Why the Phrase "Black-on-Black Crime" Suggests Inherent Criminality

[himher 634]

Is that because you spend most of your time in black neighborhoods?

And you concluded this based on what again?

I think you two would make a cute couple.

I wouldn't dream of denying Gary another member of his stable dude

[Dan and Judy 614]

And you concluded this based on what again?

Golly gee, that was a question not a conclusion. Conclusions don't usualy have question marks after them.

You said " My chances of getting killed in a black neighborhood are 8 times greater than my chances of getting killed in a white one"

You can't get killed in a black neighborhood if you're not in a black neighborhood.

Im just trying to figure out how you've increased your odds of getting killed in a black neighborhood.

The best way to do that would be to spend a lot of time in black neighborhoods.

[himher 634]

Golly gee, that was a question not a conclusion. Conclusions don't usualy have question marks after them.

You said " My chances of getting killed in a black neighborhood are 8 times greater than my chances of getting killed in a white one"

You can't get killed in a black neighborhood if you're not in a black neighborhood.

Im just trying to figure out how you've increased your odds of getting killed in a black neighborhood.

The best way to do that would be to spend a lot of time in black neighborhoods.

They're just statistical numbers dude. No further conclusions to draw from that.

[Dan and Judy 614]

They're just statistical numbers dude. No further conclusions to draw from that.

The statistics that you and I came up with would appear at first blush

to be at variance. What we have here is a genuine conundrum.

Wait I think I'm beginging to see the light.

You have been toying with me!

Whites are 5 times more likely to be killed by other whites than by blacks.

Yet "You" are 8 times more likely to be killed in a black neighborhood.

A perplexing mystery indeed.

I have had to re-examine my assumptions

Yes we can now draw the proper conclusion

The statistic you provided is much closer to the odds of a black man being

killed by another black.

Naturally that is most likely to occur in a black neighborhood.

You are quite crafty with your clues.

but I have solved the riddle.

You are in fact black.

Ha! I bet you thought I'd never figure it out.

My compliments, you almost had me sytmied

[Gary and Alla 3,694]

The American Prospect By Jamelle Bouie

“But what’s the big deal?”, you might ask. “Why can’t we use ‘black-on-black crime’ as a shorthand for these particular problems?” The answer isn’t difficult. Violent crime in hyper-segregated neighborhoods doesn’t happenbecause the residents are black. Their race isn’t incidental—the whole reason these neighborhoods exist is racial policymaking by white lawmakers—

Who knew?

And who are those white policy makers? They are the democrats that used to support slavery and segregation by law but support "helping" black people by concentrating them into economically segregated areas with no education and no opportunity, giving them gerrymandered "representatives" who are politically neutered and make them dependent on democrats for more of the same. THAT is racism, and to make it even better...anyone who calls it like it is ....is called a "racist"!

It produces 19 year olds who can't read cursive and cannot speak their native language intelligibly. It produces adults whose best opportunity in life is welfare...they have no possible way of ever hoping to make more money than they can benefit from the welfare system...and that is NOT a coincidence. They have been manuevered into a trap. As long as they depend on welfare, the politicians can control where they live, where they go to school, how they get places and what they eat. They can guarantee future generations of obese, uneducated, hopeless people, ravaged by diabetes and drug addiction. Unable to even WALK away from a flood if it occurs.

Great plan. The KKK could never have done so well.

But we should worry about GZ killing one of the products of this cultivation instead of the plantation that cultivates them?