SD Mayor's 2 wk. Sexual Harassment Therapy ends Early

[Gary and Alla 3,694]

http://news.yahoo.com/san-diego-mayors-two-week-sexual-harassment-therapy-041035524.html

Oh goodie. He is such a clever guy that he only needs one week of therapy and a vacation. and you gotta love a Mayor that begs.

I am still at a loss as to how Ms. Johnson feels her work performance will be enhanced if she did wear panties

[Peikko 1,575]

What a complete plonker, I am sure everyone is convinced that a week is enough to 'fix' his problems.

As for you Gary, what are you talking about? The mayor made a completely inappropriate suggestion to a female colleague and you interpret that as the woman saying she would perform better if she did wear underwear? She didn't make any claims about job performance and underwear Gary, not one thing.

[Danno 1,228]

I'm trying to think if there are any democrats at all who got more than the time-out chair for treating women as play toys or worse...... and I can't think of one.

This guy will recover and feminist will vote for him (They LOVED Clinton).

It's not that the Left does not have standards, they are just based on different things, such as, recycling, abortion and sodomy.

Edited August 11, 2013 by Danno

[Gary and Alla 3,694]

What a complete plonker, I am sure everyone is convinced that a week is enough to 'fix' his problems.

As for you Gary, what are you talking about? The mayor made a completely inappropriate suggestion to a female colleague and you interpret that as the woman saying she would perform better if she did wear underwear? She didn't make any claims about job performance and underwear Gary, not one thing.

Yes she did.

He said she would perform better without panties. She disagrees. She thinks she will perform better WITH panties.

How?

Am I the only feminist outraged by this man's behavior?

[Gary and Alla 3,694]

I'm trying to think if there are any democrats at all who got more than the time-out chair for treating women as play toys or worse...... and I can't think of one.

This guy will recover and feminist will vote for him (They LOVED Clinton).

It's not that the Left does not have standards, they are just based on different things, such as, recycling, abortion and sodomy.

As long as he believes women are unable to pay for their own birth control and that someone else should be forced to provide it for them, he will get the phony feminists to vote for him

[Jacque67 7,328]

I think certain posters are getting turned on by the image of a female member of staff not wearing underwear . What can I say except PATHETIC

[Gary and Alla 3,694]

I think certain posters are getting turned on by the image of a female member of staff not wearing underwear . What can I say except PATHETIC

Not sure who. I much prefer to leave the panties on and just move them over to the side. I might have something to object to if she were wearing that "pantyhose" stuff. That doesn't come into our house.

Alla got to rule out McDonald's, Coca Cola and ice in our house, I ruled out pantyhose, tennis shoes for women and sweatpants/shirts. We each get equal strikes of undesireables, she never wore any of that anyway junk so it was a good deal for her.

But the question was how her job would be imporved by panties.No suggestions yet.

[Darnell 8,478]

Sheesh. Can't these fellas WAIT until the yearly STATE Democratic Convention? Lots of tail available then, the negotiation methods are always better, and no one tattles.

#######?

[Peikko 1,575]

Yes she did.

He said she would perform better without panties. She disagrees. She thinks she will perform better WITH panties.

How?

Am I the only feminist outraged by this man's behavior?

Only in your fantasy Gary . I guess you think it was some kind of in office banter, the mayor saying 'hey Jackson did you ever think your performance would improve if you didn't wear underwear' and her quipping back, 'you are wrong Mr mayor, my performance is much better with them.' That is not what happened Gary,; this was not a conversation, this was a dickhead who has no idea how to work along side women making lewd and inappropriate comments to women who were made to feel extremely uncomfortable and subjugated. The fact that you want to indulge in this fantasy conversation where the victim is supposed to justify something she never said nor implied is at best your own misjudgement as to the nature of the abuse these women were forced to tolerate. This also rather betrays the fact that you would or could be a champion for women being treated appropriately in the work place. Pathetic.

[Gary and Alla 3,694]

Only in your fantasy Gary . I guess you think it was some kind of in office banter, the mayor saying 'hey Jackson did you ever think your performance would improve if you didn't wear underwear' and her quipping back, 'you are wrong Mr mayor, my performance is much better with them.' That is not what happened Gary,; this was not a conversation, this was a dickhead who has no idea how to work along side women making lewd and inappropriate comments to women who were made to feel extremely uncomfortable and subjugated. The fact that you want to indulge in this fantasy conversation where the victim is supposed to justify something she never said nor implied is at best your own misjudgement as to the nature of the abuse these women were forced to tolerate. This also rather betrays the fact that you would or could be a champion for women being treated appropriately in the work place. Pathetic.

Truth, I have to tell you. After you continue to spout lies documented on other topics, I am really not inclined to discuss things at all with you. It is well documented you will simply lie over and over to defend some point. Your whole display about Swiss gun laws, when even presented with the legislation itself tells me all I want to know.

We have these men, Weiner and Filner, in the news right now who publicly urinate all over women and their wives, in the footsteps of the Great Bill Clinton and not a word is said by the usual legion of women demanding "equality" for women. Where are they? You want to banter about the semantics of what was said as I demonstrate that anything can be interpretted many ways. Huma Abedin has set women back 50 years at least with her acceptance of being publically trashed by her husband. They had barely recovered from Hillary. A woman that allows herself to be pissed all over for an obvious power and money benefit is like a hooker performing her fetish "tricks" in public. And "women's groups" say they are "brave". They are doormats, toilet paper being used to wipe their husband's bum in public...but in return get something for themselves.

The behavior of these men followed by the reaction of Democrats is no different than anything I posted. I have even seen Democrats here say that this man (Filner) is humorous, the women must be lying if it went on this long, and that there should be an X-rated parody made of it. (check my first thread on this topic) Not one Democrat has mentioned these two men in a thread. NO ONE is doing anything about "the nature of abuse these women tolerated" and now he even cuts his "treatment" in half.

This "dickhead" is a Democrat, and he is holding on to a public office in charge of millions of taxpayer $$$ and other Democrats need to tell him to GTFO! NOW. He is from the state you live in. what is the CA Dem party doing about this? Nothing.

When I see the phoney feminists and the Dem party come forward, meet with this guy and say "Here is your resignation, Sign it" then I will believe anything else they say. Anything else is nothing but a tolerance of abuse of women.

Until the Dems face these guys and say GTFO! they are doing uch more than I do injure women. Take it up with them.

[Peikko 1,575]

Truth, I have to tell you. After you continue to spout lies documented on other topics, I am really not inclined to discuss things at all with you. It is well documented you will simply lie over and over to defend some point. Your whole display about Swiss gun laws, when even presented with the legislation itself tells me all I want to know.

We have these men, Weiner and Filner, in the news right now who publicly urinate all over women and their wives, in the footsteps of the Great Bill Clinton and not a word is said by the usual legion of women demanding "equality" for women. Where are they? You want to banter about the semantics of what was said as I demonstrate that anything can be interpretted many ways. Huma Abedin has set women back 50 years at least with her acceptance of being publically trashed by her husband. They had barely recovered from Hillary. A woman that allows herself to be pissed all over for an obvious power and money benefit is like a hooker performing her fetish "tricks" in public. And "women's groups" say they are "brave". They are doormats, toilet paper being used to wipe their husband's bum in public...but in return get something for themselves.

The behavior of these men followed by the reaction of Democrats is no different than anything I posted. I have even seen Democrats here say that this man (Filner) is humorous, the women must be lying if it went on this long, and that there should be an X-rated parody made of it. (check my first thread on this topic) Not one Democrat has mentioned these two men in a thread. NO ONE is doing anything about "the nature of abuse these women tolerated" and now he even cuts his "treatment" in half.

This "dickhead" is a Democrat, and he is holding on to a public office in charge of millions of taxpayer $$$ and other Democrats need to tell him to GTFO! NOW. He is from the state you live in. what is the CA Dem party doing about this? Nothing.

When I see the phoney feminists and the Dem party come forward, meet with this guy and say "Here is your resignation, Sign it" then I will believe anything else they say. Anything else is nothing but a tolerance of abuse of women.

Until the Dems face these guys and say GTFO! they are doing uch more than I do injure women. Take it up with them.

You are responsible for the things you say Gary, no one else. You wanted to make light of a very serious issue. I called you on it, and you deflect this anywhere but onto yourself. You might fool yourself but you don''t fool anyone else.

[Gary and Alla 3,694]

You are responsible for the things you say Gary, no one else. You wanted to make light of a very serious issue. I called you on it, and you deflect this anywhere but onto yourself. You might fool yourself but you don''t fool anyone else.

Caught wth no answer again. At least you managed to croak out more than one word and a punctuation mark.

See what your state's Dem party does with the guy. See if you can find even ONE other Democrat to condemn what this man does. Let's here them weigh in on Anthony Weiner, the virtual raincoater, running for Mayor of New York as a Dem. Its a serious issue then why does a non-Dem need to be the one posting about it?

[Danno 1,228]

Truth, I have to tell you. After you continue to spout lies documented on other topics, I am really not inclined to discuss things at all with you. It is well documented you will simply lie over and over to defend some point. Your whole display about Swiss gun laws, when even presented with the legislation itself tells me all I want to know.

We have these men, Weiner and Filner, in the news right now who publicly urinate all over women and their wives, in the footsteps of the Great Bill Clinton and not a word is said by the usual legion of women demanding "equality" for women. Where are they? You want to banter about the semantics of what was said as I demonstrate that anything can be interpretted many ways. Huma Abedin has set women back 50 years at least with her acceptance of being publically trashed by her husband. They had barely recovered from Hillary. A woman that allows herself to be pissed all over for an obvious power and money benefit is like a hooker performing her fetish "tricks" in public. And "women's groups" say they are "brave". They are doormats, toilet paper being used to wipe their husband's bum in public...but in return get something for themselves.

The behavior of these men followed by the reaction of Democrats is no different than anything I posted. I have even seen Democrats here say that this man (Filner) is humorous, the women must be lying if it went on this long, and that there should be an X-rated parody made of it. (check my first thread on this topic) Not one Democrat has mentioned these two men in a thread. NO ONE is doing anything about "the nature of abuse these women tolerated" and now he even cuts his "treatment" in half.

This "dickhead" is a Democrat, and he is holding on to a public office in charge of millions of taxpayer $$$ and other Democrats need to tell him to GTFO! NOW. He is from the state you live in. what is the CA Dem party doing about this? Nothing.

When I see the phoney feminists and the Dem party come forward, meet with this guy and say "Here is your resignation, Sign it" then I will believe anything else they say. Anything else is nothing but a tolerance of abuse of women.

Until the Dems face these guys and say GTFO! they are doing uch more than I do injure women. Take it up with them.

Gary, even when the uproar does gets loud enough and they do say "he has to go".....

They welcome his resurrection in the next election cycle.

To be fair, this guy is no CLINTON. Clinton was using State police to corral women (also state workers) to his hotel room for fun and frolic, even if they had to be cajoled into it.

And he is seen as the ROCK STAR of the left, a defender of womens rights.

His wife who stood by him through bimbo after bimbo embarrassment is traveling the world preaching on the rights and elevation of women and will be the feminists choice in 2016.

Trust me neither of my "old fashion" pre feminist Grand mothers would have put up with that stuff privately or publicly for five minutes, yet we are told -Women are stronger now thanks to feminism.... which is laughable.

[Peikko 1,575]

Caught wth no answer again. At least you managed to croak out more than one word and a punctuation mark.

See what your state's Dem party does with the guy. See if you can find even ONE other Democrat to condemn what this man does. Let's here them weigh in on Anthony Weiner, the virtual raincoater, running for Mayor of New York as a Dem. Its a serious issue then why does a non-Dem need to be the one posting about it?

More deflection. Your ridiculous comments about the victim having to prove why her performance is better wearing panties demonstrates very clearly that you know very little about this issue and care even less. All you care about is making some vacuous point about Democrats.

My personal view is quite clear, he should not be in public office, and although it's not a simple or easy process to push him out of office all efforts should be put into making it happen on top of intense pressure to force him to resign. It is abundantly clear that he has no business at all holding public office, he can't change who he is overnight even with therapy and the fact that he thinks he can just illustrates how delusional he is.

[Gary and Alla 3,694]

Gary, even when the uproar does gets loud enough and they do say "he has to go".....

They welcome his resurrection in the next election cycle.

To be fair, this guy is no CLINTON. Clinton was using State police to corral women (also state workers) to his hotel room for fun and frolic, even if they had to be cajoled into it.

And he is seen as the ROCK STAR of the left, a defender of womens rights.

His wife who stood by him through bimbo after bimbo embarrassment is traveling the world preaching on the rights and elevation of women and will be the feminists choice in 2016.

Trust me neither of my "old fashion" pre feminist Grand mothers would have put up with that stuff privately or publicly for five minutes, yet we are told -Women are stronger now thanks to feminism.... which is laughable.

That's why Clinton is the "Commander in Chief" and these jazbos are just "Feeled marshals"

If I was doing this, my wife would push me away from the microphone, declare me a poisonous reptile and take her stuff and the kids and bug out! Probably declare herself "single" and give out her phone number at the same time. If it were me I would not be a Democrat and would be skewered, tarred and feathered and run out of town by phoney feminists.

More deflection. Your ridiculous comments about the victim having to prove why her performance is better wearing panties demonstrates very clearly that you know very little about this issue and care even less. All you care about is making some vacuous point about Democrats.

My personal view is quite clear, he should not be in public office, and although it's not a simple or easy process to push him out of office all efforts should be put into making it happen on top of intense pressure to force him to resign. It is abundantly clear that he has no business at all holding public office, he can't change who he is overnight even with therapy and the fact that he thinks he can just illustrates how delusional he is.

Thank you

Please comment on Bill Clinton and Anthony Weiner now. No deflecting

Edited August 11, 2013 by Gary and Alla