Obama: We Don’t Have an Urgent Deficit Crisis

[Teddy B 17,252]

He likes to put his ignorance on display. Or he likes to look ridiculous. Or both. Not that I actually care which it is.

It appears that neither does he.

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

It appears that neither does he.

true.

[Harpa Timsah 13,258]

It's sad that math is hard for people... comparing percentages to raw numbers and thinking they are the same

[Jacque67 7,328]

It's sad that math is hard for people... comparing percentages to raw numbers and thinking they are the same

And these people claim to have worked for the army. Help!

[Penny Lane 8,159]

A. Bush's fault . can also be "conjure up any conservative in history that even remotely did anything similar to what is going on today. It makes it ok.

So now people can't discuss Bush even if the conversation is about the deficit of previous Presidents?

I'm convinced you don't even read what you're responding to most of the time. You just can't wait to post a letter whether it fits or not.

[JohnR! 5,495]

So now people can't discuss Bush even if the conversation is about the deficit of previous Presidents?

I'm convinced you don't even read what you're responding to most of the time. You just can't wait to post a letter whether it fits or not.

[Penny Lane 8,159]

That image doesn't exactly fit into this convo, but okay.

[JohnR! 5,495]

That image doesn't exactly fit into this convo, but okay.

Just a reminder... Some seem to think everything was in order when Obama was inaugurated president...

[The Nature Boy 4,224]

So now people can't discuss Bush even if the conversation is about the deficit of previous Presidents?

I'm convinced you don't even read what you're responding to most of the time. You just can't wait to post a letter whether it fits or not.

Let me sum up the whole reply- ohhh Reagan had a much worse deficit Hence. The it's ok some pub did to. It is not ok that Obama is exploding the debt just cause Bush and Reagan did. They were also wrong

Not only are you Larry and curly freaking slower than dumb and dumber you are arrogant about it

[Teddy B 17,252]

Let me sum up the whole reply- ohhh Reagan had a much worse deficit Hence. The it's ok some pub did to. It is not ok that Obama is exploding the debt just cause Bush and Reagan did. They were also wrong

Not only are you Larry and curly freaking slower than dumb and dumber you are arrogant about it

I guess your "following the rules" has come to an abrupt end.

It's always humorous to watch someone with less than average intelligence attempt to criticize someone smarter than themselves with nothing but hollow insults.

[Penny Lane 8,159]

Let me sum up the whole reply- ohhh Reagan had a much worse deficit Hence. The it's ok some pub did to. It is not ok that Obama is exploding the debt just cause Bush and Reagan did. They were also wrong

Not only are you Larry and curly freaking slower than dumb and dumber you are arrogant about it

Listen, you're the one who posted some bullsh*t letter response where once again, it didn't fit.

You aren't even reading what you're arguing about. If you are, you aren't understanding it. Oh, there goes another personal attack. Hit the report button.

But first, read the post you responded to with the "it's all Bush's fault" garbage.

Show me where it even remotely suggests that it's okay that Obama is "exploding the debt because Bush and Reagan did."

NOWHERE.

The conversation was about whether Obama had accumulated more debt than all of his predecessors combined.

It wasn't about what was acceptable and what wasn't.

You are the one who looks stupid. You can focus on my response to you, but I'm not the only one who thinks so. Maybe you should take a step back and think before you post your letter nonsense that you believe is clever, but just makes you look even sillier.

I guess your "following the rules" has come to an abrupt end.

It's always humorous to watch someone with less than average intelligence attempt to criticize someone smarter than themselves with nothing but hollow insults.

Isn't it funny when someone who gripes and whines about personal attacks instead of intelligent responses comes out and posts a personal attack instead of an intelligent response?

Isn't there a letter for that?

Edited August 27, 2013 by Penny Lane

[The Nature Boy 4,224]

Listen, you're the one who posted some bullsh*t letter response where once again, it didn't fit.

You aren't even reading what you're arguing about. If you are, you aren't understanding it. Oh, there goes another personal attack. Hit the report button.

But first, read the post you responded to with the "it's all Bush's fault" garbage.

Show me where it even remotely suggests that it's okay that Obama is "exploding the debt because Bush and Reagan did."

NOWHERE.

The conversation was about whether Obama had accumulated more debt all of his predecessors combined.

You are the one who looks stupid. You can focus on my response to you, but I'm not the only one who thinks so. Maybe you should take a step back and think before you post your letter nonsense that you believe is clever, but just makes you look even sillier.

Isn't it funny when someone who gripes and whines about personal attacks instead of intelligent responses comes out and posts a personal attack instead of an intelligent response?

Isn't there a letter for that?

If you think that was a personal attack then you have a compression problem. A for everyone agreeing with you. Sorry princess. Most conservatives are at work. And the progressive men just suck up to you. Because you like to tell us all bout your passion for ####### sex. Which btw I find nauseating.

[Penny Lane 8,159]

If you think that was a personal attack then you have a compression problem. A for everyone agreeing with you. Sorry princess. Most conservatives are at work. And the progressive men just suck up to you. Because you like to tell us all bout your passion for ####### sex. Which btw I find nauseating.

Wait, so me saying you have a comprehension problem was a personal attack the other day. But now you call me dumb and me thinking that's a personal attack is me having a "compression" problem?

As for the bolded part ... that was a joke that spooky started. You really must have a learning disability.

I mean, you've got to be f*cking kidding me now.

Edited August 27, 2013 by Penny Lane

[Teddy B 17,252]

Listen, you're the one who posted some bullsh*t letter response where once again, it didn't fit.

You aren't even reading what you're arguing about. If you are, you aren't understanding it. Oh, there goes another personal attack. Hit the report button.

But first, read the post you responded to with the "it's all Bush's fault" garbage.

Show me where it even remotely suggests that it's okay that Obama is "exploding the debt because Bush and Reagan did."

NOWHERE.

The conversation was about whether Obama had accumulated more debt than all of his predecessors combined.

It wasn't about what was acceptable and what wasn't.

You are the one who looks stupid. You can focus on my response to you, but I'm not the only one who thinks so. Maybe you should take a step back and think before you post your letter nonsense that you believe is clever, but just makes you look even sillier.

Isn't it funny when someone who gripes and whines about personal attacks instead of intelligent responses comes out and posts a personal attack instead of an intelligent response?

Isn't there a letter for that?

I believe the letter is F for Fail.

[decocker 7,198]

If you think that was a personal attack then you have a compression problem. A for everyone agreeing with you. Sorry princess. Most conservatives are at work. And the progressive men just suck up to you. Because you like to tell us all bout your passion for ####### sex. Which btw I find nauseating.

a compression problem and passionate ####### sex.

most conservatives are at work..

overwhelming hilarity.