Prof on shutdown: Racist Republicans hate black president

[The Nature Boy 4,224]

Let's see, GZ called the cops on a teen walking home. FACT

TM wasn't committing a crime. FACT

GZ followed him for 4 minutes straight, first in the car, then on foot. FACT

He said these ******* always get away, even though TM had done nothing wrong. FACT

At no time did he ever identify himself, nor did he tell TM what he wanted. FACT

Yet, TM was the aggressor because he called the grown man following him at night a creepy *** cracker.

Yep, nothing strange about his behavior...

TM did commit a crime ..It's called aggravated assault. Had he not been killed in whatwas judged to be self defense he would have been arrested.

You can't beat people in the face because they are walking on the same sidewalk you are.

Your facts just aint facts

bull$hit. NBC said that. GZ didn't say that.

shhh don't disturb the misinformation.

Surely there must be one Democrat/liberal racist here at VJ. It would defy all probability and statistics otherwise.

I thought most liberal democrats were racist

Come on, Marv. You know better.

I remember back in the day when facts were things you could not prove to be untrue

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

First one ###***les.

Second one ###***les.

Third one [it sounds like Zimmerman says under his breath, ‘F-ing coons’ at 2:22] Sounds like????

Fourth one same as #3.

Thank you.

Trouble focusing in this thread, too?

What is the issue at hand? Oh, right, this here:

He said these ******* always get away, even though TM had done nothing wrong. FACT

bull$hit. NBC said that. GZ didn't say that.

Now, let's examine the links on that very point, shall we?

1) Zimmerman: Okay. These a$$holes they always get away.

2) Zimmerman: Okay. These a$$holes they always get away.

3) Zimmerman:

OK.

These a$$holes. They always get away.

4) Zimmerman:

OK.

These #######. They always get away.

So, you're wrong. Zimmermann did say that. Every record out there ahs him say that.

[The Nature Boy 4,224]

And all of the VJ racists are Republicans too.

Marvin is not a Republican

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

Marvin is not a Republican

Marv is not a racist either.

[The Nature Boy 4,224]

Marv is not a racist either.

[Novembro 1,763]

[Darnell 8,478]

Meanwhile back at post #1 -

Duh - that's one 'reporter's' interpretation,

and I say it's wrong, that interpretation.

[BatmanUSA 105]

what.????

There was a major uprising and large demand for "assault" rifles and ammo when Clinton signed the ban....

Ammo prices skyrocketed and sales of hunting rifles soared....!!

all because people were afraid of losing their rights.... and Obama also engineered an increased in sales of riffles and ammo....

[We Keep Receipts 9,238]

what.????

There was a major uprising and large demand for "assault" rifles and ammo when Clinton signed the ban....

Ammo prices skyrocketed and sales of hunting rifles soared....!!

all because people were afraid of losing their rights.... and Obama also engineered an increased in sales of riffles and ammo....

I ask again, where was the tea party?

[BatmanUSA 105]

I don't know/??? maybe they were in Boston.??

I'm not a tea party member..

[We Keep Receipts 9,238]

I don't know/??? maybe they were in Boston.??

I'm not a tea party member..

I guess I am trying to point out that all these things folks have their hands in the air for, have been here for a while, yet there was no uprising.

[BatmanUSA 105]

I guess with American form of government, and presidential election every 4 years, and no one can serve more than 8 years.. this has insulated America from "uprisings"...

[The Nature Boy 4,224]

I ask again, where was the tea party?

I don't know..Where was Miley Cyrus?

[Danno 1,228]

I ask again, where was the tea party?

You seem to be confused at what the tea Party is.

While many of it's members have SOME things in common, they are collectively united on the size of Gov't and the increasing mismanagement of taxes and budgets. What was the debt and deficit in 1994?

CLintons assault weapon ban was the first wide scale ban of guns. (Since the 1930's) it caught most people off guard, even the NRA was in a different mindset at that time, as it were that act was the turning point for the NRA, as many in the organization had strayed way off the path.

Marvin going back the Clinton years is just stupid to try and make your argument that Obamas "Blackness" is the reason for the Tea Party.

You have a little ground to hold when you reasonably ask "Why not during the second half of the Bush years?"

Of course there is an answer for that but not one that would change your mind.... nothing could do that.

When you look at Obama, you see a Black man,.......... and so this must be true for everyone else.

[Danno 1,228]

So why in that post about the black guys killing the white soldier, do you believe they said the word cracker? Is there video to back this up? What about a recording? Sounds like a witness said it and you agree with it. Several folks said it here and you don't believe it, why is that? You seem to have no issue if it's black on white racism. You ask for no proof, you take it at face value and run with it. But if it's black on white, no matter if 100 folks heard it and have it on film, you'd talk about free speech and their rights to be racist.

Marvin, why is this so hard for you to get?

When the only source available is eye witness testimony, that "Is" evidence (though not proof).

When there is multiple recording devices and none of those agree with the eye witness accounts

one must ask.... which is more reliable?

So answer that question Marvin, which is greater proof?

Now to be honest, I too assumed those early reports were true, in a crowd as big as was present that day it was very conceivable, someone could have walked in among them and shouted such things, (since then a number of "plants" have been exposed).

But when when you look at the tape and hear the "Other testimony" from people there, it is clear, there were no mobs shouting the N-word nor spitting on Rep. Conyers. It just never happened.

Now clearly they were baiting the crowd by even taking the longer route, going right through the "gauntlet" of people, no doubt hoping for just such a scene.... why?

The Left always propels a cause off the emotion of a victim.

Q: Have you ever been to a Tea Party event?