Jump to content

442 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Posted

but they keep trying.

I love that cartoon. I saved it on my desktop

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Canada
Timeline
Posted

I wonder how many folks would still be anti-gun or "mandatory background checks for all transactions" in the absence of laws.

No one. On the side of anarchy and chaos there is a need for defending one's self from roving gangs of bad folks. In a civilized society there is no room for joe average walking around dealing out justice as he sees fit. Guess which world you and I live in right now.

Posted

It's probably a bad comparison, but here goes. I'll use prohibition as an example The reason for prohibition was the wives of this country thought their husbands were turning into a bunch of lazy no good drunks. Alcohol I'm sure caused alot of violence back then and still does. Then they came along and outlawed alcohol. The alcohol become somewhat more difficult to obtain, but people that wanted it, still got it. I doubt prohibition had any real effect on domestic violence, alcoholism, laziness, whatever. What it did do, was create an illegal market for criminals that I would argue ended up being much worse than the alcohol itself. The point being that outlawing something that people want, doesn't really solve the problems. In fact, it has the unintended consequences of creating new problems. The trick is to get people to not want it. That's the hard part.

Prohibition made alcohol illegal for everyone in the country, even law abiding citizens, I don't think that is a fair comparison. I'm not suggesting outlawing guns for law abiding citizens, but I am advocating tighter controls. It's been proven that a good chunk of the guns used to kill people are sold legally in states with lax gun laws. Tighten those laws and make that much harder to do and the number of gun deaths will start to go down.

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Thailand
Timeline
Posted (edited)

Prohibition made alcohol illegal for everyone in the country, even law abiding citizens, I don't think that is a fair comparison. I'm not suggesting outlawing guns for law abiding citizens, but I am advocating tighter controls. It's been proven that a good chunk of the guns used to kill people are sold legally in states with lax gun laws. Tighten those laws and make that much harder to do and the number of gun deaths will start to go down.

Agreed. Although whenever you make anything more difficult to obtain, by nature the price of that item will increase if there is a demand for it. Whenever you have a wide gap in supply and demand for something that is illegal in one place, but not another, it would make sense to assume there would be people willing to break that law if the price is right. Let's say the government succeeds in passing some kind of national gun restrictions. If there is still a demand that is not being met, then enter the criminal element to meet that demand. At an inflated price of course.

I knew people back in the 80s that got busted buying guns in Virginia and selling them in New York. Let's say Virginia and the rest of the 50 states tighten their gun laws. What's to stop people from manufacturing them in Mexico or any other impoverished country and importing them here? There would definitely be a financial incentive to do so, that probably does not exist today. It just seems that trying cut off the supply of something has never worked until something was done to curb the demand.

Edited by Karee

You can click on the 'X' to the right to ignore this signature.

Posted (edited)

Agreed. Although whenever you make anything more difficult to obtain, by nature the price of that item will increase if there is a demand for it. Whenever you have a wide gap in supply and demand for something that is illegal in one place, but not another, it would make sense to assume there would be people willing to break that law if the price is right. Let's say the government succeeds in passing some kind of national gun restrictions. If there is still a demand that is not being met, then enter the criminal element to meet that demand. At an inflated price of course.

I knew people back in the 80s that got busted buying guns in Virginia and selling them in New York. Let's say Virginia and the rest of the 50 states tighten their gun laws. What's to stop people from manufacturing them in Mexico or any other impoverished country and importing them here? There would definitely be a financial incentive to do so, that probably does not exist today. It just seems that trying cut off the supply of something has never worked until something was done to curb the demand.

I don't believe that. I think cutting off the supply of something to people that aren't legally allowed to have it, has a great affect on the majority of the problem, it keeps most of the honest and somewhat honest folks, from breaking the law. With nationwide gun laws, we are talking about making some gun sales that are now legal, illegal. That alone removes a good amount of the folks that are selling these guns legally from the mix.The hardcore criminal element will always be there to try and circumvent the laws in place, that's why we have law enforcement and prisons.

To say that there is no sense in making new laws because some people are going to break the law anyway is completely ridiculous, imo.

Edited by Teddy B
Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Thailand
Timeline
Posted

I don't believe that. I think cutting off the supply of something to people that aren't legally allowed to have it, has a great affect on the majority of the problem, it keeps most of the honest and somewhat honest folks, from breaking the law. With nationwide gun laws, we are talking about making some gun sales that are now legal, illegal. That alone removes a good amount of the folks that are selling these guns legally from the mix.The hardcore criminal element will always be there to try and circumvent the laws in place, that's why we have law enforcement and prisons.

To say that there is no sense in making new laws because some people are going to break the law anyway is completely ridiculous, imo.

Well the honest and somewhat honest folks aren't the problem. The people that are the problem, are the ones who have no regard for the law in the first place.

You can click on the 'X' to the right to ignore this signature.

Posted

Well the honest and somewhat honest folks aren't the problem. The people that are the problem, are the ones who have no regard for the law in the first place.

Again, I disagree. The honest and somewhat honest folks are the ones selling the guns because it's legal. Making the activity illegal, will deter most of them from selling them.

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Thailand
Timeline
Posted

I think crimes should only be committed with guns bought in the state where the crime is to be committed. Using a gun from another state should be a crime.

Maybe some kind of GPS element to the firing mechanism?

You can click on the 'X' to the right to ignore this signature.

Posted

I think crimes should only be committed with guns bought in the state where the crime is to be committed. Using a gun from another state should be a crime.

It should be transferable though, like a car registration, because criminals have the right to move.

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Brazil
Timeline
Posted

Well the honest and somewhat honest folks aren't the problem. The people that are the problem, are the ones who have no regard for the law in the first place.

perhaps we should ban cities.....

* ~ * Charles * ~ *
 

I carry a gun because a cop is too heavy.

 

USE THE REPORT BUTTON INSTEAD OF MESSAGING A MODERATOR!

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: India
Timeline
Posted

So the idea is to have the wild west and even less laws?

The reasoning for your argument is that since this mythical "criminal" will just get the weapon anyway we as a country should do nothing? Well, except flood the streets with even more weapons?

With that logic:

Since stray dogs may bite humans, flood the cities with even more dogs to attack the stray dogs. Thus protecting more people.

This is nuts...

It's the mythical argument. There isn't any data.

Your logic is passing the more and more laws which really only impacts the law abiding citizens is going to help.

Going with your logic all the citizens should be forced to install the breathe analyzers in the car and everyone would be required to blow to start the car.. just coz some knuckle head made poor choice to drive drunk.

The numbers show IN NY in Chicago even with the stricter gun laws the crime rate is high, which essentially proves just having tougher gun laws does not work but there are other things like felons wanting to purchase a weapon is reported by dealers feds need to work on it rather they let it slide under the rug.

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Canada
Timeline
Posted

Your logic is passing the more and more laws which really only impacts the law abiding citizens is going to help.

Going with your logic all the citizens should be forced to install the breathe analyzers in the car and everyone would be required to blow to start the car.. just coz some knuckle head made poor choice to drive drunk.

The numbers show IN NY in Chicago even with the stricter gun laws the crime rate is high, which essentially proves just having tougher gun laws does not work but there are other things like felons wanting to purchase a weapon is reported by dealers feds need to work on it rather they let it slide under the rug.

All law enforcement exists because some knuckle heads don't follow the laws.

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Philippines
Timeline
Posted

Your logic is passing the more and more laws which really only impacts the law abiding citizens is going to help.

Going with your logic all the citizens should be forced to install the breathe analyzers in the car and everyone would be required to blow to start the car.. just coz some knuckle head made poor choice to drive drunk.

The numbers show IN NY in Chicago even with the stricter gun laws the crime rate is high, which essentially proves just having tougher gun laws does not work but there are other things like felons wanting to purchase a weapon is reported by dealers feds need to work on it rather they let it slide under the rug.

Registering a weapon and getting your background checked only effects those NOT following the law and those who SHOULDN'T have a weapon. Try getting married without getting checked out or try getting a passport.

Why is this so hard to understand? We all follow laws everyday and the ones who don't eventually get caught? Don't want to go to jail...don't break laws.

Is this too difficult to grasp? How's it removing your freedom? If you don't pass...well you didn't have the freedom anyway.

The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. 

-John Kenneth Galbraith

 

Timeline

 5-13-2013 - I129-F Send Express to Texas

 5-15-2013 - I129-F Delivered and signed for in Lewisville Texas at USCIS

 5-17-2013 - NOA1

 5-20-2013 - Check Cashed USCIS

 8-01-2013 - NOA2  (76 Days from NOA1)

 9-20-2013 - NVC received!

10-7-2013  - Received at embassy Manila (17 days from receiving at NVC)

10-21-2013 - Passed Medical

10-25-2013 - Interview scheduled

10-25-2013 - Administrative Review

11-5-2013  -  Approved

11-13-2013 - Visa received

11-19-2013 - Leaving to PI

12-3-2013 - POE Seattle WA

12-14-2013 - Wedding Ruston Washington.

 

 

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...