Jump to content
spookyturtle

Justice Department To Review George Zimmerman, Trayvon Martin Case

 Share

177 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

2nd degree imo is over the top. I just keep hearing "justice was served" ####### coming from the GZ crowd in an attempt to show their allegiance to the American Justice system. But this allegiance is only as good as the ruling is what they want.

As we discovered after the OJ trial LOL

 

i don't get it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It appears you to do not understand the Federal "hate crimes act" that was passed in 2009.

The final verdict is not yet in.......

Your right, I don't understand the case law of the hate crimes act and you don't either. Just cause you read an freaking article on the subject , Get real. I suppose you are a scholar on the subject OMG The internet has created a cult of idiots that google a subject and then think they are experts.

I don't have any knowledge of particle physics either, but I am sure one of you geniuses

will be along to explain it to me later, after goggling up a link.

Tell us Mr. condescending. Are you a lawyer, Judge, Civil rights attorney. What is your expertise in the field ? I mean other than having a man crush on Chris Mathews.

As for the last part --Your wrong the verdict did come in

I say go ahead and execute GZ to appease the gods of black racism and white guilt , let's just go ahead and get it over with, because it's never going to stop until he is lynched. The evidence proved he was not guilty . He had his day in court, now lets move on

Speaking of using a dead kid for political gain.

All the pundits, all the people here said, let the facts come out and lets have a court case. They all said if we do this, it will be settled. I said a long time ago that it would settle nothing, because most of you don't care if he is guiltily or not.

Well GZ had his day. The facts did not go your way. Accept it and move on.

Edited by The Nature Boy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Country: Monaco
Timeline

Why would GZ not deserve to defend himself if TM was indeed the one to attack him?

I do not dispute his right to defend himself, so much as I question the reason one would find it necessary to shoot an unarmed kid. That is what I find hard to understand.

200px-FSM_Logo.svg.png


www.ffrf.org




Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do not dispute his right to defend himself, so much as I question the reason one would find it necessary to shoot an unarmed kid. That is what I find hard to understand.

He must have been losing the fight.

Bring a gun to a fist fight and you automatically win.

Edited by Penny Lane
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: AOS (pnd) Country: Thailand
Timeline

Your right, I don't understand the case law of the hate crimes act and you don't either. Just cause you read an freaking article on the subject , Get real. I suppose you are a scholar on the subject OMG The internet has created a cult of idiots that google a subject and then think they are experts.

I don't have any knowledge of particle physics either, but I am sure one of you geniuses

will be along to explain it to me later, after goggling up a link.

Tell us Mr. condescending. Are you a lawyer, Judge, Civil rights attorney. What is your expertise in the field ? I mean other than having a man crush on Chris Mathews.

As for the last part --Your wrong the verdict did come in

I say go ahead and execute GZ to appease the gods of black racism and white guilt , let's just go ahead and get it over with, because it's never going to stop until he is lynched. The evidence proved he was not guilty . He had his day in court, now lets move on

Speaking of using a dead kid for political gain.

All the pundits, all the people here said, let the facts come out and lets have a court case. They all said if we do this, it will be settled. I said a long time ago that it would settle nothing, because most of you don't care if he is guiltily or not.

Well GZ had his day. The facts did not go your way. Accept it and move on.

Wow, I guess you could not respond with any credibility and therefore decided to judge me instead.....funny

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow, I guess you could not respond with any credibility and therefore decided to judge me instead.....funny

I think there's a letter for that ... maybe C.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ukraine
Timeline

In my opinion any man who can't punch at all and can't fight back unless they have a weapon must wear something to designate themselves as such. This would alert everyone to the fact that this man is to be feared.

Maybe a 5" round Mr. Softy button?

Concealing who is carrying guns is far more effective at fighting crime.

By allowing any person to carry concealed firearms we create a situation in which every person is to be feared by people with bad intentions. Crime rate plummets.

No buttons needed

Why would you not want low crime?

VERMONT! I Reject Your Reality...and Substitute My Own!

Gary And Alla

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ukraine
Timeline

I would see TM walking down the street.

And I would keep driving.

If he was doing something suspicious enough for me to call the cops on him, I would do so. And not get out of my car.

What would you do?

Get out of the car with a 12 ga. shotgun. Any time I suspect a suspicious situation and have the opportunity I would arm myself with a much more effective weapon than a handgun. I seriously doubt TM would attack someone and try the MMA bullshyt when he sees they are carrying a shotgun.

Everyone goes home alive and the situation gets investigated by police.

VERMONT! I Reject Your Reality...and Substitute My Own!

Gary And Alla

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ukraine
Timeline

Even more pathetic, Florida requires the jury to presume self-defense, once that has been brought forward by the defense, as I posted earlier. Think of it as a license to kill.

You said about 10,000 times that GZ had to prove it was self defense. That the burden of proof was on him. Unlike any other procedure in the entire system of justice...in this case you said the burden of proof was on the defendant. You were wrong, I knew you were wrong, I said he would be acquitted and you contunued ad nauseum with your completely distorted interpretation

You have no idea what you are talking about so.....keep talking

VERMONT! I Reject Your Reality...and Substitute My Own!

Gary And Alla

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ukraine
Timeline

You are incorrect again. Not guilty does not mean innocent. If he were innocent he would not be on trial to begin with. How can anyone kill an unarmed 17-yo kid and be innocent? GZ would have been innocent had he called the police and allowed them time to investigate the situation.

We can bandy over words and that would be stupid. So I will leave that to you. He is not guilty.

There was no intent to put him on trial because people knowledgeable of such things knew the result would be a not guilty verdict, so why bother.

Certain political influences were applied to force the issue to trial. This never had any possibility of changing the known outcome.

You and Patriot, and others of similar information level, were supposed to be appeased by the trial and happily go away knowing that the US justice system had been applied and GZ was actually entitled to kill someone under these specific set of circumstances.

It was a waste of time and money.

VERMONT! I Reject Your Reality...and Substitute My Own!

Gary And Alla

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ukraine
Timeline

So if six people in a Jury found him guilty of 2nd degree murder, you'd have accepted that and not blamed it on them being racial sympathizers? Why do i have a hard time believing that?

Yes.

You have a hard time with that because you clearly have a hard time believing facts.

GZ is not guilty. Believe it.

VERMONT! I Reject Your Reality...and Substitute My Own!

Gary And Alla

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ukraine
Timeline

2nd degree imo is over the top. I just keep hearing "justice was served" ####### coming from the GZ crowd in an attempt to show their allegiance to the American Justice system. But this allegiance is only as good as the ruling is what they want.

I would have accepted any verdict as that of our justice system.

Justice was served when GZ killed TM. Everyone knew that going in except people that needed it to be proven to them...and they still don't believe it

It is not the "GZ crowd" that needs to show their allegience to the American Justice system.

VERMONT! I Reject Your Reality...and Substitute My Own!

Gary And Alla

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ukraine
Timeline

You know if a black man had two cuts and a bloody nose from killing a white teen those two cuts would be nothing and the sidewalk as a weapon would be laughed at.

Any person who gets in a fight on sidewalk is as good as dead if one is packing.

America...land of the scared and the home of the wimp.

If GZ was black, there would not have been a trial. There would not have been a trial at all if it had not been for outside pressure to begin with.

I thought you had a concealed carry license.

VERMONT! I Reject Your Reality...and Substitute My Own!

Gary And Alla

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...