How to get away with murder (non-state actor edition)

[Teddy B 17,252]

How do you know he was a burglar?

C'mon, that's obvious. He's black, out after dark and wearing a hoodie.

[Penny Lane 8,159]

TM was a burglar? Huh?

[JohnR! 5,495]

How do you know he was a burglar?

Most likely by the color of his skin. Many people believe that all blacks are criminals, as does GZ.

Edited July 15, 2013 by Gegel

[Teddy B 17,252]

TM was a burglar? Huh?

How do you think he got that cell phone and the bag of skittles?

[The Nature Boy 4,224]

How do you know he was a burglar?

No that is unfair. All we know is that he was caught with about 20 pieces of stolen jewelry in his knapsack and he had a burglary tool in it. Along with drug residue. This was after he was observed committing vandalism

He was not convicted or charged , so in all fairness we do not know for a fact he was a burglar.

Lot of good info on why the jewelry was reported found on Campus instead of TM being turned over to the police. Dade country campus police had been ordered to lower the stats of black males being arrested on campus. So two separate reports were written. One for the vandalism and one for the stolen Jewelry "found on campus".

[I AM NOT THAT GUY 5,715]

How do we know he was black?

[JohnR! 5,495]

He was not convicted or charged , so in all fairness we do not know for a fact he was a burglar.

Ergo, he did nothing wrong.... right?

How do we know he was black?

How do we even know he was?

[GandD 5,966]

No that is unfair. All we know is that he was caught with about 20 pieces of stolen jewelry in his knapsack and he had a burglary tool in it. Along with drug residue. This was after he was observed committing vandalism

He was not convicted or charged , so in all fairness we do not know for a fact he was a burglar.

Lot of good info on why the jewelry was reported found on Campus instead of TM being turned over to the police. Dade country campus police had been ordered to lower the stats of black males being arrested on campus. So two separate reports were written. One for the vandalism and one for the stolen Jewelry "found on campus".

Was this on a separate occasion that I don't know about?

[The Nature Boy 4,224]

Most likely by the color of his skin. Many people believe that all blacks are criminals, as does GZ.

That is just racist psycho babble. No one believes that. Lot of good decent black people in this world some of whom I love dearly.

What many do believe is that black society is rotting from within, and that demographic of young black males 15-25 is in huge trouble, and it's not because of white generational racism.

Ergo, he did nothing wrong.... right?

How do we even know he was?

Well GZ was found not guilty so he did nothing wrong right ?

[We Keep Receipts 9,238]

I've been at the rally. So excuse my absence.

[Penny Lane 8,159]

If he wasn't convicted, then it doesn't matter. That's what I hear about GZ, so the same should apply.

TM wasn't a burglar and GZ never resisted arrested with violence.

Edited July 15, 2013 by Penny Lane

[The Nature Boy 4,224]

Was this on a separate occasion that I don't know about?

Here is a link if you wish to read about it. It's all documented well.

http://theconservativetreehouse.com/2013/05/01/m-dspd-cover-up-the-curious-case-of-trayvon-martins-backpack-with-stolen-jewelry-and-burglary-tool/

[dalegg 143]

People who are saying there is no justice in this case cannot possibly be basing it on the trial. I think they are basing their feelings on maybe their dislike for the law? It would be literally impossible to think this trial could have ended up in anything but not guilty if you really watched it. Impossible.

So, getting back then to what would be justice, at this point I have a question based on a hypothetical. Lets assume for a minute that what has been mostly shown in this case were true, plus the added assumption that George Zimmerman actually physically jumped Treyvan Martin in the first place as I think it being proposed. Then as things progressed Treyvan being the better fighter got the upper hand on his attacker and began bashing his head into the sidewalk--now please for a moment just assume for arguments sake this did happen. But in this alternate scenario GZ has no gun, and TM continues to bash his head into the concrete until GZ is dead.

Question for you-- since in this scenario GZ was the attacker, do you believe TM would have been justified in your mind by taking the assault to the point of death?

[I AM NOT THAT GUY 5,715]

Here is a link if you wish to read about it. It's all documented well.

http://theconservativetreehouse.com/2013/05/01/m-dspd-cover-up-the-curious-case-of-trayvon-martins-backpack-with-stolen-jewelry-and-burglary-tool/

Racist gun nutter "conservative" website? Yea, that is a reputable source.

[Ban Hammer 13,337]

What is really cool is that now, that everything we have been telling them for months has happened and been proven, despite their deprived maniac ramblings, the worst among them has gone MIA and the next 2 or 3 libtards have grown quite. What a blessing

It's amazing how well we can all get along and exchange ideas without them

the end result - gary was right!