Jump to content

19 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: Timeline
Posted (edited)

Two US B-52 bombers are reported to have flown over an area of the East China Sea inside China's expanded "air defence zone" without notifying China.

...

"Last night we conducted a training exercise that was long-planned. It involved two aircraft flying from Guam and returning to Guam," said Colonel Steven Warren, a spokesman for the department.

No flight plan was submitted beforehand to the Chinese and the mission went ahead "without incident".

...

An anonymous official told the AFP news agency that the planes were B-52 bombers - the largest aircraft in the US military's arsenal.

...

Under the rules declared by China, aircraft are expected to provide a flight plan, clearly mark their nationality and maintain two-way radio communication to allow them to respond to identification inquiries from Chinese authorities.

http://www.aljazeera.com/news/asia-pacific/2013/11/us-planes-defy-china-air-defence-zone-201311261864900191.html

Edited by mota bhai
Posted

Two US B-52 bombers are reported to have flown over an area of the East China Sea inside China's expanded "air defence zone" without notifying China.

...

"Last night we conducted a training exercise that was long-planned. It involved two aircraft flying from Guam and returning to Guam," said Colonel Steven Warren, a spokesman for the department.

No flight plan was submitted beforehand to the Chinese and the mission went ahead "without incident".

...

An anonymous official told the AFP news agency that the planes were B-52 bombers - the largest aircraft in the US military's arsenal.

...

Under the rules declared by China, aircraft are expected to provide a flight plan, clearly mark their nationality and maintain two-way radio communication to allow them to respond to identification inquiries from Chinese authorities.

http://www.aljazeera.com/news/asia-pacific/2013/11/us-planes-defy-china-air-defence-zone-201311261864900191.html

B-52 isnot the largestplane in the Military

I know it does not matter, the press always gets details wrong

Posted

B-52 isnot the largestplane in the Military

I know it does not matter, the press always gets details wrong

If you include the word 'arsenal' per the OP, the statement stands. Cargo aircraft are not really considered arsenal to my knowledge.

Think Obama asked Putin if the flight was okay?

B and J K-1 story

  • April 2004 met online
  • July 16, 2006 Met in person on her birthday in United Arab Emirates
  • August 4, 2006 sent certified mail I-129F packet Neb SC
  • August 9, 2006 NOA1
  • August 21, 2006 received NOA1 in mail
  • October 4, 5, 7, 13 & 17 2006 Touches! 50 day address change... Yes Judith is beautiful, quit staring at her passport photo and approve us!!! Shaming works! LOL
  • October 13, 2006 NOA2! November 2, 2006 NOA2? Huh? NVC already processed and sent us on to Abu Dhabi Consulate!
  • February 12, 2007 Abu Dhabi Interview SUCCESS!!! February 14 Visa in hand!
  • March 6, 2007 she is here!
  • MARCH 14, 2007 WE ARE MARRIED!!!
  • May 5, 2007 Sent AOS/EAD packet
  • May 11, 2007 NOA1 AOS/EAD
  • June 7, 2007 Biometrics appointment
  • June 8, 2007 first post biometrics touch, June 11, next touch...
  • August 1, 2007 AOS Interview! APPROVED!! EAD APPROVED TOO...
  • August 6, 2007 EAD card and Welcome Letter received!
  • August 13, 2007 GREEN CARD received!!! 375 days since mailing the I-129F!

    Remove Conditions:

  • May 1, 2009 first day to file
  • May 9, 2009 mailed I-751 to USCIS CS
Filed: Country: England
Timeline
Posted

I don't think China is afraid of the B-52. Its not exactly hard to see, catch, or shoot down.

I don't think the B-52s are the whole story.

If I'm not mistaken, the USAF has a detachment of F-22 Raptors stationed at Kadena, on Okinawa. You won't hear about it, but I doubt the heavies were alone. Chinese radar isn't good enough to spot them, but just the suspicion of them being around is likely to give the PLAAF the creeps. The PLAAF's top line air-to-air assets are basically Su-27 Flankers, which are no match for a Raptor up close, and little more than bird food in a BVR engagement.

As power projection goes, this was a quick response to China's arrogance, and a pretty humiliating nose-thumbing at Beijing. :thumbs:

Don't interrupt me when I'm talking to myself

2011-11-15.garfield.png

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Colombia
Timeline
Posted (edited)

I don't think China is afraid of the B-52. Its not exactly hard to see, catch, or shoot down.

I'm trying to think of a plane that could do more damage than a B-52 left alone with its possible ordinance.

Edited by OnMyWayID

I don't believe it.. Prove it to me and I still won't believe it. -Ford Prefect

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Canada
Timeline
Posted

I'm trying to think of a plane that could do more damage than a B-52 left alone to its possible ordinance.

Yes, I'm aware of its ordinance capability. Hardly the plane you want to use in a preemptive bombing run on the PRoC. Obviously, its not the first to go in. Plus they'd easily shoot it down easily.

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Canada
Timeline
Posted

I don't think the B-52s are the whole story.

If I'm not mistaken, the USAF has a detachment of F-22 Raptors stationed at Kadena, on Okinawa. You won't hear about it, but I doubt the heavies were alone. Chinese radar isn't good enough to spot them, but just the suspicion of them being around is likely to give the PLAAF the creeps. The PLAAF's top line air-to-air assets are basically Su-27 Flankers, which are no match for a Raptor up close, and little more than bird food in a BVR engagement.

As power projection goes, this was a quick response to China's arrogance, and a pretty humiliating nose-thumbing at Beijing. good.gif

Maybe. Its certainly a possibility but there's also good odds that it was miscommunication or something more innocent. But I suppose flying an undetectable aircraft over the enemy doesn't exactly show them anything so you may be on to something.

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Colombia
Timeline
Posted

Yes, I'm aware of its ordinance capability. Hardly the plane you want to use in a preemptive bombing run on the PRoC. Obviously, its not the first to go in. Plus they'd easily shoot it down easily.

But they didn't shoot it down... and there it was in the disputed space. What plane could they have seen that would make them upset when two B-52s were nothing to be concerned about?

Well one just came to mind... A spy plane with high resolution cameras.

I don't believe it.. Prove it to me and I still won't believe it. -Ford Prefect

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Canada
Timeline
Posted

So that's twice as easy?

Rats. I guess I've lost all credibility.

Well...............

funny-gifs-dancing-alone1.gif

But they didn't shoot it down... and there it was in the disputed space. What plane could they have seen that would make them upset when two B-52s were nothing to be concerned about?

Well one just came to mind... A spy plane with high resolution cameras.

You think we would shoot down a Chinese bomber that crossed into our airspace in the same scenario?

Filed: Country: England
Timeline
Posted

Maybe. Its certainly a possibility but there's also good odds that it was miscommunication or something more innocent. But I suppose flying an undetectable aircraft over the enemy doesn't exactly show them anything so you may be on to something.

The B-52s were there to be obvious. No way the Chinese could miss them. :no:

The F-22s would not be there to be noticed. The first the PLAAF would have known about Raptors in the vicinity would be when the assets they sent up to intercept the B-52s found themselves in an active radar lock. From that point on, it becomes a real-life game of chicken.

Don't interrupt me when I'm talking to myself

2011-11-15.garfield.png

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Colombia
Timeline
Posted

You think we would shoot down a Chinese bomber that crossed into our airspace in the same scenario?

I'm guessing we would do the same thing we do when Russian bombers test our airspace.. Send a couple of fighter planes to escort their clearly lost plane back to international airspace. We certainly would *not* do what they did: nothing..

I don't believe it.. Prove it to me and I still won't believe it. -Ford Prefect

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...