Jump to content

3 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Thailand
Timeline
Posted

Justice Department and six states, including Texas, sue to block US Airways-American Airlines merger; carriers vow to fight

HortonandParker.jpg

American Airlines' Tom Horton, left, and US Airways CEO Doug Parker following the announcing the two airlines' merger in the Terminal D Admiral's Club at Dallas-Fort Worth International Airport on February 14. (Tom Fox/Staff photographer)

The U.S. Department of Justice has filed a lawsuit Tuesday to block the planned merger of US Airways and American Airlines. Six states have joined Justice, including Texas, as has the District of Columbia.

The lawsuit was filed in U.S. District Court in the District of Columbia. It alleges violations of federal antitrust laws.

The two carriers defiantly announced soon afterward “We will vigorously defend the merger in court.”

Said the Justice Department in its filing:

Millions of passengers depend on the airline industry to travel quickly, efficiently, and safely between various cities in the United States and throughout the world. Since 1978, the nation has relied on competition among airlines to promote affordability, innovation, and service and quality improvements.

In recent years, however, the major airlines have, in tandem, raised fares, imposed new and higher fees, and reduced service. Competition has diminished and consumers have paid a heavy price.

This merger—by creating the world’s largest airline— would, in the words of US Airways’ management, “finish[ ] industry evolution.” It would reduce the number of major domestic airlines from five to four, and the number of “legacy” airlines—today, Delta, United, American, and US Airways—from four to three. In so doing, it threatens substantial harm to consumers.

Because of the size of the airline industry, if this merger were approved, even a small increase in the price of airline tickets, checked bags, or flight change fees would cause hundreds of millions of dollars of harm to American consumers annually.

The two states that hold the headquarters of American Airlines and US Airways – Texas and Arizona – are joning Florida, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Virginia, the District of Columbia and the U.S. Department of Justice in seeking to block the two carriers’ merger.

Pennsylvania also has a US Airways hub in Philadelphia, while Florida holds American Airlines’ Miami hub. Virginia is home to Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport, where US Airways had more than 55 percent of the takeoff and landing rights.

Here’s what Abbott’s office said in its announcement:

Today’s legal action was prompted by the State’s concerns about the potential for reduced airline service to several of Texas’ smaller airports that are currently served exclusively by American Airlines and American Eagle flights. In recent years, U.S. Airways has pursued a “capacity discipline” strategy, a business model that relies upon substantial reductions in both service and capacity – a phenomenon that has followed each significant legacy airline merger in recent years. If this strategy is continued when U.S. Airways’ executives take over leadership at the new American Airlines, some areas in rural Texas could see their travel options reduced as a result of the merger.

American Airlines and U.S. Airways compete directly on thousands of heavily traveled nonstop and connecting routes, including nearly 200 routes beginning or ending in Texas cities. According to the State’s antitrust complaint, the proposed merger would result in decreased competition, higher airfares and fees, reduced service and downgraded amenities. The dollar impact nationwide could exceed $100 million a year.

The merger would make a combined U.S. Airways/American Airlines the largest worldwide carrier and reduce the number of the larger “legacy” airlines from four to three – U.S. Airways/American, United/Continental and Delta/Northwest – and the number of major airlines from five to four. If the merger were approved, the three remaining legacy airlines combined with Southwest Airlines would account for more than 80 percent of domestic travel.

The Justice Department previously had approved three previous mergers of major carriers: Delta Air Lines and Northwest Airlines in 2008, United Airlines and Continental Airlines in 2010 and Southwest Airlines and AirTran Airways in 2011.

The Delta merger moved American Airlines to No. 2 in size, and the United merger pushed it to No. 3 — the size that Delta and United each had been when they proposed their mergers with smaller rivals.

But the American-US Airways apparently was one merger too far for the Justice Department.

The last time the Justice Department planned a lawsuit to stop a merger of major air carriers, it came after US Airways and United announced a proposed marriage in May 2000. It took until July 2001 for Justice antitrust lawyers to review and then file suit to block the combination.

“Airline travel is vital to millions of American consumers who fly regularly for either business or pleasure,” Attorney General Eric Holder said in the department’s announcement.

“By challenging this merger, the Department of Justice is saying that the American people deserve better,” Holder said. “This transaction would result in consumers paying the price – in higher airfares, higher fees and fewer choices. Today’s action proves our determination to fight for the best interests of consumers by ensuring robust competition in the marketplace.”

The action comes just two days before AMR and American Airlines head to U.S. Bankruptcy Court in New York City to ask Bankruptcy Judge Sean Lane to confirm their plan of reorganization.

The deal had already cleared two hurdles. US Airways shareholders voted July 12 to approve the merger. And unsecured creditors of American, AMR and American Eagle and AMR shareholders overwhelmingly approved the plan of reorganization in voting that ended July 29.

In addition, the European Commission last week approved the merger after wangling one concession: the surrender of some operating rights so some rival could begin Philadelphia-London Heathrow service.

But the Department of Justice has been silent publicly since the chairmen and chief executives of the two carriers, Tom Horton of American and Doug Parker of US Airways, announced the deal early on the morning of Feb. 14.

Their boards had approved the merger late the day before. At the time, it was valued at $11 billion, based on US Airways’ stock price and the fact that US Airways shareholders would own 28 percent of the new American Airlines Group.

US Airways shares were down about 8 percent around 10 a.m. AMR shares, trading as AAMRQ, dropped nearly 30 percent.

US Airways-American Airlines Complaint by Robert Wilonsky

Source:

http://aviationblog.dallasnews.com/2013/08/justice-department-files-suit-to-block-the-us-airways-american-airlines-merger.html/

You can click on the 'X' to the right to ignore this signature.

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: China
Timeline
Posted

Is interesting the feds waited this long, not filing on 15 FEB 2013.

Slacktards.

Sometimes my language usage seems confusing - please feel free to 'read it twice', just in case !
Ya know, you can find the answer to your question with the advanced search tool, when using a PC? Ditch the handphone, come back later on a PC, and try again.

-=-=-=-=-=R E A D ! ! !=-=-=-=-=-

Whoa Nelly ! Want NVC Info? see http://www.visajourney.com/wiki/index.php/NVC_Process

Congratulations on your approval ! We All Applaud your accomplishment with Most Wonderful Kissies !

 

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted

The wrong airline typically seems to buy the right airline.

TWA bought Ozark.

American bought TWA.

Useless (USAir) bought Piedmont.

And, most recently and tragically, United bought Continental. Merger, my hindquarters.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...