NOW THIS IS VERY CONFUSING

[MO-MO1974 7]

that works when one is inside the usa. outside the usa? is a different path.

if I had filed the waiver while in the USA I would have still needed to leave and go for an interview and doign it fromthe USA is what has led to me having to go back to my country and wait for my interview.I had tried adjusting while in the States but was refused and for me to go ahead and be able to get all necessary legitimate papers,I have to go this route

[MO-MO1974 7]

Well as long as CO find no other in-admissibles

at interview U should be ok until it gets to the

adjudicators, just be aware there have been waiver

denials on overstay....good luck dude

Thank you for the word of luck.

I would assume those that had waiver denials on overstay also have criminal records or not enough documentation to help their cause for reading through DS-260 and when it comes to thats section,visa overstay seems the slightest of the offences on there

[MO-MO1974 7]

What??

what was the question for?

[QueenE 174]

I'm confused maybe someone could clarify.. so you were denied because of marriage fraud before and you're saying now they cannot deny you based on marriage fraud? (Not saying you are... but even if you are in fact committing marriage fraud?) Is this the same thing as when they say the person is not in a bona fide relationship?

Did your ex by chance file a complaint against you?

[NigeriaorBust 4,087]

There was someone here about 5 years ago, used a USC to get to the US and almost immediately left to marry someone else, this story sounds so familiar,

Anyways if he arrived via I129 F he could never adjust in the states to another wife , If the first wife reported fraud the chances of getting any visa to the US ever are slim no matter how many waivers are filed

[MO-MO1974 7]

I'm confused maybe someone could clarify.. so you were denied because of marriage fraud before and you're saying now they cannot deny you based on marriage fraud? (Not saying you are... but even if you are in fact committing marriage fraud?) Is this the same thing as when they say the person is not in a bona fide relationship?

Did your ex by chance file a complaint against you?

when I was denied,I was accused of marital fraud and after they had done all their investigation,USCIS mailed me and said they were re-opening the case for they believed my marriage was bonafide but I could not adjust my status through another USC.I know it sounds wierd but thats what happened.about a month later,they approved my I-130

And they cant this time for i have been married almost 7 years and have a lot of ties with my wife..heck we have famous ppl married for less.....and no one is accusing them

Edited October 10, 2013 by MO-MO1974

[MO-MO1974 7]

There was someone here about 5 years ago, used a USC to get to the US and almost immediately left to marry someone else, this story sounds so familiar,

Anyways if he arrived via I129 F he could never adjust in the states to another wife , If the first wife reported fraud the chances of getting any visa to the US ever are slim no matter how many waivers are filed

Please note,I came in on a K-3 visa,was married before I came to the United states,had been married to my ex about a year and half and we got divorced about a month after I got here....she initiated the whole process and went the no fault route.if you accuse someone of marital fraud and take them to court,you dont go the no fault route for it basically contradicts what you are saying to the govt. when they approved my I-130,it came wih a letter of re-affirmation which basically means that what I was accused of at 1st,they have found it to be untrue so that accusation gets dropped hence at the embassy,you can not be accused of a previous offence which has been investigated to be a wrong accusation....I hope I am making some sense

[QueenE 174]

Please note,I came in on a K-3 visa,was married before I came to the United states,had been married to my ex about a year and half and we got divorced about a month after I got here....she initiated the whole process and went the no fault route.if you accuse someone of marital fraud and take them to court,you dont go the no fault route for it basically contradicts what you are saying to the govt. when they approved my I-130,it came wih a letter of re-affirmation which basically means that what I was accused of at 1st,they have found it to be untrue so that accusation gets dropped hence at the embassy,you can not be accused of a previous offence which has been investigated to be a wrong accusation....I hope I am making some sense

but you were accused originally based on your first marriage correct? so why couldn't they accuse you again with this current marriage? What made them think you were a committing marriage fraud in the first place? sorry I know my questions have nothing to do with your original post but I was just trying to understand that part of the process better.

[MO-MO1974 7]

but you were accused originally based on your first marriage correct? so why couldn't they accuse you again with this current marriage? What made them think you were a committing marriage fraud in the first place? sorry I know my questions have nothing to do with your original post but I was just trying to understand that part of the process better.

when your case gets re-affirmed,which means whatever reason the had for denying you has been confirmed to be unsubstantiated.I was accused of marital fraud i.e i got married again so that I could get Adjusted but in their findings after a year,they re-opened the case to re-investigate and found out that their reason for denial was wrong thus I was re-approved and asked to start the process from scratch...I was not accused of marital fraud regarding my 1st marriage.Hope I am clear

RE-AFFIRMATION OF PETITION: when your case gets re-opened and previous decision to deny petition gets authenticated