Jump to content
spookyturtle

Who do you think is VJ's biggest GZ supporter?

 Share

125 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Canada
Timeline

Great. I'm not talking about the stupid media, though.

What people watch and read is directly related to what they think. I don't think people start out as extremists. I think tendencies get fed to the point of, in some cases, exploding into violent acts. Muslim terrorists, cult members, Christian zealots, etc. People in general aren't this dumb....... I hope. Over years of inflammatory talk by mentors, social groups, talking heads, whatever, people start to believe in this hate driven #######. How is it people think the US government is on the verge of becoming Nazi Germany? Its so alarming to me that people can think this way when I haven't been fueled from the same source as them for the past however many years. Going through immigration makes me believe the government has become less capable of doing..... well anything than ever before.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Country: Philippines
Timeline

You explained at great length your bias and how you judged someone guilty before the trial started and ignored any questions or points that I brought up that you didn't want to answer because they didn't fit into your viewpoint. There was no reasoning with you, MBD and a few others. Hopefully the jury went into this case without a preconceived verdict and will base their decision on the law and the evidence presented. Just like they did with OJ and Casey Anthony.

Hahaha... You're a riot. You have stated repeatedly, that TM was pounding on GZ, which is speculative. You were not above the foray of opinions here, and it's not forming an opinion to the guilt or innocence of either GZ or TM, that is bad, but how those various opinions were formed. I was convinced that killing TM was not justified based on the evidence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Philippines
Timeline

What people watch and read is directly related to what they think. I don't think people start out as extremists. I think tendencies get fed to the point of, in some cases, exploding into violent acts. Muslim terrorists, cult members, Christian zealots, etc. People in general aren't this dumb....... I hope. Over years of inflammatory talk by mentors, social groups, talking heads, whatever, people start to believe in this hate driven #######. How is it people think the US government is on the verge of becoming Nazi Germany? Its so alarming to me that people can think this way when I haven't been fueled from the same source as them for the past however many years. Going through immigration makes me believe the government has become less capable of doing..... well anything than ever before.

I disagree somewhat.

People are lazy and that makes them ill informed. If you use ANY form of broadcast media to get your news you're being somewhat misled. I go back and forth through the channels and I see the biased reporting, its always sensationalized to attract viewers (Maybe not PBS, but commercial TV in general.).

I use the formula that it's probably 60% accurate, but I need to verify what is the truth with other sources. i.e. do some homework.

I use to think feeding the starving people of Africa was a no brainer. Send them some rice, what's bad about that? I believed that until African activist explained how the aid was actually counter productive to a sustainable solution. (They actually thought Bono was misguided in his efforts.) They stated that the aid was stolen by warlords and the African's were not learning to grow their own crops.

People will believe anything they hear in most cases. As stated, I've been sucked into that myself.

The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. 

-John Kenneth Galbraith

 

Timeline

 5-13-2013 - I129-F Send Express to Texas

 5-15-2013 - I129-F Delivered and signed for in Lewisville Texas at USCIS

 5-17-2013 - NOA1

 5-20-2013 - Check Cashed USCIS

 8-01-2013 - NOA2  (76 Days from NOA1)

 9-20-2013 - NVC received!

10-7-2013  - Received at embassy Manila (17 days from receiving at NVC)

10-21-2013 - Passed Medical

10-25-2013 - Interview scheduled

10-25-2013 - Administrative Review

11-5-2013  -  Approved

11-13-2013 - Visa received

11-19-2013 - Leaving to PI

12-3-2013 - POE Seattle WA

12-14-2013 - Wedding Ruston Washington.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Put us all in a room, close the door, and tell us we have to have a verdict so we can go home.

Watch how quickly opinions can sometimes coalesce.

Nowhere in the history of the planet have 6 women ever agreed on anything. Next.

 

i don't get it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hahaha... You're a riot. You have stated repeatedly, that TM was pounding on GZ, which is speculative. You were not above the foray of opinions here, and it's not forming an opinion to the guilt or innocence of either GZ or TM, that is bad, but how those various opinions were formed. I was convinced that killing TM was not justified based on the evidence.

I'm telling Amby. See if I watch buzzards naked with you again.

R.I.P Spooky 2004-2015

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hahaha... You're a riot. You have stated repeatedly, that TM was pounding on GZ, which is speculative. You were not above the foray of opinions here, and it's not forming an opinion to the guilt or innocence of either GZ or TM, that is bad, but how those various opinions were formed. I was convinced that killing TM was not justified based on the evidence.

Nobody actually knew that TM was on top of GZ pounding on him until it was described by an eyewitness. Was that eyewitness speculating? I watched him testify and he just described what he saw. So if it is in fact not speculative and it did happen as was described by an eyewitness - in your opinion did GZ have the right to defend himself or not? Do you accept eyewitness testimony or not? The riot is watching you and your fellows dismiss that eyewitness testimony in favor of articles in New York newspapers.

Edited by himher

 

i don't get it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nobody actually knew that TM was on top of GZ pounding on him until it was described by an eyewitness. Was that eyewitness speculating? I watched him testify and he just described what he saw. So if it is in fact not speculative and it did happen as was described by an eyewitness - in your opinion did GZ have the right to defend himself or not? Do you accept eyewitness testimony or not? The riot is watching you and your fellows dismiss that eyewitness testimony in favor of articles in New York newspapers.

Crickets...........................

 

i don't get it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Philippines
Timeline

Nobody actually knew that TM was on top of GZ pounding on him until it was described by an eyewitness. Was that eyewitness speculating? I watched him testify and he just described what he saw. So if it is in fact not speculative and it did happen as was described by an eyewitness - in your opinion did GZ have the right to defend himself or not? Do you accept eyewitness testimony or not? The riot is watching you and your fellows dismiss that eyewitness testimony in favor of articles in New York newspapers.

Yes, towards the end of the altercation one witness saw 10 seconds of the entire event, yet nobody knows WHO started it.

Yet we know who decided to put himself in harms way and follow a teenager down a dark path knowing he couldn't even throw a punch after 18 months of training? I tell you what, as the NW captain, GZ was going to eventually shoot someone because he's irresponsible in knowing his own soft limitations. Anyone that incapable of defending himself should NEVER leave his car. He should just "observe and report".

The case was investigated in a very shotty manner. The walk-through shows a bias to believe the shooter because they didn't ask dozens of questions. Especially the question about the 2 missing minutes that GZ never explained.

The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. 

-John Kenneth Galbraith

 

Timeline

 5-13-2013 - I129-F Send Express to Texas

 5-15-2013 - I129-F Delivered and signed for in Lewisville Texas at USCIS

 5-17-2013 - NOA1

 5-20-2013 - Check Cashed USCIS

 8-01-2013 - NOA2  (76 Days from NOA1)

 9-20-2013 - NVC received!

10-7-2013  - Received at embassy Manila (17 days from receiving at NVC)

10-21-2013 - Passed Medical

10-25-2013 - Interview scheduled

10-25-2013 - Administrative Review

11-5-2013  -  Approved

11-13-2013 - Visa received

11-19-2013 - Leaving to PI

12-3-2013 - POE Seattle WA

12-14-2013 - Wedding Ruston Washington.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, towards the end of the altercation one witness saw 10 seconds of the entire event, yet nobody knows WHO started it.

Yet we know who decided to put himself in harms way and follow a teenager down a dark path knowing he couldn't even throw a punch after 18 months of training? I tell you what, as the NW captain, GZ was going to eventually shoot someone because he's irresponsible in knowing his own soft limitations. Anyone that incapable of defending himself should NEVER leave his car. He should just "observe and report".

The case was investigated in a very shotty manner. The walk-through shows a bias to believe the shooter because they didn't ask dozens of questions. Especially the question about the 2 missing minutes that GZ never explained.

So it is clear that the "pounding on" comment is not speculation but is based on eyewitness testimony. Glad we got past that little factual bump.

Florida law allows legal use of deadly force EVEN IF GZ started it AND THEN TM accelerated to the point that GZ believed he was in danger of serious harm.

You did know that right?

Edited by himher

 

i don't get it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Philippines
Timeline

So it is clear that the "pounding on" comment is not speculation but is based on eyewitness testimony. Glad we got past that little factual bump.

Florida law allows legal use of deadly force EVEN IF GZ started it AND THEN TM accelerated to the point that GZ believed he was in danger of serious harm.

You did know that right?

BUT, you can't go into an altercation with a firearm and use it just because you feel you're losing the fight if the other person does not have a firearm. It was a part of the jury's instructions and part of the Florida state law.

You need to consider that in GZ own account his head was not on the cement any longer, his hands were free and no matter how many punches TM threw they were not doing any damage to GZ's face? Where are the facial blows? Just the nose he claims happened at the very first. If you're on top the whole time wailing on a person there would be severe damage to the front of his face. And GZ claims he was being suffocated...WHILE YELLING for help and that's why he had to shoot? Really?

TM knows he has a gun and now "cannot" overpower little soft Georgie? I mean come on...that would be a struggle with both hands to get the gun. GZ said "He said you gonna die tonight MF'er" yet TM just ignored the gun once in the hand and allowed himself to be shot and said "you got me"? GZ didn't know TM was hit, but stopped screaming and holstered his weapon? Against a guy that was killing him and wasn't shot yet? It's totally fabricated.

His entire account is pure BS and self serving.

This is one reason GZ tried to claim "he forgot" he had the weapon on him...although he stated he carries the weapon everyday. Because of the law regarding self defense and equal force.

He's a soft little liar.

The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. 

-John Kenneth Galbraith

 

Timeline

 5-13-2013 - I129-F Send Express to Texas

 5-15-2013 - I129-F Delivered and signed for in Lewisville Texas at USCIS

 5-17-2013 - NOA1

 5-20-2013 - Check Cashed USCIS

 8-01-2013 - NOA2  (76 Days from NOA1)

 9-20-2013 - NVC received!

10-7-2013  - Received at embassy Manila (17 days from receiving at NVC)

10-21-2013 - Passed Medical

10-25-2013 - Interview scheduled

10-25-2013 - Administrative Review

11-5-2013  -  Approved

11-13-2013 - Visa received

11-19-2013 - Leaving to PI

12-3-2013 - POE Seattle WA

12-14-2013 - Wedding Ruston Washington.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BUT, you can't go into an altercation with a firearm and use it just because you feel you're losing the fight if the other person does not have a firearm. It was a part of the jury's instructions and part of the Florida state law.

You need to consider that in GZ own account his head was not on the cement any longer, his hands were free and no matter how many punches TM threw they were not doing any damage to GZ's face? Where are the facial blows? Just the nose he claims happened at the very first. If you're on top the whole time wailing on a person there would be severe damage to the front of his face. And GZ claims he was being suffocated...WHILE YELLING for help and that's why he had to shoot? Really?

TM knows he has a gun and now "cannot" overpower little soft Georgie? I mean come on...that would be a struggle with both hands to get the gun. GZ said "He said you gonna die tonight MF'er" yet TM just ignored the gun once in the hand and allowed himself to be shot and said "you got me"? GZ didn't know TM was hit, but stopped screaming and holstered his weapon? Against a guy that was killing him and wasn't shot yet? It's totally fabricated.

His entire account is pure BS and self serving.

This is one reason GZ tried to claim "he forgot" he had the weapon on him...although he stated he carries the weapon everyday. Because of the law regarding self defense and equal force.

He's a soft little liar.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/153373601/Zimmerman-Final-Jury-Instructions

It was a part of the jury's instructions and part of the Florida state law.

Here they are exactly as presented to the jury. Show us all.

.

Edited by himher

 

i don't get it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Other Country: Pakistan
Timeline

hi ewverybody ...anybody there who can guide me about i 130 my wife applied at 30 aril we got noa 1 but still waiting for noa 2 ...its been 2 n half months n still waiting ..let me know how long we have to wait for noa 2 ?

heart.gif Love is Life heart.gif



heart.gif




Link to comment
Share on other sites

hi ewverybody ...anybody there who can guide me about i 130 my wife applied at 30 aril we got noa 1 but still waiting for noa 2 ...its been 2 n half months n still waiting ..let me know how long we have to wait for noa 2 ?

You are in the wrong forum..

Try here. Several People from your country or that have experience with your embassy that I am sure can help you. Good luck

http://www.visajourney.com/forums/forum/91-asia-south/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Timeline

hi ewverybody ...anybody there who can guide me about i 130 my wife applied at 30 aril we got noa 1 but still waiting for noa 2 ...its been 2 n half months n still waiting ..let me know how long we have to wait for noa 2 ?

https://egov.uscis.gov/cris/Dashboard/CaseStatus.do

About four more months.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...