Guns from out-of-state make up the grand majority of city crimes

[SMOKE 1,426]

I asked an actual question. Why is it that these fanatics are so afraid of the government?

Can you even imagine the logistics involved with confiscating 350 million weapons? With the government full knowing that any teenager could make an IED in 10 minutes with ingredients found in the kitchen.

I mean come on...they have tactical nukes, cruise misses, bunker busters...etc

Your battle you are waging is in your mind and it's over. Enjoy your time on the rock and relax.

no. you've been making insulting comments to everyone that disagrees with you.

i don't see anyone here 'afraid' of the government. i see plenty of people that are opposed to the government tweeking their constitutional rights while doing jack sh!t about the illeagal weapons on the streets.

i'm not in any battle. please tell me. what business is it of yours or anyone else if i have an sti-executive with a few loaded 22 round clips in my nightstand?

[RGinWA 816]

I guess you cannot understand it was for civilians to be in par with govt.

Is today's govt using flint lock and swords?

The 2nd Amendment states that the "weapons shall be on par with the government?"

Where? It states "arms"...nothing else.

So you should be allowed to keep Uranium and Plutonium as well? Tanks, 105's, Mortars and Apache Helicopters also and destroyers and nuclear submarines?

I find that new definition quite fascinating.

Tell me what else the 2nd Amendment says, but doesn't state in actual words? I'm telling you, they should have called it a Psalm, not an Amendment.

no. you've been making insulting comments to everyone that disagrees with you.

i don't see anyone here 'afraid' of the government. i see plenty of people that are opposed to the government tweeking their constitutional rights while doing jack sh!t about the illeagal weapons on the streets.

i'm not in any battle. please tell me. what business is it of yours or anyone else if i have an sti-executive with a few loaded 22 round clips in my nightstand?

When did I ever say to take away that right? Never. I don't remember even thinking that.

[Harsh_77 718]

It's easy to write a rule or law without knowing what the future can hold. What's silly is not even being willing to look at those old laws and attempt to adapt them to the way the world has changed.

You think the founding fathers could have predicted how advanced and efficient guns would eventually become?

Law has nothing to do with how efficient the guns are.

[RGinWA 816]

no. you've been making insulting comments to everyone that disagrees with you.

i don't see anyone here 'afraid' of the government. i see plenty of people that are opposed to the government tweeking their constitutional rights while doing jack sh!t about the illeagal weapons on the streets.

i'm not in any battle. please tell me. what business is it of yours or anyone else if i have an sti-executive with a few loaded 22 round clips in my nightstand?

Didn't you just state people were lying or stupid that didn't agree with you? But I'm insulting?

Ok, I get it now.

[Harsh_77 718]

The 2nd Amendment states that the "weapons shall be on par with the government?"

Where? It states "arms"...nothing else.

It does not even say the civilians should only have flint locks and swords.

[RGinWA 816]

It does not even say the civilians should only have flint locks and swords.

Since all they had at the time were those weapons...I'm positive that's what was agreed to.

PROVE ME WRONG!

LOL

[Penny Lane 8,159]

Anyway you are just beatin around bush.... back to the topic.

Thougher gun laws would not reduce anything, even biden and bloomberg are aware of it yet they just want to make it difficult for legitimate owners to purchase and own a weapon.

Back to the topic? How is the 2nd amendment and its intentions NOT the topic when it comes to a discussion about guns?

Or was that your way of saying you didn't want to answer my question?

[SMOKE 1,426]

When did I ever say to take away that right? Never. I don't remember even thinking that.

do you remember the two reasons for registration post?

[RGinWA 816]

Back to the topic? How is the 2nd amendment and its intentions NOT the topic when it comes to a discussion about guns?

Or was that your way of saying you didn't want to answer my question?

It was a white flag...

[Harsh_77 718]

Since all they had at the time were those weapons...I'm positive that's what was agreed to.

PROVE ME WRONG!

LOL

[SMOKE 1,426]

Didn't you just state people were lying or stupid that didn't agree with you? But I'm insulting?

Ok, I get it now.

if you're not lying...then... wear that shoe & walk your a$$ off

[RGinWA 816]

do you remember the two reasons for registration post?

Those are your reasons, not mine. And of course you're right because the government has a history of disarming the country right?

I'd be far more worried about data mining.

[Harsh_77 718]

Back to the topic? How is the 2nd amendment and its intentions NOT the topic when it comes to a discussion about guns?

Or was that your way of saying you didn't want to answer my question?

300 million guns or how efficient they are, has nothing to do with 2nd Amendment.

I told you even the adovocates of the stricter gun laws know that those are not going to do anything.

[RGinWA 816]

if you're not lying...then... wear that shoe & walk your a$$ off

Again...then I'm insulting? Too funny

I just think this entire love affair with a device that shoots a projectile is a utter brainwashing by the manufacturers and their spokesmen the NRA. I'd be worried if I were you and it's not about them taking your weapons.

Believe me, I've been brain washed...but I volunteered for mine.

[Harsh_77 718]

Again...then I'm insulting? Too funny

I just think this entire love affair with a device that shoots a projectile is a utter brainwashing by the manufacturers and their spokesmen the NRA. I'd be worried if I were you and it's not about them taking your weapons.

Believe me, I've been brain washed...but I volunteered for mine.

R u armed force?