Iran says Obama is a liar

[Penny Lane 8,159]

No rational discussion begins with "he lies 100% of the time" or "hero worship"..

Edited November 27, 2013 by Penny Lane

[luckytxn 2,265]

That is your grumpiness coming out. I thought we were but I am in a good mood.

No rational discussion begins with "he lies 100% of the time" or "hero worship"..

[Penny Lane 8,159]

That is your grumpiness coming out. I thought we were but I am in a good mood.

No grumpiness here at all. I think we have two very different definitions of the word rational.

[OnMyWayID 1,489]

Obama told them "If you like your uranium, you can keep your uranium. Period."

Yes but it will not be bomb grade.. It is a stepping stone for six months... I doubt the sincerity of Iran and think this will end up on one of three ways: 1) They make the bomb 2) The get bombed 3) Radical government change that has them abandoning it altogether for major concessions from the west... Have no idea which.

The "interpretations" are the spin for local consumption and fodder for political opponents in the other country. Nobody is claiming this is a solution, just a pull back from the trigger for both sides so that talk can continue.

Edited November 27, 2013 by OnMyWayID

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

I thought we were having a rational discussion.That is overly dramatic to say that we are not. Tell you what after you get that extra coffee and wake up and become less grumpy we can continue.

I'm not sure how making a statement like the one you did could fall under the umbrella of 'rational discussion'.

[luckytxn 2,265]

I tend to be a glass half full type of person. You seem to be that glass half empty. Nothing wrong with that.

I'm not sure how making a statement like the one you did could fall under the umbrella of 'rational discussion'.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

I tend to be a glass half full type of person. You seem to be that glass half empty. Nothing wrong with that.

If you're so glass half-full I'd be wondering why there are 226 posts by you in the archive where you use the word 'sheep' to describe people you disagree with.

[luckytxn 2,265]

I actually don't disagree with them usually. That is a wrong assumption. Instead of making leaps try and stay more grounded.

If you're so glass half-full I'd be wondering why there are 226 posts by you in the archive where you use the word 'sheep' to describe people you disagree with.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

I actually don't disagree with them usually. That is a wrong assumption. Instead of making leaps try and stay more grounded.

Dude I just read what you wrote and said it didn't seem very rational. Then I pointed out that there are over 200 instances of you using the word 'sheep' in a disparaging context.

I'm not sure exactly what I should be grounded in. Presumably nothing that involves actually reading the words that you write. Who knew.

[GandD 5,966]

I thought we were having a rational discussion.That is overly dramatic to say that we are not. Tell you what after you get that extra coffee and wake up and become less grumpy we can continue.

First, I do need another cup of coffee. Second, I am grumpy before coffee. Third, my point is valid. Rationality tends to go away when 100% or always or never or worst or best comes in to play. You can't possibly think Obama is more corrupt than Ulysses S Grant or more devious than Nixon.

No rational discussion begins with "he lies 100% of the time" or "hero worship"..

You know what, you keep beating me to the point. I'm just gonna sit back and +1 you.

[luckytxn 2,265]

I am positive that Obama admin is way more corrupt then Grant's was and easily more devious than Nixon's. So far Obama has set the bar high. The tough part is that a politician will come along and top him eventually due to sheep.

First, I do need another cup of coffee. Second, I am grumpy before coffee. Third, my point is valid. Rationality tends to go away when 100% or always or never or worst or best comes in to play. You can't possibly think Obama is more corrupt than Ulysses S Grant or more devious than Nixon.

You know what, you keep beating me to the point. I'm just gonna sit back and +1 you.

[GandD 5,966]

I am positive that Obama admin is way more corrupt then Grant's was and easily more devious than Nixon's. So far Obama has set the bar high. The tough part is that a politician will come along and top him eventually due to sheep.

Why do you think that? Specifically?

[luckytxn 2,265]

Politicians will always come along to try and out do previous admins. Sheep keep voting the same two parties without fail. Be no change because the same two parties will always be the anointed ones. Why change if one has no need to.

Why do you think that? Specifically?

Edited November 27, 2013 by luckytxn

[Penny Lane 8,159]

I actually don't disagree with them usually. That is a wrong assumption. Instead of making leaps try and stay more grounded.

Good advice coming from the person who believes that if you don't dislike Obama, you worship him as a hero.

I've also been told, by someone else, that he is my God and I'm nothing but one of his followers.

So it seems that making leaps is the norm. I don't hate him with the passion that others here do, so I must love him beyond reason. In their minds, of course.

Edited November 27, 2013 by Penny Lane

[BatmanUSA 105]

Ok, that is kinda funny. But wouldn't that mean they won't get to keep it?

Maybe the funny part is that Obama told the truth to his Muslim brothers...