help me plz,,,my fiance s gone

[LNY 0]

i am new here with such a sad and unbelievable storyi have no idea where to start from.our story was a fairy tail ,,,a love story that started online and ended up here in the us.after a long and tiresome k1 procedure we managed to get together and finally my dream come true as the love of my life made it to the usa.however,and when i thought that the happiness is finally on our side ,things took another shape and misunderstandings showed up and our life together became something i have never expected.anyway after all that he run away and went somewhere else . we haven t get married yet and i am so confused now that i don t know what to do .

does he have the right to stay here away from me ??? does he have the right work ??? i m so afraid he ll meet somebody else "that would kill me " in that case does he have the right to marry her??? what about his status here ????

please i m in a desperate need of an advice....thank you

I'm sorry to hear what happens to you. He actually doesn't deserve to have you. Although misunderstanding sometimes shows up in a relationship, he should keep staying with you and trying to solve it together. I think he has no intention to get married with you since the beginning. I know it is very difficult for you to make decision to the one we love. However, if I were you, I would never get married with him even he asked my forgiveness. He has broken your trust once, so you couldn't trust him anymore. He will do the same later and you will get hurt again. You're lucky not to get married with him yet, otherwise your future life will be suffering.

Wish you the best.

[RS232 0]

i am new here with such a sad and unbelievable storyi have no idea where to start from.our story was a fairy tail ,,,a love story that started online and ended up here in the us.after a long and tiresome k1 procedure we managed to get together and finally my dream come true as the love of my life made it to the usa.however,and when i thought that the happiness is finally on our side ,things took another shape and misunderstandings showed up and our life together became something i have never expected.anyway after all that he run away and went somewhere else . we haven t get married yet and i am so confused now that i don t know what to do .

does he have the right to stay here away from me ??? does he have the right work ??? i m so afraid he ll meet somebody else "that would kill me " in that case does he have the right to marry her??? what about his status here ????

please i m in a desperate need of an advice....thank you

I respect your feeling and love. just be carefull because if he underestands that he doesn't have any other way he may tries to deceit you again and get married with you. his action shows that he had never been honest with you and he just wanted to gain his green card.

I hope you find a person for your life who knows the value of love.

Good luck

arash

[Randy 0]

If it would kill you that he met someone else I would suggest that you get therapy. If he cmes back I suggest you both get therapy. Remember if you signed the affadavit of support you are responsible

The I-134 is not all that legally binding. And it only lasts 90 days.

You are no longer responsible after that.

OP, I'm sorry this has happened to you.

Hey Alex...I think you are mistaken on the liability clause of the I-134. Section 3 of the instrucitons clearly state (as was explained to me by my immigration attny) that the liability exists for 3 years. I believe I have read that elsewhere on this website as well. Bottom line if you bring an alien here and have signed an I-134 promise to support, the government can hold you to it for 3 years.

Not true. The I-134 serves as proof of sufficient support such that the person entering the US will not become a public charge. It is not legally binding. Keep in mind that the I-134 is used for cases other than a K-visa....

Jen

Hi Jen... I know this is getting a little "off the topic" of this thread..but..

Here is a quote from the USCIS on the purpose of the I-134.

Form:

I-134, Affidavit of Support

Instructions:

Purpose of Form: To file a promise with USCIS to support an alien entering the United States and that the alien will not become a public charge. A separate affidavit must be filed by the sponsor for each person.

So the purpose is to promise to provide support so they do not become a public charge. The documentation is simply to show proof you can meet this promise (as stated in part II of the form instructions "SUPPORTING EVIDENCE").

Also, item 5 of the I-134 is where you state you are able to "receive, maintain, and support" the person you are sponsoring. And item 6 is where the USC argees "this affidavit will be binding upon me for a period of three(3) years".

If my understanding of these items is wrong...I really would apperciate help from anybody in understanding this.

Thanks!!

Randy

[Boiler 46,399]

Not true. The I-134 serves as proof of sufficient support such that the person entering the US will not become a public charge. It is not legally binding. Keep in mind that the I-134 is used for cases other than a K-visa....

Jen

AND, wouldn't it also hold true that the I-134 proving that the benficiary won't become a public charge is only "in effect" if the marriage occurs within 90 days? Just a thought . . .

It is not conditional, but then it is not enforcable either so a moot point.

[diadromous mermaid 36]

Not true. The I-134 serves as proof of sufficient support such that the person entering the US will not become a public charge. It is not legally binding. Keep in mind that the I-134 is used for cases other than a K-visa....

Jen

AND, wouldn't it also hold true that the I-134 proving that the benficiary won't become a public charge is only "in effect" if the marriage occurs within 90 days? Just a thought . . .

It is not conditional, but then it is not enforcable either so a moot point.

Exactly. The I-134 was later replaced, in many immigrant petitions, with the I-864 for the express purpose that regardless of the intended promissory nature of the I-134, it was not legally binding and was thus unenforceable.