Obama: I'm Sorry Americans are LOSING Insurance

[Ban Hammer 13,334]

They would marry a Russian woman and say she's white although she technically is but technically isn't.

[DavenRoxy 1,073]

LOL. NO comment...

[The Nature Boy 4,224]

Obama rump swabs do not want to discuss Obamacare. So they divert to something else. Racism is good. The "electables", (democrat congress people that voted for this trash and have to be re-elected) won't be helped by calling the opposition racists.

The best they can hope for is private welfare. A job where they are expected to produce so little that no one notices they are posting on VJ all day.

Racism is usually the quick retreat, when a Leftist outruns their cover.

Just the mere accusation that someone is Racist is enough to ruin them now.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

VJ, where hard done by self-described conservatives argue their points with conviction, knowledge and the benefit of a reasonable education. If only it were that simple, eh?

While the ideological divide is certainky real,on this site its more of an intellectual one. Good for a laugh. A good debate? Not so much!

[elmcitymaven 9,712]

If I like Asians but am bigoted against Mexicans, I am racist.

Mexican is not a race. It is a nationality. You can be prejudiced against or bigoted towards Mexicans generally but not racist against Mexicans as a whole.

This has been a message from The Brown Menace.

[Teddy B 17,252]

Made me do some looking too. Found out:

All racists are bigots. Not all bigots are racist.

Also: That is, a racist is a bigot against a particular race or every race except for his/hers.

Furthermore: A racist is someone who believes in the superiority of one race over another, or who acts differently (usually negatively) towards a person or a group of people because of their race.

So a racist person is bigoted against at least one other race, or perhaps all other races not his/her own.

But I'm not racist. Heck, I never even watch Nascar unless I have no control over the TV.

All of which makes it entirely possible for a racist to marry a person of another race. I'm not sure why this was so difficult for others to grasp.Thank you DavenRoxy.

Edited November 11, 2013 by Teddy B

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

you really are punchy aren't you?

a racist would not marry outside of their own race, because they feel superior to all others.

a bigot would marry outside their own race, just not a particular one.

do you understand now? or do I need to use pictures to help you?

I feel iq points are lost just reading this, let alone writing it.

People are rarely one thing or the other, no matter what you read in the dictionary. Maybe expand the scope of your reading to include a bit of history and psychology.

[Crashed~N2~Me 970]

Maybe a visual will help?

Bigot guilty of racial stereotyping =

Racist guilty of genocide =

[Teddy B 17,252]

Maybe a visual will help?

Bigot guilty of racial stereotyping =

Racist guilty of genocide =

Nope. The claim that smoke has made that anyone who marries a person of another race cannot be a racist, the same claim you hailed as genius, is complete hogwash. As DavenRoxy explained, all racists are bigots, but not all bigots are racists. It is perfectly plausible for a white man to be racist against Blacks and be married to a Latino, Asian or a person of any other race.

[Crashed~N2~Me 970]

Nope. The claim that smoke has made that anyone who marries a person of another race cannot be a racist, the same claim you hailed as genius, is complete hogwash. As DavenRoxy explained, all racists are bigots, but not all bigots are racists. It is perfectly plausible for a white man to be racist against Blacks and be married to a Latino, Asian or a person of any other race.

1) I didn't "hail as genius". YOU hailed ME as genius..(.btw.. thanks for the compliment TB.. means so much coming from you. )...I said I like the fine tuning of the 2. It provides further clarification.

2) & I am still not convinced a (let me cap it for your attention) TRUE racist would marry outside his/her race. That's the topic and still in OPEN discussion. (bcoz) You are yet to prove a TRUE racist has ever married outside his / her own race. while I have produced evidence which bona fide racist organizations forbid it. You can't just say "Dave explained" & that's final! Which leads to #3....

3) I didn't realize Dave was the final authority. When did that happen?

_{(No offense Dave. I saw the same explanation, you provided, on Answers.com too....you know I'm stubborn to a fault & I'm not yet convinced)}

Edited November 11, 2013 by Crashed~N2~Me

[SMOKE 1,426]

Nope. The claim that smoke has made that anyone who marries a person of another race cannot be a racist, the same claim you hailed as genius, is complete hogwash. As DavenRoxy explained, all racists are bigots, but not all bigots are racists. It is perfectly plausible for a white man to be racist against Blacks and be married to a Latino, Asian or a person of any other race.

Thinking isn't a strong point for you, is it?

'The claim that smoke has made that anyone who marries a person of another race cannot be a racist, the same claim you hailed as genius, is complete hogwash.'

'As DavenRoxy explained, all racists are bigots, but not all bigots are racists.'

N/S that's the 'claim' smoke made, and you're agreeing with.

'It is perfectly plausible for a white man to be racist against Blacks and be married to a Latino, Asian or a person of any other race.'

since you're bigger on definitions than thought. look up bigot. it is what you just described.

[Teddy B 17,252]

1) I didn't "hail as genius". YOU hailed ME as genius..(.btw.. thanks for the compliment TB.. means so much coming from you. )...I said I like the fine tuning of the 2. It provides further clarification.

2) & I am still not convinced a (let me cap it for your attention) TRUE racist would marry outside his/her race. That's the topic and still in OPEN discussion. (bcoz) You are yet to prove a TRUE racist has ever married outside his / her own race. while I have produced evidence which bona fide racist organizations forbid it. You can't just say "Dave explained" & that's final! Which leads to #3....

3) I didn't realize Dave was the final authority. When did that happen?

_{(No offense Dave. I saw the same explanation, you provided, on Answers.com too....you know I'm stubborn to a fault & I'm not yet convinced)}

Thinking isn't a strong point for you, is it?

'The claim that smoke has made that anyone who marries a person of another race cannot be a racist, the same claim you hailed as genius, is complete hogwash.'

'As DavenRoxy explained, all racists are bigots, but not all bigots are racists.'

N/S that's the 'claim' smoke made, and you're agreeing with.

'It is perfectly plausible for a white man to be racist against Blacks and be married to a Latino, Asian or a person of any other race.'

since you're bigger on definitions than thought. look up bigot. it is what you just described.

You two should do a stand up routine.

True racist.

'It is perfectly plausible for a white man to be racist against Blacks and be married to a Latino, Asian or a person of any other race.'

since you're bigger on definitions than thought. look up bigot. it is what you just described.

What part of "All racists are bigots", "but not all bigots are racists" do you not understand? A person who is bigoted towards one race is also a racist.

[Crashed~N2~Me 970]

You two should do a stand up routine.

True racist.

What part of "All racists are bigots", "but not all bigots are racists" do you not understand? A person who is bigoted towards one race is also a racist.

I'm using the word "true" to help you along the learning curve. You're welcome. Sheeeeesh.

[SMOKE 1,426]

What part of "All racists are bigots", "but not all bigots are racists" do you not understand? A person who is bigoted towards one race is also a racist.

Idk if it will, i hope this helps you understand.

Mexican is not a race. It is a nationality. You can be prejudiced against or bigoted towards Mexicans generally but not racist against Mexicans as a whole.

This has been a message from The Brown Menace.

teddy don't lose site of the fact, we're discussing the profile of a racist and a bigot. NOT the definition in websters or any other dictionary....the profile of

[Teddy B 17,252]

I'm using the word "true" to help you along the learning curve. You're welcome. Sheeeeesh.

Perhaps by adding the word "true" you are referring to a supremacist? A supremacist believes their race is superior to all races.

But to be a racist one only need to be racist towards one or more race of people, not all races.