Jump to content
I AM NOT THAT GUY

Catholics cheer pope's remarks on gays, abortion

 Share

29 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

You read a few chosen headlines and your support is won, why am I not surprised?

Nothing has changed.

:lol: Yes, Danno. Of course you'd assume that this is literally the only thing I've ever read or heard about in regards to this Pope.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Russia
Timeline

laughing.gif Yes, Danno. Of course you'd assume that this is literally the only thing I've ever read or heard about in regards to this Pope.

Apparently so, unless you approve of me too, he has said nothing I have not said.

type2homophobia_zpsf8eddc83.jpg




"Those people who will not be governed by God


will be ruled by tyrants."



William Penn

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ukraine
Timeline

What can I say, I'm a renaissance man. wink.png

Lets just hope you never run into a real bear....when you are alone...carrying a .32 auto concealed

You will be fine as long as there is someone with you that you can shoot in the kneecap with that thing and RUN. Keep it concealed so no one figures out your plan to sacrifice them to save yourself. You are an attorney, teacher, minister and gun maker...you MUST be saved!

Say a prayer for them as you RUN and plan a lawsuit against the property owner for not controlling the bears.

Edited by Gary and Alla

VERMONT! I Reject Your Reality...and Substitute My Own!

Gary And Alla

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ukraine
Timeline

Try to get out of your comfort zone & read a little more = It's in the works.

Oh I can't wait. Is there a website I can sign up for to check the progress?

VERMONT! I Reject Your Reality...and Substitute My Own!

Gary And Alla

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Philippines
Timeline

Lets just hope you never run into a real bear....when you are alone...carrying a .32 auto concealed

You will be fine as long as there is someone with you that you can shoot in the kneecap with that thing and RUN. Keep it concealed so no one figures out your plan to sacrifice them to save yourself. You are an attorney, teacher, minister and gun maker...you MUST be saved!

Say a prayer for them as you RUN and plan a lawsuit against the property owner for not controlling the bears.

Only you believe that...but why would I try to explain how wrong you are? I must admit that your ramblings on the subject amuse me like one of those monkey grinders when I was a kid.

The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. 

-John Kenneth Galbraith

 

Timeline

 5-13-2013 - I129-F Send Express to Texas

 5-15-2013 - I129-F Delivered and signed for in Lewisville Texas at USCIS

 5-17-2013 - NOA1

 5-20-2013 - Check Cashed USCIS

 8-01-2013 - NOA2  (76 Days from NOA1)

 9-20-2013 - NVC received!

10-7-2013  - Received at embassy Manila (17 days from receiving at NVC)

10-21-2013 - Passed Medical

10-25-2013 - Interview scheduled

10-25-2013 - Administrative Review

11-5-2013  -  Approved

11-13-2013 - Visa received

11-19-2013 - Leaving to PI

12-3-2013 - POE Seattle WA

12-14-2013 - Wedding Ruston Washington.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, not really. It's all talk, it'll probably never happen. The church can't afford to pay for the priests families, housing, health insurance, or their divorce settlements. It's all about the dineros with the Catholic church.

They're doing more than talking. They're allowing. Several examples include - merged Anglicans & Episcopalians with married priests into the Church. Britain's Cardinal & others are expressing support & lobbying for it. Etc...

huh.png The Catholic Church "can't afford"? laughing.gif The Catholic Church has more money than... God. tongue_ss.gif

ETA: Ludicrous to think the Church would be responsible to pay "divorce settlements". rolleyes.gif

Edited by Crashed~N2~Me
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh I can't wait. Is there a website I can sign up for to check the progress?

It's called the World Wide Web. You may have heard of it...?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They're doing more than talking. They're allowing. Several examples include - merged Anglicans & Episcopalians with married priests into the Church. Britain's Cardinal & others are expressing support & lobbying for it. Etc...

huh.png The Catholic Church "can't afford"? laughing.gif The Catholic Church has more money than... God. tongue_ss.gif

ETA: Ludicrous to think the Church would be responsible to pay "divorce settlements". rolleyes.gif

Yes, a very small number of married Anglican & Episcopalian priests have been allowed into the Catholic church as a show of unity amongst Christians. That is not however an indication that the Catholic Church is shifting it's policies for it's Catholic Priests. Catholic priests are still not allowed to marry and there is nothing to indicate that this will change any time soon.

The Catholic church is nowhere near as rich as it used to be. They have been losing followers and money in droves for the past 4 decades due to pedophilia in the church and advances in science that show the possibility of there ever having been a God to be miniscule. They are closing churches and selling off properties by the thousands to remain liquid.

Why is it ludicrous to think the Catholic church would be paying for a married priest's divorce settlement? Isn't it part of the Church's responsibility to house, feed and take care of the preists day to day needs, including their living expenses? Who's going to end up paying for the divorce lawyers, child support and alimony, if the Church doesn't pay it? Are the Priests going to flip burgers at Wendy's during the night shift? You'd be naive to think that the ex-spouses wouldn't also attempt to sue the church for support and that the church wouldn't be named as defendants in these cases also.

Edited by Teddy B
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1) Yes, a very small number of married Anglican & Episcopalian priests have been allowed into the Catholic church as a show of unity amongst Christians. That is not however an indication that the Catholic Church is shifting it's policies for it's Catholic Priests. Catholic priests are still not allowed to marry and there is nothing to indicate that this will change any time soon.

2) The Catholic church is nowhere near as rich as it used to be. They have been losing followers and money in droves for the past 4 decades due to pedophilia in the church and advances in science that show the possibility of there ever having been a God to be miniscule. They are closing churches and selling off properties by the thousands to remain liquid.

3) Why is it ludicrous to think the Catholic church would be paying for a married priest's divorce settlement? Isn't it part of the Church's responsibility to house, feed and take care of the preists day to day needs, including their living expenses? Who's going to end up paying for the divorce lawyers, child support and alimony, if the Church doesn't pay it? Are the Priests going to flip burgers at Wendy's during the night shift? You'd be naive to think that the ex-spouses wouldn't also attempt to sue the church for support and that the church wouldn't be named as defendants in these cases also.

1) The size doesn't matter. The fact these were allowed is an indicator. The Pope stating celibacy is not a dogma is an even bigger indicator.

2) I am sure you recognize - the Church is not the Vatican. Worldwide estimates of income = excess of 500 Billion annually. "The Economist" estimates US expenses of 170+ Billion. Add in global assets = The Church is not even near broke.

3) Diocesan priests receive a salary package. A married Diocesan priest would have a similar package to = Lutherans, Methodists, Baptists...etc. The Catholic church would be no more obligated in picking up the divorce tab than any of those examples = none. Your argument is more applicable to "religious priests".

I have been on the phone today with a couple of men on the "inside". They state that Yes - there is a clear signal sent by this Pope & various Cardinals /Archbishops / Bishops - that an open mind to married priests is present state & seems to be heading towards reality BUT seeing that happen anytime soon (one stated "probably not in my lifetime" - he is 68 years old) = very slim chance.

That means - Although I am correct regarding indicators - propensity of fact = I am wrong on time frame. I concede this debate regarding married priests is "in the works" & I acknowledge my statement was "overstated / exaggerated".

Thanks for the conversation - I am better informed now. good.gif

Edited by Crashed~N2~Me
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Russia
Timeline

1) The size doesn't matter. The fact these were allowed is an indicator. The Pope stating celibacy is not a dogma is an even bigger indicator.

2) I am sure you recognize - the Church is not the Vatican. Worldwide estimates of income = excess of 500 Billion annually. "The Economist" estimates US expenses of 170+ Billion. Add in global assets = The Church is not even near broke.

3) Diocesan priests receive a salary package. A married Diocesan priest would have a similar package to = Lutherans, Methodists, Baptists...etc. The Catholic church would be no more obligated in picking up the divorce tab than any of those examples = none. Your argument is more applicable to "religious priests".

I have been on the phone today with a couple of men on the "inside". They state that Yes - there is a clear signal sent by this Pope & various Cardinals /Archbishops / Bishops - that an open mind to married priests is present state & seems to be heading towards reality BUT seeing that happen anytime soon (one stated "probably not in my lifetime" - he is 68 years old) = very slim chance.

That means - Although I am correct regarding indicators - propensity of fact = I am wrong on time frame. I concede this debate regarding married priests is "in the works" & I acknowledge my statement was "overstated / exaggerated".

Thanks for the conversation - I am better informed now. good.gif

You and I see the same Church and yet project different future events.

IMO it is because you look with a short horizon and from a Euro-centric angle.

THe RCC is in free fall, a trajectory that began with 2nd vatican where "Tradition and form" was shelved for becoming a bit more hip.

When you look at the number of people who left since that robust era it can be described as no other way than a colossal error.

THe Catholic Church is not the only example of this, Main line Protestant faiths such have Episcopalian also left their footings and faced monumental decline which only got worse with their Gays marriage change.

WHat churches have grown? Conservative, evangelical Churches. Catholic CHurches which are more traditional.

The Catholic Church is so jacked up now that it is possible they could veer a little farther left but as the West is a dying source of future influence we must look to where the Church is growing and even thriving and speculate what those future generations will demand in a church.

THere will be a show-down in the Catholic Church and a purging within a few decades or Plan B will go into effect.

african_women_scholarship_program_group_

type2homophobia_zpsf8eddc83.jpg




"Those people who will not be governed by God


will be ruled by tyrants."



William Penn

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...