Jump to content

113 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: Country: Monaco
Timeline
Posted

And the reason you didn't say that is because you are well aware that people by choice, everywhere gravitate towards living in areas where most people are similar to them.

Funny you should attempt to make such a flimsy argument in a forum frequented by those who cross time zones, oceans and other divides in order to establish their lives thousands of miles away from their home country, where presumably most people are similar to them.

200px-FSM_Logo.svg.png


www.ffrf.org




Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Russia
Timeline
Posted

Ergo, inbreeding should generate strength and yet it isn't so. It is almost as though genetic diversity breeds stronger individuals.

I can see however how science here would be at odds with your white supremacist credo.

Dude, havin't seen you in a while, I was wondering when you might get loose.

Didn't you say you worked in the medical field?

Because your post made emotion but not sense.

Think about what you are saying, YOU KNOW MORE ABOUT GENETICS THAN EVERY BREEDER OF CHAMPAIGN RACE HORSE OR CATTLE.

Not one of them breeds at random diversity to get the "Stronger individual."rofl.gif

What you are referring to has minor merit but you have so misunderstood it, that I doubt you would understand how it works.

---------------------------------

secret7vf.gif Do you really think you can build super humans via out-breeding?

type2homophobia_zpsf8eddc83.jpg




"Those people who will not be governed by God


will be ruled by tyrants."



William Penn

Filed: Country: Monaco
Timeline
Posted

Dude, havin't seen you in a while, I was wondering when you might get loose.

Didn't you say you worked in the medical field?

Because your post made emotion but not sense.

Think about what you are saying, YOU KNOW MORE ABOUT GENETICS THAN EVERY BREEDER OF CHAMPAIGN RACE HORSE OR CATTLE.

Not one of them breeds at random diversity to get the "Stronger individual."rofl.gif

What you are referring to has minor merit but you have so misunderstood it, that I doubt you would understand how it works.

---------------------------------

secret7vf.gif Do you really think you can build super humans via out-breeding?

It wasn't a question so much as an observation, your garrulous non-sequitur notwithstanding.

200px-FSM_Logo.svg.png


www.ffrf.org




Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Russia
Timeline
Posted

Funny you should attempt to make such a flimsy argument in a forum frequented by those who cross time zones, oceans and other divides in order to establish their lives thousands of miles away from their home country, where presumably most people are similar to them.

Actually, I think I put up a challenge.... one that you of course failed to address.

You remind me of a girl I once dated. She would do stuff like- make you late to the movie and then complain she missed part of it.

You not only had to read her mind, about what she wanted to eat or where she wanted to go, you had to ignore what she previously said she wanted.

But she was very good lookin so I admit it lasted a few weeks longer than it otherwise would have.

Good to see you back.

type2homophobia_zpsf8eddc83.jpg




"Those people who will not be governed by God


will be ruled by tyrants."



William Penn

Posted

Yo man I'm not the one coming on here spouting fantasy you are.

Just listen to what you posted_

<<<People are quite able to live in mixed communities if they don't hold prejudicial views like these.>>>

Notice you didn't say "People DO live in Mixed communities and no one even notices"

And the reason you didn't say that is because you are well aware that people by choice, everywhere gravitate towards living in areas where most people are similar to them.

In fact, if you will name for me the city where this doesn't happen, I will prove you wrong..... it's a huge country my friend ....just name one city.

But ya can't can you? And if the truth be told .. the best you could do is find the exception to this rule.

IN your mind, the fact that people don't gravitate to each other is a sign of "hate" which to me is sad and simplistic.

Often times people DO gravitate towards each other yet still prefer borders,,,, consider Canada and the US.

You have too much Hostility in your heart, I on the other hand just wish to grant people freedom, whether they want to live next to me or partition off their own area. It's the secret to national tranquility.

freedom-sign.png

You views and opinions on this subject continue to be odious Danno, because you think that how you see the world is how the world is. It simply isn't. Most people live comfortably with their fellow Americans without judging who they are based on whether they look the same as them. You see a black face and see another specious. Odious Danno, odious.

Refusing to use the spellchick!

I have put you on ignore. No really, I have, but you are still ruining my enjoyment of this site. .

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted

Thread locked for review.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted

Lets let this candle burn out

This candle has burned out because of a combination of stereotyping and personal insults. Don't restart this thread or carry its issues into any other.

TBoneTX

on behalf of VJ Moderation

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

 
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...