excellent read - New Yorker, "...Stand Whose Ground?"

[Penny Lane 8,159]

In very few post you have questioned TMs action, most post you are only questioning GZs action which would make anyone believe that you are implying GZ is guilty.

Instead of trying to figure out what I'm implying, read what I'm actually saying. There are no hidden messages you need to decode.

I believe they both were in the wrong.

[Jacque67 7,328]

Instead of trying to figure out what I'm implying, read what I'm actually saying. There are no hidden messages you need to decode.

I believe they both were in the wrong.

Harsh has links with india so is impartial.

[Harsh_77 718]

You appear to be associated with India. Does that mean your comments are biased?

Biased to wht?

Instead of trying to figure out what I'm implying, read what I'm actually saying. There are no hidden messages you need to decode.

I believe they both were in the wrong.

Maybe you dont think they were but your post seemed to be attacking GZ.

Harsh has links with india so is impartial.

you got it.

[OnMyWayID 1,489]

So many more other interesting topics and yet this lather-rinse-repeat again.

[The Nature Boy 4,224]

Instead of trying to figure out what I'm implying, read what I'm actually saying. There are no hidden messages you need to decode.

I believe they both were in the wrong.

Do you realize how many times per day to how many diffrent people you try to explain how you never implied what you implied

[Penny Lane 8,159]

Maybe you dont think they were but your post seemed to be attacking GZ.

Saying I think he did something wrong isn't an attack.

Again, you keep looking for hidden meaning. Or responding to what I "seem" to think.

Respond to the actual words I am typing.

GZ should not have followed TM. TM should not have attacked because of being followed.

[Penny Lane 8,159]

Do you realize how many times per day to how many diffrent people you try to explain how you never implied what you implied

Because you and others seem to react to what someone isn't saying, rather than what they are. Very annoying. And let's be honest, it really isn't many different people I have to say this to. 99% of the time, it's you or Harsh.

I can say one thing, but you believe I secretly mean another... so you'll ignore what I say and react to what you believe I mean.

Take a look at just an hour ago. I agreed with Karee that TM shouldn't have attacked GZ for being followed. But then I dared to say GZ also shouldn't have followed him in the first place.

And what do you respond to?

You post a rant about how he had the right to follow him and how people just want GZ to be guilty no matter what.

I said they're both wrong, but to some, that's somehow an attack on GZ.

So many more other interesting topics and yet this lather-rinse-repeat again.

Feel free to post some of those many other more interesting topics!

Edited July 10, 2013 by Penny Lane

[OnMyWayID 1,489]

Feel free to post some of those many other more interesting topics!

I put up one last night on Mexico passing the US as being the fattest country on earth but no traction (I spelled Mexico Mexic maybe that threw people off).

I have a feel good video of an animal group in Chile typing helium balloons to abandoned dogs with messages like "pet me" and "hug me" and then they followed the dogs with cameras and watched how the treatment of them improved immensely as people hugged them to death and gave them food.. I was thinking of posting it just to see f people could turn it into a left/right thing.

Edited July 10, 2013 by OnMyWayID

[Penny Lane 8,159]

I put up one last night on Mexico passing the US as being the fattest country on earth but no traction (I spelled Mexico Mexic maybe that threw people off).

I have a feel good video of an animal group in Chile typing helium balloons to abandoned dongs with messages like "pet me" and "hug me" and then they followed the dogs with cameras and watched how the treatment of them improved immensely as people hugged them to death and gave them food.. I was thinking of posting it just to see f people could turn it into a left/right thing.

That is adorable.

[Darnell 8,479]

So many more other interesting topics and yet this lather-rinse-repeat again.

you missed the part where oil is applied.

That's ok - some fellas prefer to fap dry.

[Teddy B 17,252]

Because you and others seem to react to what someone isn't saying, rather than what they are. Very annoying. And let's be honest, it really isn't many different people I have to say this to. 99% of the time, it's you or Harsh.

I can say one thing, but you believe I secretly mean another... so you'll ignore what I say and react to what you believe I mean.

Take a look at just an hour ago. I agreed with Karee that TM shouldn't have attacked GZ for being followed. But then I dared to say GZ also shouldn't have followed him in the first place.

And what do you respond to?

You post a rant about how he had the right to follow him and how people just want GZ to be guilty no matter what.

I said they're both wrong, but to some, that's somehow an attack on GZ.

Feel free to post some of those many other more interesting topics!

It's just like the gun control argument. You and I have both stated numerous times that we believe in one's right to bear arms and we don't want to take that away, we just want stricter controls. But that gets interpreted to we are lowlife liberals in favor of the gov't taking all the guns away and we hate Murica.

[OnMyWayID 1,489]

Edited July 10, 2013 by OnMyWayID

[Penny Lane 8,159]

I want to take home all the animals.

(This is why I shouldn't volunteer at the humane society)

Edited July 10, 2013 by Penny Lane

[Harsh_77 718]

It's just like the gun control argument. You and I have both stated numerous times that we believe in one's right to bear arms and we don't want to take that away, we just want stricter controls. But that gets interpreted to we are lowlife liberals in favor of the gov't taking all the guns away and we hate Murica.

You were never able to say what is stricter gun control, nor were you ever able to give a reason why law abiding citizens should have to follow more stricter regulation.

[Penny Lane 8,159]

Law abiding citizens have to follow strict regulations for plenty of things. I don't see why guns should be the exception.