Jump to content
I AM NOT THAT GUY

NJ [Governor]: 1 judge can't force gay marriage recognition

 Share

10 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: Timeline
TRENTON, N.J. (AP) — New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie's administration says a single judge shouldn't be able to force the state to recognize gay marriage.

That's one of the arguments in legal papers filed Friday by the state in support of its effort to delay implementation of a judge's order last month that gay marriage be legal in the state as of Oct. 21.

The brief for an appeals court comes a day after Judge Mary Jacobson turned down New Jersey's request to delay the effective date of her order while the state Supreme Court decides whether she was right.

__________

Christie supports civil unions, which the state has had since 2007, but says marriage laws should be changed only by a popular vote.

"I don't think that should be decided by 121 politicians in Trenton or seven judges on the Supreme Court," he said at a debate this week. "It should be decided by the 8.8 million people of New Jersey."

http://xfinity.comcast.net/articles/news-national/20131011/US--Gay.Marriage-NJ/

Yep. Christie is running - reaching out to the Christian Fundamentalists.

Edited by The Patriot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep. Christie is running - reaching out to the Christian Fundamentalists.

'I am for Gay marriage

I am against judicial activism

He is right

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Timeline

I am for activist judges imposing civil unions where same sex partners get the same legal rights as opposite sex partners when the political class is unwilling to do so.

I am not for activist judges taking the step beyond that, into 'marriage', because at that point the question of legal rights has already been settled. CU gives them that. They have it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Timeline

I am for activist judges imposing civil unions where same sex partners get the same legal rights as opposite sex partners when the political class is unwilling to do so.

I am not for activist judges taking the step beyond that, into 'marriage', because at that point the question of legal rights has already been settled. CU gives them that. They have it.

I cannot think of a single reason—and have not heard one since I undertook this venture—for continued discrimination against decent, hardworking members of our society on that basis.

Various federal and state laws have accorded certain rights and privileges to gay and lesbian couples, but these protections vary dramatically at the state level, and nearly universally deny true equality to gays and lesbians who wish to marry. The very idea of marriage is basic to recognition as equals in our society; any status short of that is inferior, unjust, and unconstitutional.

The United States Supreme Court has repeatedly held that marriage is one of the most fundamental rights that we have as Americans under our Constitution. It is an expression of our desire to create a social partnership, to live and share life's joys and burdens with the person we love, and to form a lasting bond and a social identity. The Supreme Court has said that marriage is a part of the Constitution's protections of liberty, privacy, freedom of association, and spiritual identification. In short, the right to marry helps us to define ourselves and our place in a community. Without it, there can be no true equality under the law.

http://mag.newsweek.com/2010/01/08/the-conservative-case-for-gay-marriage.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Canada
Timeline

I am for activist judges imposing civil unions where same sex partners get the same legal rights as opposite sex partners when the political class is unwilling to do so.

I am not for activist judges taking the step beyond that, into 'marriage', because at that point the question of legal rights has already been settled. CU gives them that. They have it.

The federal government has said they won't recognize CU. they'll only recognize marriages.

Adjusting from F-1
AOS

08/23/2013 - Package Mailed

08/25/2013 - Package delivered
08/29/2013 - Email/text notifications received
09/03/2013 - NOA hard copies received

09/09/2013 - Biometric appointment letter received
09/23/2013 - Biometrics appointment (completed)

10/01/2013 - status online changed to "Testing and Interview"

10/28/2013 - EAD in production
11/06/2013 - EAD received
11/08/2013 - Interview/Approved with RFE for long form birth certificate

12/03/2013 - sent in birth certificate

12/14/2013 - got notification green card in production
12/24/2013 - Green card

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Timeline

The federal government has said they won't recognize CU. they'll only recognize marriages.

There you go. If you want an immigration benefit through marriage, a civil union is not good enough.

Edited by The Patriot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Russia
Timeline

I always get tickled at those people who cling to or repel our systems and principles of governance......... depending on the cause of the moment.

type2homophobia_zpsf8eddc83.jpg




"Those people who will not be governed by God


will be ruled by tyrants."



William Penn

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: China
Timeline

Query - why are the gays migrating to New Jersey? The State income tax is abysmal and gay couples receive no tax benefit.

Sometimes my language usage seems confusing - please feel free to 'read it twice', just in case !
Ya know, you can find the answer to your question with the advanced search tool, when using a PC? Ditch the handphone, come back later on a PC, and try again.

-=-=-=-=-=R E A D ! ! !=-=-=-=-=-

Whoa Nelly ! Want NVC Info? see http://www.visajourney.com/wiki/index.php/NVC_Process

Congratulations on your approval ! We All Applaud your accomplishment with Most Wonderful Kissies !

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...