Not Qualified For Obamacare Subsidies? Just Lie.

[Gary and Alla 3,694]

http://www.forbes.com/sites/theapothecary/2013/07/06/not-qualified-for-obamacares-subsidies-just-lie-govt-to-use-honor-system-without-verifying-your-eligibility/?partner=yahootix

Another safe thread for Obama comment...no Obama supporters will come near.

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

Avik Roy needs to understand that the guy on whose team he worked lost the 2012 Presidential election. In a landslide. He came up short. Which is no wonder seeing he surrounded himself with tools like Avik Roy.

[Gary and Alla 3,694]

Avik Roy needs to understand that the guy on whose team he worked lost the 2012 Presidential election. In a landslide. He came up short. Which is no wonder seeing he surrounded himself with tools like Avik Roy.

So what do think about Obama suspending Obamacare for Walmart and other big business donors until after the 2014 elections?

Do you believe Walmart should be exempt just because they were eliminating full time jobs and replacing them with part time jobs to avoid the costs of Obamacare?

Do you believe the correct response to this is to suspend the requirement that Walmart participate and put the burden on small business, individuals and the self employed?

Do you think the President should be able to arbitrarily suspend a LAW for certain people while enforicing it for others without going through congress?

Do you think, perhaps, congress should change something about Obamacare or that it is just perfect as is...with the waiver for Walmart, of course, and the waiver of verification for people getting subsidies?

Now that you have commented on the author, do you have any comment on the policy or the program?

Do you have something to add besides personal attacks on writers? And FYI Vermont has its own single payer medical care plan and will not participate in accordance with the law since my state has something better. So you need not worry about me being the one to "cheat". I would like to hear your thoughtful comments on this important legislation.

[Jacque67 7,328]

Good grief!

[The Nature Boy 4,224]

Avik Roy needs to understand that the guy on whose team he worked lost the 2012 Presidential election. In a landslide. He came up short. Which is no wonder seeing he surrounded himself with tools like Avik Roy.

B. it was not on MSNBC, Al-Jazerra, Salon,CNN or other left wing approved sources so it is obvious right wing biased hate,no matter how many facts they quote

[The Nature Boy 4,224]

So what do think about Obama suspending Obamacare for Walmart and other big business donors until after the 2014 elections?

Do you believe Walmart should be exempt just because they were eliminating full time jobs and replacing them with part time jobs to avoid the costs of Obamacare?

Do you believe the correct response to this is to suspend the requirement that Walmart participate and put the burden on small business, individuals and the self employed?

Do you think the President should be able to arbitrarily suspend a LAW for certain people while enforicing it for others without going through congress?

Do you think, perhaps, congress should change something about Obamacare or that it is just perfect as is...with the waiver for Walmart, of course, and the waiver of verification for people getting subsidies?

Now that you have commented on the author, do you have any comment on the policy or the program?

Do you have something to add besides personal attacks on writers? And FYI Vermont has its own single payer medical care plan and will not participate in accordance with the law since my state has something better. So you need not worry about me being the one to "cheat". I would like to hear your thoughtful comments on this important legislation.

Obama giving special perks to Walmart. You do know that is the perfect liberal quandary. They will not be able to handle this truth. I see a letter response coming.

That does not compute

[lostinblue 1,989]

Or just proclaim the author is a racist...works for every libatard on this board.

[Gary and Alla 3,694]

Politically there is no quandry.

Obamacare is a disaster and that is becoming clear even to morons that did not understand it when it was passed without reading it "We need to pass it so we know what's in it" (Nancy Pelosi)

It is going to cause the loss of the Senate in the 2014 elections if it is not changed. But Obama does not want to "change it" because that would mean the Republicans were right and he would still lose the Senate in 2014. Changes in the law in accordance with the constitution would mean the Repub run House would get a say in the changes...and he can't have that either. So he arbitrarily postpones parts of the law until after the election...the parts that affect big political donors to Senate campaigns.

Most of his followers are moronic robots who will understand his explanation of bailing out Walmsrt as being something he needed to do because of his superior abilty to understand the Karma of the World. I mean they accept him going along with Bush and Cheney on wiretapping...why not this?

Obama giving special perks to Walmart. You do know that is the perfect liberal quandary. They will not be able to handle this truth. I see a letter response coming.

That does not compute

Or just proclaim the author is a racist...works for every libatard on this board.

But they avoid threads where it is clear that Obama is nothing but another George Bush when he needs to be for his own benefit.

[The Nature Boy 4,224]

Politically there is no quandry.

Obamacare is a disaster and that is becoming clear even to morons that did not understand it when it was passed without reading it "We need to pass it so we know what's in it" (Nancy Pelosi)

It is going to cause the loss of the Senate in the 2014 elections if it is not changed. But Obama does not want to "change it" because that would mean the Republicans were right and he would still lose the Senate in 2014. Changes in the law in accordance with the constitution would mean the Repub run House would get a say in the changes...and he can't have that either. So he arbitrarily postpones parts of the law until after the election...the parts that affect big political donors to Senate campaigns.

Most of his followers are moronic robots who will understand his explanation of bailing out Walmsrt as being something he needed to do because of his superior abilty to understand the Karma of the World. I mean they accept him going along with Bush and Cheney on wiretapping...why not this?

But they avoid threads where it is clear that Obama is nothing but another George Bush when he needs to be for his own benefit.

Politically there is no quandary for you because you make decisions on logic and does it violate the rights of the individual, regardless of how you personally feel about the action.

If you think like a **

Obama absolute good , not capable of bad

Walmart absolute bad , can do no good

Obama supports Walmart=== ** Logic loop. They can not compute it.

Politically there is no quandry.

Obamacare is a disaster and that is becoming clear even to morons that did not understand it when it was passed without reading it "We need to pass it so we know what's in it" (Nancy Pelosi)

It is going to cause the loss of the Senate in the 2014 elections if it is not changed. But Obama does not want to "change it" because that would mean the Republicans were right and he would still lose the Senate in 2014. Changes in the law in accordance with the constitution would mean the Repub run House would get a say in the changes...and he can't have that either. So he arbitrarily postpones parts of the law until after the election...the parts that affect big political donors to Senate campaigns.

Most of his followers are moronic robots who will understand his explanation of bailing out Walmsrt as being something he needed to do because of his superior abilty to understand the Karma of the World. I mean they accept him going along with Bush and Cheney on wiretapping...why not this?

But they avoid threads where it is clear that Obama is nothing but another George Bush when he needs to be for his own benefit.

They are not avoiding your threads. They usually only post during the week when they are at work LOL

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

Do you have something to add besides personal attacks on writers?

Pointing out that this tool has worked for the Romney campaign is a personal attack? Awesome.

[Gary and Alla 3,694]

Pointing out that this tool has worked for the Romney campaign is a personal attack? Awesome.

No response to the topic.

Awesome.

It is what I hoped for

[Gary and Alla 3,694]

Politically there is no quandary for you because you make decisions on logic and does it violate the rights of the individual, regardless of how you personally feel about the action.

If you think like a **

Obama absolute good , not capable of bad

Walmart absolute bad , can do no good

Obama supports Walmart=== ** Logic loop. They can not compute it.

They are not avoiding your threads. They usually only post during the week when they are at work LOL

Right, I do not care if an issue affects me, if I like it, do it, want it, or want my children to do it. I support freedom and rights for ALL. It means I necessarily support rights for Gays, even though I am not gay and have no interest in that.

It also means I can disagree with you on an issue and say so...and agree with you on another issue and say so. It seems a lot of people cannot agree with someone on ANYTHING because they disagree with them on SOMETHING. THAT is stupid. I see no conflict at all with having my own opinions which means I will always have differences with someone over something. Because they are my OWN opinions and are consistent with my OWN beliefs, not Bush's, not Reagan's (the last Republican I voted for BTW) and not Obama's

I probably agree with Penny and Mr. Big Dog or many more issues than we disagree on, yet they have to attack me and my family constantly to the point of being ridiculous and completely irrelevent because they disagree with me on gun issues and just about nothing else. They even agree on welfare...unless I get some of it ...because they disagree with me on guns. And the infantile fascination with my whreabouts and daily itinerary is borderline creepy. I am not worried. My mother has given me permission to stay up late because I don't have work tomorrow.

Danno, what happened to Danno?...I could agree with him on a lot of things and disagree on others. I would support his arguments when he was right (agrees with me) and jump all over his position when he was wrong (disagrees with me) I never had to insult him personally. I don't even know the guy.

I communicate with Kip a lot. He and I can fight over some issues like cats and dogs, but dammit I was jealous when he told me he was going fishing for salmon yesterday! I would sure as heck like to argue the virtues of 18 year old blind, deaf gymnasts from Belarus vs. 45yr old HOT cougars from Ukraine over a fight with a Chinook! You know his position on gays and mine don't match, but who cares?

People paint themselves in corners when they have to accept anything Obama says, even when it agrees with people they say they hated! George Bush was terrible, until Obama agrees with him and now they are quoting Republicans in supporting trashing our 4th amendment rights!

They look stupid! Trashing our rights is WRONG! Its always wrong! If Bush does it I will say so, if Obama does it I will say so.

But hey, when they want to look foolish, I let them.

And I really don't care what they do at work, as long as they contribute by payroll deduction

And once again... I AM NOT REPUBLICAN.

[Darnell 8,478]

Gary, the Acorn employees had to find something new to tell their peeps,

even though they no longer work for Acorn.

It's ok, all is allright - relax a bit, it's just the regular 'thing' going down...

[The Nature Boy 4,224]

Pointing out that this tool has worked for the Romney campaign is a personal attack? Awesome.

C. I have no idea idea how to respond to the overwhelming facts you presented, so I will just call you a nut job **/rwnj with zero reading comprehension insult you and move on, and claim I already answered the question. ( this covers the tin foil hat stupidity)

[The Nature Boy 4,224]

Right, I do not care if an issue affects me, if I like it, do it, want it, or want my children to do it. I support freedom and rights for ALL. It means I necessarily support rights for Gays, even though I am not gay and have no interest in that.

It also means I can disagree with you on an issue and say so...and agree with you on another issue and say so. It seems a lot of people cannot agree with someone on ANYTHING because they disagree with them on SOMETHING. THAT is stupid. I see no conflict at all with having my own opinions which means I will always have differences with someone over something. Because they are my OWN opinions and are consistent with my OWN beliefs, not Bush's, not Reagan's (the last Republican I voted for BTW) and not Obama's

I probably agree with Penny and Mr. Big Dog or many more issues than we disagree on, yet they have to attack me and my family constantly to the point of being ridiculous and completely irrelevent because they disagree with me on gun issues and just about nothing else. They even agree on welfare...unless I get some of it ...because they disagree with me on guns. And the infantile fascination with my whreabouts and daily itinerary is borderline creepy. I am not worried. My mother has given me permission to stay up late because I don't have work tomorrow.

Danno, what happened to Danno?...I could agree with him on a lot of things and disagree on others. I would support his arguments when he was right (agrees with me) and jump all over his position when he was wrong (disagrees with me) I never had to insult him personally. I don't even know the guy.

I communicate with Kip a lot. He and I can fight over some issues like cats and dogs, but dammit I was jealous when he told me he was going fishing for salmon yesterday! I would sure as heck like to argue the virtues of 18 year old blind, deaf gymnasts from Belarus vs. 45yr old HOT cougars from Ukraine over a fight with a Chinook! You know his position on gays and mine don't match, but who cares?

People paint themselves in corners when they have to accept anything Obama says, even when it agrees with people they say they hated! George Bush was terrible, until Obama agrees with him and now they are quoting Republicans in supporting trashing our 4th amendment rights!

They look stupid! Trashing our rights is WRONG! Its always wrong! If Bush does it I will say so, if Obama does it I will say so.

But hey, when they want to look foolish, I let them.

And I really don't care what they do at work, as long as they contribute by payroll deduction

And once again... I AM NOT REPUBLICAN.

You could have just said I am not a ** and been done. We would have understood.

You are right they are obsessed with you as I have pointed out many times. My theory is that you so eloquently destroy the myths and stupidty the believe the only possible way to discredit you is to insult you

So many times there answers are carbon copy knee jerk reactions, that have nothing to do with the facts.

That is why I invented the letter response system. Rarely do they give a valid counter point to anything. It saves typing