Jump to content

355 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Posted

Me too.

Wait, what are we talking about?

mellow.png

we already knew about you..G and D I am shocked

Posted

Risk assessment is not done with one thing in mind or being already biased.

Its just funny how libs think if they produce some stats they are valid if someone else produced the stats with whom they do not agree than its all bogus.

It's gif time!!

illK6U.gif

Harvard School of Public Health. Hopefully they're an acceptable source.

http://www.hsph.harvard.edu/hicrc/firearms-research/gun-ownership-and-use/

They are a big customer of ours, the entire Harvard University is.

Posted

Harvard School of Public Health. Hopefully they're an acceptable source.

http://www.hsph.harvard.edu/hicrc/firearms-research/gun-ownership-and-use/

actually the paper makes a bunch of claims but links to no data

Posted

In case the Harvard link is somehow unacceptable...

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/04/130405064029.htm

Residents of states with the highest rates of gun ownership and political conservatism are at greater risk of suicide than those in states with less gun ownership and less politically conservative leanings, according to a study by University of California, Riverside sociology professor Augustine J. Kposowa.

Posted (edited)

In case the Harvard link is somehow unacceptable...

Title..

Suicide Risk Linked to Rates of Gun Ownership, Political Conservatism

Age adjusted

Oh dear god youare kidding right

here are some jewels from this person

1, Firearms are the most commonly used method of suicide by males and poisoning the most common among females.-Guess females did not get the guns cause suicide memo.

2.Firearm ownership, conservatism (measured by percentage voting for former President George W. Bush in the 2000 election), suicide rate, church adherence, and the immigration rate were measured at the state level--WTH where did they come up with lumping those together..Immigration rate.

3. With few exceptions, states with the highest rates of gun ownership -- for example, Alaska, Montana, Wyoming, Idaho, Alabama, and West Virginia -- also tended to have the highest suicide rates. These states were also carried overwhelmingly by George Bush in the 2000 presidential election.--Translation--We ignored the data that did not back up this garbage study

Edited by The conciliator
Posted

And is there any it does. Notice the article presents no evidence it does,just tries to prove a negative.

Sorry fail

The study looked at ALL THE AVAILABLE DATA and CONCLUDED that there is NO EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT the proposition. YET the NRA would have us believe that there is evidence of a minimum of 2.5 Million such cases. Someone is trying to pull a fast one here. I wonder who that could be? Bear in mind that the person who produced this study did not go in with an agenda, his field is risk assessment not 'I hate guns'. Also bear in mind that after producing this study of risk his recommendations do not include any attempt at legislating compliance to a 'no gun in the home' policy. Does that tell you anything at all?

Refusing to use the spellchick!

I have put you on ignore. No really, I have, but you are still ruining my enjoyment of this site. .

Posted

Title..

Suicide Risk Linked to Rates of Gun Ownership, Political Conservatism

Age adjusted

Oh dear god youare kidding right

Are you reading the study, or did you stop reading at the title? I'll take a guess and say you stopped reading at the title.

Do me a favor. Google "gun ownership and suicide rates"

You let me know what you find, okay?

Posted

Risk assessment is not done with one thing in mind or being already biased.

Its just funny how libs think if they produce some stats they are valid if someone else produced the stats with whom they do not agree than its all bogus.

Indeed, risk assessment is just that, an assessment of risk.

Produce your stats. The stats that having a gun in the home poses a significant risk are now out there, where are the stats that support your argument?

Refusing to use the spellchick!

I have put you on ignore. No really, I have, but you are still ruining my enjoyment of this site. .

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...