suggested a Saturday day-trip to a fairly interesting small town. While there, she refused to walk holding my hand, she showed zero signs of physical affection or even much conversational interest, and she made a point of saying that she had to be back in town by a certain time because of another obligation. On the drive home, she said that she was completely in love with her 16-year-old son and planned to keep him with her always. "He's my baby," she said. I asked, "Even when he's an adult and married himself, or if you're remarried?" "Yes!" she said. She had parked by my house, and when we got back, she said, "I want to come in." I said, "Well, look -- you said that you had to be across town very shortly now, and if we go in, it would take at least half an hour to interact with the cat, and you'd have to go anyway." She got in her car in normal fashion and drove off. I was left shaking my head. She never contacted me again. This was 1 April 2006 (no foolin'), the very day that I permanently swore off Americanas and resolved to look overseas, sea man.

The above are only a minute percentage of similar stories. The details of these meetings are less important than the psychological impact. Of course, grizzled veterans of dating need to have their antennae up for weirdness, liars, etc., and to be outstanding "screeners" before offering or agreeing to meet. However, some behavior from seemingly normal people is so bizarre that it stretches the limits of belief or defies it altogether. Could there truly be so many refugees from the insane asylum? I'll always remember how very rattled I was after each of these experiences, and many others besides. A lingering question is how anyone could have been married to these complete psychos in the first place.

Satisfied, Nola, huh man?

Take it apart.

1. reseat all electrical connections and

2. replace the battery .

Thank you, D man.

Edited by TBoneTX

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted

I concur! Blanket statements of incorrect assurances are always lovely, aren't they?

"Si, ma'am" to both of you. Kay-Bonette, your +1 meant a lot to me, si ma'am. You love these "genius-come-latelies" as much as I, si man.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Denmark
Timeline
Posted

Tbone - Actually, I enjoy reading them because I've never dated in that traditional sense (crazy, I know).

3/2/18  E-filed N-400 under 5 year rule

3/26/18 Biometrics

7/2019-12/2019 (Yes, 16- 21 months) Estimated time to interview MSP office.

 

Posted

I dated a crazy guy who tried to leave my car going over an overpass of a major highway. He also threw his dead best friends cowboy hat band out a same said car window when I wouldnt say something mean I had thought of and "said ya know what, nevermind" instead. I dated a few more crazy mofos... I think I prefer being the crazy one, which thankfully only happens once a month.

You have brains in your head. You have feet in your shoes. You can steer yourself any direction you choose.  - Dr. Seuss

 

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted

Tbone - Actually, I enjoy reading them because I've never dated in that traditional sense (crazy, I know).

Are you the happiest sadist then, huh ma'am? wacko.png

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted

I prefer being the crazy one, which thankfully only happens once a month.

Just wait till The First Trimester, wow ma'am. alien.gif

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Denmark
Timeline
Posted

Are you the happiest sadist then, huh ma'am? wacko.png

Actually I'm a switch!

Nah, I'm not delighting in your pain or anything, but I like to learn about people's experiences.

I got an amazing first hand experience in how not to go about being a relationship from my parents' many marriages, so I count myself lucky with that.

3/2/18  E-filed N-400 under 5 year rule

3/26/18 Biometrics

7/2019-12/2019 (Yes, 16- 21 months) Estimated time to interview MSP office.

 

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Mexico
Timeline
Posted

"Si, ma'am" to both of you. Kay-Bonette, your +1 meant a lot to me, si ma'am. You love these "genius-come-latelies" as much as I, si man.

The are, um, fun?

Haha, your dating stories are interesting. I cannot really think of any crazy dating stories, but I have several controlling, abusive, crazy ex-husband tidbits. They are just not the same.

Oh, I sort of have one. I was dating this guy, I guess he was the rebound guy, since he was the first one since I split from my ex. We got in an argument about something and he punched the wall next to my head. He was promptly told to get out. He came back the next day with flowers to apologize and let me know how it was a good thing he punched the wall because he wanted to hit me, but did not. He went on to explain more about how hitting the wall instead of me was a good thing and made him a non-abusive, 'good guy'. After the crazy abusive ####### I went through with my ex, I sure felt like I could really pick the glorious winners of the world. dead.gif

Link to K-1 instructions for Ciudad Juarez, Mexico > https://travel.state.gov/content/dam/visas/K1/CDJ_Ciudad-Juarez-2-22-2021.pdf

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted

I count myself lucky with that.

Triple si, ma'am.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted

I sure felt like I could really pick the glorious winners of the world. dead.gif

My "fraud alert" antennae were always sharper than those of the most ####### consulate. In fact, I pre-date-grilled myself out of several potential rendezvouses (is that the plural, oui man?) before they even eventuated. I was so particular that I'd sometimes go months between dates. This is why the "double-crossers" rattled me so.

Oh -- here's another, sigh man: On a Monday, I set up a restaurant date for a Friday with someone who genuinely seemed like a good prospect. We very carefully confirmed the location, time, and place in the lobby where we'd meet. I ended the call with "I'll be there, and I greatly look forward to seeing you." I showed up as promised, waited and waited and waited, and no sign of her. I was eventually seated and kept looking around and going to the entrance to search. I finally called her. She said, "Well, you didn't call to say that you'd be there, so I figured that you were going to stand me up." Well, thank you, gee ma'am. I was dressed, I was starving, and I was there, so I decided to eat by myself. The restaurant was packed, and everybody else was coupled. I was feeling bad enough already, and the waitress asked, "Just one, sir?" I said, "What do you mean, 'just' one? I was stood up tonight! Does that mean that I have to leave?" The waitress was most apologetic, and in fact she and one of her colleagues gave me a lot of attention. That helped but still didn't remove the sting and the disappointment, which actually lasted for days afterwards.

To her and to all others like her: Honey, don't waste my time, and don't trifle with my hopes and emotions. I'm a real, live human being whose greatest distastes are to be disrespected and disregarded.

Rant: Being greeted at any restaurant with "Just one, sir?" What the dickens -- isn't my money just as good as if I were twins? I could spend less and stick entirely with fast food and not have to be abused like that.

It took too long for me to get this through my skull, but eventually I kept to the practice of not waiting longer than half an hour for anyone, even if it were the president of General Motors.

Deciding to forswear Americanas and search internationally was right to do, si man. After about 6 months, I connected with the small agency that introduced me to Mrs. T-B.-to-be 2 months later. At the end of my first phone call with her, she said, in her rusty English, "T-B., whatever happens between us, please promise me one thing: Please don't ever lie to me." How refreshingly different this was from the confused, psycho Americanas against whose wall I'd been beating my head, gee man.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted (edited)

The usual minus de-dishwarshering, si man: Minister to cat, prep for bed, and go there, zzz man.

Edited by TBoneTX

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Posted (edited)

"Si, ma'am" to both of you. Kay-Bonette, your +1 meant a lot to me, si ma'am. You love these "genius-come-latelies" as much as I, si man.

The are, um, fun?

Haha, your dating stories are interesting. I cannot really think of any crazy dating stories, but I have several controlling, abusive, crazy ex-husband tidbits. They are just not the same.

Oh, I sort of have one. I was dating this guy, I guess he was the rebound guy, since he was the first one since I split from my ex. We got in an argument about something and he punched the wall next to my head. He was promptly told to get out. He came back the next day with flowers to apologize and let me know how it was a good thing he punched the wall because he wanted to hit me, but did not. He went on to explain more about how hitting the wall instead of me was a good thing and made him a non-abusive, 'good guy'. After the crazy abusive ####### I went through with my ex, I sure felt like I could really pick the glorious winners of the world. dead.gif

Agreed with both of you. He reminds me of that fellow who keeps using caps, bright colours and weird fonts and thinks he's a know-it-all/genius about the visa process and the US Government's inner workings when actually he's been spreading massive amounts of misinformation which I've had to counter at times, especially when we had the switch from paper forms > DS-260 > DS-160.

If only you could shut someone down for spreading misinformation constantly. If it were information or instructions on fraud, sure. But "just" misinformation? Don't think that's allowed, unfortunately.

Edit: What also bugs me are those that put their topic titles/posts in all caps as if to try and catch people's eyes. If it were me, I'd lock the thread clearly stating that kind of behaviour is frowned upon on the internet at large and instruct them to post more like a "normal" person. But then I'm zero tolerance and I'm also biased as I said it bugs me. :P

Edited by Wheatley

"What's yours is mine!"

 
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...