Jump to content
Gary and Alla

GZ/TM Case Turning Into a Kangaroo Court Prosecution

 Share

352 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

It is actually logical for the screaming to stop after the shot whether the screamer or the screamee pulled the trigger. So there is not much to be deduced from the fact that screaming stopped.

exactly . either way. If it was TM screaming then he is shot, no more screaming

If it was GZ he is no longer being beat. he stopped screaming

They are grasping at straws

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does anyone know if GZ is supposed to testify?

I heard one of the "legal experts" on the news the other night say that with the way the trial is going, heavily in GZ's favor, there is no need for him to testify.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I heard one of the "legal experts" on the news the other night say that with the way the trial is going, heavily in GZ's favor, there is no need for him to testify.

I know that sometimes the defendant doesn't testify, depending what the strategy and evidence is. I didn't recall hearing anything either way for this trial.

R.I.P Spooky 2004-2015

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Timeline

i guess you missed the obvious, martin wasn't raining punches down on him at this point.

The "ground and pound" punches that failed to leave a mark? Zimmermann had one insignificant injury to his face that is consistent with a single blow. He had zero defensive injuries.

Which leaves the obvious question: Where did all these supposed MMA style "ground and pound" punches land?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Marvin, what's your take on the trial so far? Do you still believe GZ is guilty of murder?

I've been trying to avoid watching too much since I was on vacation and the missus keeps me from bringing it up. My take is this:

I don't think that GZ set out to murder TM on a whim. But I will say his choices and actions were not correct in handling the situation. Also, his story has changed quite a few times. First he was following him, then he wasn't, then he was looking for road signs in a community that only has 3.

oh ok. you're muslim?

Yes, converted 2 years ago.

I heard one of the "legal experts" on the news the other night say that with the way the trial is going, heavily in GZ's favor, there is no need for him to testify.

It wouldn't be wise, because if the prosecution gets a hold of him they can poke holes in his story.

“Hate is too great a burden to bear. It injures the hater more than it injures the hated.” – Coretta Scott King

"Oppressive language does more than represent violence; it is violence; does more than represent the limits of knowledge; it limits knowledge." -Toni Morrison

He who passively accepts evil is as much involved in it as he who helps to perpetrate it.

Martin Luther King, Jr.

President-Obama-jpg.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Timeline

The "ground and pound" punches that failed to leave a mark? Zimmermann had one insignificant injury to his face that is consistent with a single blow. He had zero defensive injuries.

Which leaves the obvious question: Where did all these supposed MMA style "ground and pound" punches land?

idk ask the prosecutions witness that testified on the assault he witnessed.

Yes, converted 2 years ago.

cool thanks.
7yqZWFL.jpg
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been trying to avoid watching too much since I was on vacation and the missus keeps me from bringing it up. My take is this:

I don't think that GZ set out to murder TM on a whim. But I will say his choices and actions were not correct in handling the situation. Also, his story has changed quite a few times. First he was following him, then he wasn't, then he was looking for road signs in a community that only has 3.

Yes, converted 2 years ago.

It wouldn't be wise, because if the prosecution gets a hold of him they can poke holes in his story.

I agree that GZ's choices were not wise, I've said that all along. I also thought that those poor choices would get him a manslaughter conviction, because it appeared that GZ was the aggressor. But based on what I've seen and heard so far, TM also made some very poor choices, and was just as much the aggressor, if not more so as GZ. I don't see the manslaughter conviction happening now either. The prosecutions case is even weaker than I originally thought.

I agree that it would be a huge mistake at this point for GZ to take the stand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree that GZ's choices were not wise, I've said that all along. I also thought that those poor choices would get him a manslaughter conviction, because it appeared that GZ was the aggressor. But based on what I've seen and heard so far, TM also made some very poor choices, and was just as much the aggressor, if not more so as GZ. I don't see the manslaughter conviction happening now either. The prosecutions case is even weaker than I originally thought.

I agree that it would be a huge mistake at this point for GZ to take the stand.

That would depend on if TM circled back and attacked him, or if GZ caught up to him. If TM circled back, it was a bad choice. He could have kept going and made it home. But no one knows for sure. Because GZ's actions caused TM to become hostile, it's not too far fetched that TM said to heck with it and decided to stand his ground.

We also don't know what was said or done when the two met, GZ said he didn't do anything to initiate the fight and TM just whaled on him. But earlier he was running after him. How far did he get before he decided to go look at road signs? How could TM sneak up behind him if he was fully aware that this kid was out there? Why didn't GZ run back to his car and get in? There are some things that don't add up.

“Hate is too great a burden to bear. It injures the hater more than it injures the hated.” – Coretta Scott King

"Oppressive language does more than represent violence; it is violence; does more than represent the limits of knowledge; it limits knowledge." -Toni Morrison

He who passively accepts evil is as much involved in it as he who helps to perpetrate it.

Martin Luther King, Jr.

President-Obama-jpg.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Timeline

I know that sometimes the defendant doesn't testify, depending what the strategy and evidence is. I didn't recall hearing anything either way for this trial.

The defense would be crazy to put Zimmermann on the stand. Prosecution would have a field day with him.

idk ask the prosecutions witness that testified on the assault he witnessed.

He didn't know either. It's odd though, so many MMA style blows and nothing to show for it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The defense would be crazy to put Zimmermann on the stand. Prosecution would have a field day with him.

I wonder about that with this prosecutor, it seems he knew this was a lost cause from the beginning and appears to be just going through the motions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If he doens't take the stand, that to me solidifies his guilt. Mr. Dooley had a stronger case of self defense than this, and he took the stand because he felt justified in shooting Mr. James.

“Hate is too great a burden to bear. It injures the hater more than it injures the hated.” – Coretta Scott King

"Oppressive language does more than represent violence; it is violence; does more than represent the limits of knowledge; it limits knowledge." -Toni Morrison

He who passively accepts evil is as much involved in it as he who helps to perpetrate it.

Martin Luther King, Jr.

President-Obama-jpg.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...