Jump to content

4 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: IR-5 Country: Jordan
Timeline
Posted

My mom got rejected for a i-130 ir5, parent of a US citizen, visa due to misrepresentation under Section 212 (A) (6) ©. What happened was I (in the United States) received a letter from the Department of State, Refugee Processing Center, stating that since she was originally from Iraq, she qualified for resettlement. They said that they wanted to inform us about a program that might make my beneficiary (my mother) eligible to resettle in the United States while her I-130 finished processing.

Our I-130 got approved on December 18, 2012 by the USCIS, and it was sent to the NVC for further processing. Like I said, that's when we received a letter from the refugee center on January 24, stating that if we apply for refugee asylum, we can get my mother to the United States faster while we finish the I-130. Towards the end of the letter, it tells us "...if your relative is denied refugee resettlement, he or she will be eligible for I-130 processing, provided that they were not found to be permanently inadmissible to the United States..." We also called the NVC to verify and did our part on verifying what we heard.

We knew this was more or less a shot in the dark, and didn't have a lot of hope in this option. But we figured we would do it anyways, since we were under the impression that there would be no affect to the I-130. My mother was rejected for refugee status, due to the fact that she wasn't being persecuted and she had already resettled in Jordan. Okay, no big deal.

Then today, she went to the Embassy for her appointment where she would get her visa, and be able to join me in the United States. According to her, the man reviewing her information was very polite and courteous, and everything seemed to be going smoothly, until he opened her files and rejected her right away and told her she was "permanently inadmissible to the United States under Section 212(A)(6)©", which is simply called "misrepresentation".

As far as I understand everything, there was clearly no misrepresentation. My mother told them during the refugee interview that she wasn't being persecuted, therefore she didn't misrepresent herself or lie. She was already "resettled" in Jordan, so applying for resettlement wouldn't have make sense. The letter stated that there would be no affect to the I-130 (whether she is rejected or not as a refugee), and we were told not to retain an attorney. To make matters worse, my mother told me that she didn't fill out any forms when she was at the refugee appointment, only signed a paper telling her that she could choose to resettle elsewhere if she was rejected, and that this wasn't an interview to do anything other than reunite her with me, her son. After the interview, she signed a paper saying that everything she said in the interview itself was correct and truthful.

Our options, as far as we understand them right now, are to 1) File a I-601, 2) Appeal the decision (is that an option?), or 3) Resubmit the entire packet (although I am not sure this would work because she is permanently inadmissible). What should I do? Part of me believes that the Embassy is completely out of line here, and citing this as 'misrepresentation' is a long shot, considering that they were the ones who were misrepresenting themselves, and misguiding us.

Posted

You should speak to an experienced immigration attorney ASAP.

Widow/er AoS Guide | Have AoS questions? Read (some) answers here

 

AoS

Day 0 (4/23/12) Petitions mailed (I-360, I-485, I-765)
2 (4/25/12) Petitions delivered to Chicago Lockbox
11 (5/3/12) Received 3 paper NOAs
13 (5/5/12) Received biometrics appointment for 5/23
15 (5/7/12) Did an unpleasant walk-in biometrics in Fort Worth, TX
45 (6/7/12) Received email & text notification of an interview on 7/10
67 (6/29/12) EAD production ordered
77 (7/9/12) Received EAD
78 (7/10/12) Interview
100 (8/1/12) I-485 transferred to Vermont Service Centre
143 (9/13/12) Contacted DHS Ombudsman
268 (1/16/13) I-360, I-485 consolidated and transferred to Dallas
299 (2/16/13) Received second interview letter for 3/8
319 (3/8/13) Approved at interview
345 (4/3/13) I-360, I-485 formally approved; green card production ordered
353 (4/11/13) Received green card

 

Naturalisation

Day 0 (1/3/18) N-400 filed online

Day 6 (1/9/18) Walk-in biometrics in Fort Worth, TX

Day 341 (12/10/18) Interview was scheduled for 1/14/19

Day 376 (1/14/19) Interview

Day 385 (1/23/19) Denied

Day 400 (2/7/19) Denial revoked; N-400 approved; oath ceremony set for 2/14/19

Day 407 (2/14/19) Oath ceremony in Dallas, TX

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Nigeria
Timeline
Posted

What has happened is very serious and not something you should ever try as a do it yourself thing I would not be looking for the very best representation. The site immigrate2us.net or the name Marc Ellis ( vj member ID ellisisland ) pop into my head . Even if you can't afford the very best , at least pay for a consulate with the very best ( who are actually sometimes cheaper than the fool on main street with an immigration sign )

This will not be over quickly. You will not enjoy this.

Filed: Other Country: Brazil
Timeline
Posted (edited)

duodedi the Information provided by the Department of State was correct, because Iraqi beneficiaries of approved I-130 petitions may pursue immigrant visa processing and refugee resettlement through the P2 Iraqi Refugee Program simultaneously, without any prejudice in case of denial under that program. The Department of State sent 7.000 letters to petitioners of approved I-130 petitions with Iraqi beneficiaries. Your mother will not have a problem to get her visa, there is no misrepresentation at all . Call the Embassy tomorrow to explain her situation and send them copy of the letter that you mother received from Department of State Letter, because it seemed they were "sleeping" when they received instructions regarding this matter,lol.

I am sending you through pm the" Iraqi Refugee Processing fact Sheet" published for the Department of State in 2011, and it clearly states that relatives pursuing refugee processing under P2 Iraqi Refugee program will not compromise their immigrant petition.

Edited by sandranj
 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...