Jump to content
Gary and Alla

GZ to get his gun back

 Share

841 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: Timeline

This wasnt even a stand your ground case.

I cant believe how sheeple just gobble up whatever is spoon-fed to them by the media. Think, people! Do you really want less rights when it comes to self defense? Do you want it to be a law you cant fight back and have to rely on the government to keep you safe?

Come on!

While not invoking immunity from prosecution under Stand Your Ground, Zimmermann walked away solely due to the statute all the same.

If the Trayvon Martin killing was tried prior to the Stand Your Ground law being passed, the jury would have been told that self-defense was not available to Zimmerman unless he had used every reasonable means to avoid the danger. The jury would have been told that even if they believed Zimmerman had been attacked wrongfully by Trayvon, he could not use deadly force if he could have safely retreated or run away.

Here is the actual jury instruction read to Florida juries prior to the legislature’s enactment of Stand Your Ground.

“The defendant cannot justify the use of force likely to cause death or great bodily harm unless he used every reasonable means within his power and consistent with his own safety to avoid the danger before resorting to that force.

The fact that the defendant was wrongfully attacked cannot justify his use of force likely to cause death or great bodily harm if by retreating he could have avoided the need to use that force. “

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, because it's not about who swung first anymore, it's who is alive to tell the tale.

But if Zimmerman had invoked the SYG law, testified, and was found not guilty, that would have been ok with you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: India
Timeline

Harsh is outsmarting us all once again. This is becoming a daily occurrance here. I might have to find somewhere else to post with dumber people to help give my ego a bit of a boost.

For all the dumbwits AA = African American.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For all the dumbwits AA = African American.

If you say "AA" to most people, they would not automatically think African American. It has nothing to do with being a "dumbwit", but everything to do with which use is more common.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For all the dumbwits AA = African American.

If you say "AA" to most people, they would not automatically think African American. It has nothing to do with being a "dumbwit", but everything to do with which use is more common.

African American isn't even 2nd on my list for "AA". My next guess would had been Afirmative Action.

But I'm just a dummy. rolleyes.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Russia
Timeline

How could Zimmerman have run when poor little innocent Trayvon was on top of him slamming his head into the ground? Duty to flee is hard with someone on top of you.

Still not a SYG case. Simple self defense.

Русский форум член.

Ensure your beneficiary makes and brings with them to the States a copy of the DS-3025 (vaccination form)

If the government is going to force me to exercise my "right" to health care, then they better start requiring people to exercise their Right to Bear Arms. - "Where's my public option rifle?"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Country: Monaco
Timeline

If you say "AA" to most people, they would not automatically think African American. It has nothing to do with being a "dumbwit", but everything to do with which use is more common.

I don't think anyone would associate AA with 'African American' immediately, specially in the context of TM/GZ, being that neither is white nor African.

200px-FSM_Logo.svg.png


www.ffrf.org




Link to comment
Share on other sites

African American isn't even 2nd on my list for "AA". My next guess would had been Afirmative Action.

But I'm just a dummy. rolleyes.gif

My second guess would be American Airlines. :lol:

African American wouldn't even crack the top five.

How could Zimmerman have run when poor little innocent Trayvon was on top of him slamming his head into the ground? Duty to flee is hard with someone on top of you.

Still not a SYG case. Simple self defense.

Psssst, nobody is calling him innocent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So let me get this straight. If Zimmerman had invoked the SYG law and was forced to testify, you think he would have been found guilty, which is the verdict you have been pressing for here for over year. But now you want to remove the SYG law from the books? Seems a bit counterproductive on your part, don't you think?

I have said it before, on paper SYG isn't a bad law. The problem is when it comes to people of color: http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/criminal-justice/is-there-racial-bias-in-stand-your-ground-laws/

Whites who kill blacks in Stand Your Ground states are far more likely to be found justified in their killings. In non-Stand Your Ground states, whites are 250 percent more likely to be found justified in killing a black person than a white person who kills another white person; in Stand Your Ground states, that number jumps to 354 percent.

And I've also said I don't care for the law either way. Self defense is enough for me, I don't need to prove my manhood to anyone else. If SYG wasn't in place, maybe GZ would have stayed in the car and let the cops do their jobs, or he might just have went his merry way. Just like Michael Dunn with Jordan Davis. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/12/04/jordan-davis-shooting-death-repeal_n_2240764.html

My point is that law gives folks the balls to put themselves in situations they wouldn't normally if they thought they could get away with it.

“Hate is too great a burden to bear. It injures the hater more than it injures the hated.” – Coretta Scott King

"Oppressive language does more than represent violence; it is violence; does more than represent the limits of knowledge; it limits knowledge." -Toni Morrison

He who passively accepts evil is as much involved in it as he who helps to perpetrate it.

Martin Luther King, Jr.

President-Obama-jpg.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My second guess would be American Airlines. laughing.gif

African American wouldn't even crack the top five.

Psssst, nobody is calling him innocent.

Well you're just a dumbwit too!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Country: Monaco
Timeline

My second guess would be American Airlines. laughing.gif

African American wouldn't even crack the top five.

Psssst, nobody is calling him innocent.

You're not alone...Even the [sic] dumbwits at the Merriam-Webster dictionary fail to make the connection....

source: http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/aa?show=0&t=1374083470

AAabbreviation
Definition of AA
1administrative assistant
2Alcoholics Anonymous
3antiaircraft
4associate in arts
5author's alterations

200px-FSM_Logo.svg.png


www.ffrf.org




Link to comment
Share on other sites

But if Zimmerman had invoked the SYG law, testified, and was found not guilty, that would have been ok with you?

Yes, but the same goes to you, if he would have testified and been found guilty, would you be ok with it?

“Hate is too great a burden to bear. It injures the hater more than it injures the hated.” – Coretta Scott King

"Oppressive language does more than represent violence; it is violence; does more than represent the limits of knowledge; it limits knowledge." -Toni Morrison

He who passively accepts evil is as much involved in it as he who helps to perpetrate it.

Martin Luther King, Jr.

President-Obama-jpg.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have said it before, on paper SYG isn't a bad law. The problem is when it comes to people of color: http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/criminal-justice/is-there-racial-bias-in-stand-your-ground-laws/

Whites who kill blacks in Stand Your Ground states are far more likely to be found justified in their killings. In non-Stand Your Ground states, whites are 250 percent more likely to be found justified in killing a black person than a white person who kills another white person; in Stand Your Ground states, that number jumps to 354 percent.

And I've also said I don't care for the law either way. Self defense is enough for me, I don't need to prove my manhood to anyone else. If SYG wasn't in place, maybe GZ would have stayed in the car and let the cops do their jobs, or he might just have went his merry way. Just like Michael Dunn with Jordan Davis. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/12/04/jordan-davis-shooting-death-repeal_n_2240764.html

My point is that law gives folks the balls to put themselves in situations they wouldn't normally if they thought they could get away with it.

Marvin, it seems to me that you're trying to have it both ways. I'm just glad in this case, neither one of those ways came to fruition, because there simply wasn't enough evidence to convict GZ of a crime. The judicial system as it stands worked correctly. There are an awful lot of innocent men in prison, I believe putting another one there would have been the worst case scenario.

Yes, but the same goes to you, if he would have testified and been found guilty, would you be ok with it?

Absolutely. I have made numerous posts that I originally did think he might be guilty of manslaughter, but after watching the trial, it simply wasn't there. White, Black, Green or Red, the right verdict was made here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...