Why We Need Separate but Equal

[Danno 1,228]

Why We Need Separate but Equal

http://www.theroot.com/views/why-we-need-separate-equal

(The Root) -- I don't hate many things. I'm pretty good at keeping that emotion in check. But here's a short list of things I hate:

1. Bigots
2. Misogynists
3. Terrorists, including American terrorists, here and abroad, and especially the ones who stand on street corners harassing women who pass by
4. The willfully ignorant

I reserve a special place in my mental hell for anyone who ever utters out loud, "Why do black people need [insert whatever separate-but-equal thing, including award shows, TV channels, magazines, history month]? Isn't that reverse racism?"

This usually comes up after I've had some epic-level social media meltdown about the lack of black people at one of the above-mentioned mainstream places. I wrap it all up by saying, "And this is why we need [the NAACP Awards, BET, Essence, February]." One of those willfully ignorant people inevitably sees that last tweet and comes crying about reverse racism and colorblindness and postracism and Obama.

It makes me want to scream, like that one time Janet and Michael Jackson collaborated for the video"Scream" and they, well, just screamed the whole time about how they were so annoyed with people. Yes, that sums it up perfectly.

The far reaches of institutional racism never fail to amaze me. And I guess this is easy to ignore unless you're intentionally trying to find places that don't affirm you, your desirability, your culture, etc. I think about this -- essentially white privilege -- all the time because in some way I'm reminded daily of not having said privilege.

I thought about it again most recently while watching the Monday-morning reaction to Kerry Washington's loss at the Primetime Emmy Awards Sunday night, which I didn't bother to watch because no one I want to win ever does. My favorite show of all time -- The Wire -- ran for five seasons and is widely considered one of the best shows ever made. It never won an Emmy.

Anyway, over at Clutch magazine, they wondered if Washington was robbed of an Emmy for Outstanding Lead Actress in a Drama Series. Columbus Short, who is Washington's co-star, just flat-out tweeted that she had been robbed. Natalie Maines of the Dixie Chicks even posted a picture of the Emmy audience with the message, "Well hello white people!" because the crowd was just so overwhelmingly white. That let me know it was really bad, because that's the only time white people notice something that people of color have always noticed.

There was plenty of fuss on Twitter, of course, where people expressed that they had really been rooting for Washington. I thought, "How sweet," in that same way I think of kids who still believe in Santa and the Easter Bunny.

A black person winning at a mainstream awards show? I mean, it happens, and sometimes it's televised. But that's still an event, and everyone talks about it for years because that's how long it'll take to happen again.

Washington is the first black woman to lead a series on network TV in 40 years and the first to be nominated for best lead dramatic actress since Cicely Tyson in 1995. This is why we need the BET and NAACP Awards and black-owned networks.

I've thought about this essential whiteout before when I was searching for wedding gowns. I actually (and finally) caught wedding fever after putting it off for a long while, and I created a Pinterest page and bought reams of wedding books. By the end of the first day of pouring through images and magazines, I realized that I was hard-pressed to find a black bride on a mainstream site or in a mainstream magazine. I could flip through an entire magazine and find nothing, or I could go to one of the bridal salons mentioned in the directory and scroll through 100 dresses from the last few years of collections, and there wouldn't be a single black bride.

I know that statistics for single black women are a little high, but the majority still get married. Don't they buy wedding dresses, too?Sheesh. I finally put a picture of a black Barbie in a long dress that may or may not even be a wedding gown, just to have some color on my page on principle. This is why we need Munaluchi Bride.

This infuriates me to Naomi Campbell-level anger back in her phone-throwing days because there are few mainstream places where black people are present, whether we're talking about fashion designers who just refuse to use black models, despite the buying power of black people; business sites that just forget to include black women on their lists of who is smart on Twitter (that means you, Fast Company); black people being virtually ignored by companies except in February -- or December, when they trot out Kwanzaa ads (and I don't even know anyone who practices it); or studios green-lighting so few black movies that when you say on Friday night, "I'm going to see the new black movie," everyone knows what you're talking about because there is only one.

It's continuous and institutional and annoying and wrong. And it's all a summary of reasons that black people need their own [insert "separate-but-equal thing" here]. We're ignored or overlooked or disregarded (or, worse, our contributions are horrifically appropriated, but that's another essay) in the mainstream. Black studios, magazines, designers, network award shows and anything else black aren't examples of reverse racism -- more like a reaction to plain old racism.

Demetria L. Lucas is a contributing editor at The Root, a life coach and the author of A Belle in Brooklyn: The Go-to Girl for Advice on Living Your Best Single Life. Follow her on Twitter.

[Pooky 3,841]

There is no such thing as reverse racism.

It's just racism, pure and simple.

[Danno 1,228]

There is no such thing as reverse racism.

It's just racism, pure and simple.

Are you calling the lady a racist?

[Pooky 3,841]

Are you calling the lady a racist?

No, but I am calling out her innate discrimination inferred by her use of the term "reverse racism"

[Novembro 1,763]

Terribly written. Oof.

[Danno 1,228]

Terribly written. Oof.

On that note I would have to agree, though I am in no position to be critical.

[Darnell 8,479]

A note to Demetria L. Lucas :

Russell Simmons noticed this problem last year, and moved out to LA to fix it. You really should be paying attention to his body of work, these last 2 quarters, this quarter, and all the way into next year.

Seriously.

[We Keep Receipts 9,238]

No, but I am calling out her innate discrimination inferred by her use of the term "reverse racism"

She was using the term in the context that white people always look to organizations that stem from racism and use those as an example of reverse racism. The effect can't be the cause.

Are you calling the lady a racist?

She isn't one.

[We Keep Receipts 9,238]

The problem here is, folks want to get rid of Affirmative Action and minority exclusive organizations, but don't want to fix the inherent racism that precedes the before mentioned things.

[Danno 1,228]

The problem here is, folks want to get rid of Affirmative Action and minority exclusive organizations, but don't want to fix the inherent racism that precedes the before mentioned things.

What you call racism might be simply a "inequality of outcomes."

When you proceed on the notion that all groups are equally gifted, in appearance, intelligence, ability, creativity or preparation... then you must conclude that life should work as a gum-ball machine (Every sixth gumball coming out will be blue).

That 13% of astronauts will be black as well as 13% of engineers singers or 100 meter sprinters. Any other variant is just more evidence of White-priviliage.

In other words if "equality of outcome" is not achieved, then Blacks should be free to compete in both contests, those exclusive to Blacks and also the racist ones, those open to all. At least until we reach that time when the Blue gumball comes out every 6th time.

The problem is life is not a gumball machine, and we are not all 5 millimeters. There are Market forces in play, subjective and objective measures in certain things.

As I always like to leave you with a question, answer this honestly.

IN all those contests where you feel not enough Blacks are chosen, lets suppose Black and ONLY Blacks were allowed to vote for

-Best Actor

-President

-Best Hip hop artist

-Prom king

-Beauty pageant winner.

What do you suppose we would see?

[We Keep Receipts 9,238]

What you call racism might be simply a "inequality of outcomes."

When you proceed on the notion that all groups are equally gifted, in appearance, intelligence, ability, creativity or preparation... then you must conclude that life should work as a gum-ball machine (Every sixth gumball coming out will be blue).

That 13% of astronauts will be black as well as 13% of engineers singers or 100 meter sprinters. Any other variant is just more evidence of White-priviliage.

In other words if "equality of outcome" is not achieved, then Blacks should be free to compete in both contests, those exclusive to Blacks and also the racist ones, those open to all. At least until we reach that time when the Blue gumball comes out every 6th time.

The problem is life is not a gumball machine, and we are not all 5 millimeters. There are Market forces in play, subjective and objective measures in certain things.

As I always like to leave you with a question, answer this honestly.

IN all those contests where you feel not enough Blacks are chosen, lets suppose Black and ONLY Blacks were allowed to vote for

-Best Actor

-President

-Best Hip hop artist

-Prom king

-Beauty pageant winner.

What do you suppose we would see?

You should be judged on merit and achievement, not the color of your skin. I'll give you an example:

Folks here and IRL say that in order to beat racism, all you have to do is be good at what you do and be productive in society. So, how come when blacks exceed in those areas, why aren't they chosen? When you have the number one show for 5 years running in America(Cosby Show) and not a single actor/actress gets the Emmy, how do you change that? When your movie gets world wide acclaim, but you can't get an Oscar(Color Purple) how do you change that? When you not only meet but exceed the standard, and still can't get promoted or an award, how do you change that?

[mota bhai 2,675]

Marvin,

Do you enjoy wasting your time?

[We Keep Receipts 9,238]

Marvin,

Do you enjoy wasting your time?

Yes, but if I can open someone ´s eyes, it's worth it.

[The Nature Boy 4,224]

You should be judged on merit and achievement, not the color of your skin. I'll give you an example:

Folks here and IRL say that in order to beat racism, all you have to do is be good at what you do and be productive in society. So, how come when blacks exceed in those areas, why aren't they chosen? When you have the number one show for 5 years running in America(Cosby Show) and not a single actor/actress gets the Emmy, how do you change that? When your movie gets world wide acclaim, but you can't get an Oscar(Color Purple) how do you change that? When you not only meet but exceed the standard, and still can't get promoted or an award, how do you change that?

When you have to be President for a few weeks before anyone will give you a Nobel Peace Prize that proves discrimination is alive and well.

Yes Cosby's number one running show for 5 years....How is that possible if society is so racist...Logic would dictate that if Racism is so rampant it could not be number one for 5 years in a row.--P.S. the show itself did win several, plus many globes and peoples choice awards.

Color Purple did not win an Oscar--That proves america is racist -- Really..Sigh

That kind of convoluted everything is racist absurdity is why so many white people are so sick of hearing racism as an excuse for every problem that affects black America.

P.S. How is everything .. Did your wife get to go. I fear that day coming at my house

[I AM NOT THAT GUY 5,715]

Yes, but if I can open someone ´s eyes, it's worth it.

I use toothpicks.