Jump to content
SAT

The SteveAndTiff Identity

 Share

3,535 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Malaysia
Timeline

So here are pictures... Taken by my Blackberry, so not the best quality wink.png

BBQ in preparations...

2lkbhhk.jpg

And our kiełbasa being grilled wink.png

2rcsj06.jpg

Ah I'm all cleaned up and hungry.....

Now how many kielbasas did you eat? Don't lie!

But you didn't show us the other stuff that you had. I wanna see the loaf of bread!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline

Oh, I had two of his post reported, since they had absolutely nothing in common with the OP questions...

An the mod told me that I should stop reporting ALL his posts, cause he is experienced and his posts are helping other people.

I'm happy to see that I'm not the only one driven to distraction by that one, si and no man.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline

It's great to see something in Polish, even if the sentence is a mess laughing.gif

Blame www.freetranslation.com, even though it did a fairly literate job of translating the Polish back into the intended English.

What is the correct Polish terminology for "si, man"? And you still haven't told us the precise term for "wedgie," no man.

Edited by TBoneTX

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline

6- #######, you didn't see the post where Wacko told us she has the cooties.....

All girls have cooties, see man. Didn't you learn anything in 4th grade?

no hablo espanol

Asia will verify that my eminently literate Polish phrase said "English-only in the upper forums, si man." However, because this post of yours was the last one on the page, I didn't read it and this is therefore a phantasmal reply, man.

Edited by TBoneTX

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline

I really won't drug my future children, I promise.

Well, hmmmph, man -- you're off my list.

Edited by TBoneTX

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline

Unexpected surprise in the mail today. My damage deposit from my apartment back home.

I hope that your deposit wasn't too damaged, no man.

----------------------------

A man telephoned a pet shop and said, "I'd like to place an order for 25,000 cockroaches."

"What in the world do you want with that many roaches?" asked the clerk.

"Well, I'm moving tomorrow," explained the man, "and my lease says that I must leave the premises in exactly the same condition in which I found them."

---------------------------

The landlady was showing a prospective tenant a dingy room with badly spotted wallpaper. "This is a very nice room," she declared. The last man who lived here was an inventor -- he invented some kind of explosive."

"I see," said the prospective tenant. "And I suppose that the spots on the wall are the explosive?"

"No," corrected the landlady, "they're the inventor."

Edited by TBoneTX

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline

Went garage-saling today. What a waste of time. At a house in one of the richest 'hoods in town, the sellers were trying to sell stained, torn, frayed bath towels for $5 each. Some of them, I wouldn't have even considered as shop-rags, no man.

I did buy about a dozen women's items (hold on, now!) very cheaply. I first took them to a snooty resale place that doesn't buy much but pays well when they do. They took a couple of the items. I then went to our consignment shop, which took most of the rest. The remainder, I took to the resale shop where we donate our stuff. This was time-consuming (Mrs. T-B. was not pleased, no man), but it resulted in a little immediate and (it's hoped) deferred defrayal of expense, si man. Free enterprise in action, whee man.

Came home, had a truncated nap (Mrs. T-B. was not pleased, no man), and mowed lawn. Lawnmower fell apart almost right away, but got repaired with (literally) baling-wire and duct tape, whee man. Because of slightly un-hotter weather, the mowing job almost didn't kill me this time, no man. In addition, for the first time in recorded recent memory, I was bitten neither by mosquitoes nor by hormigas del fuego, no man. I saw (and mowed over) several hormiga-hills, but nobody bit nobody, no man. Said hills were nuked with sprinklings of Amdro, si man.

Washed filthy T-mobile today, which will ensure rain by Monday at latest.

One of my favorite VJ posts said something to the effect of "if it says notarize do it then, don't if aint." The elegance of the last three words is wondrous to behold, mirabile visu man.

Bedtime, zzz man.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Timeline

Asia that's awesome! Those are exactly the pics I wanna see. Poland is now on my bucket list......

I wanna BBQ kielbasa now......

I'm glad you liked it! :)

Ah I'm all cleaned up and hungry.....

Now how many kielbasas did you eat? Don't lie!

But you didn't show us the other stuff that you had. I wanna see the loaf of bread!

Hm... I eat one kiełbasa... My mom eat the second one, and my dad eat the last two ones :D

And sorry for not taking any picture of bread, ketchup, mustard, beetroot with horseradish and some beers and Coke, which were all the other stuff we had :rofl:

Lovely photos, asia! Strawberries look nommy. smile.png

Those were wild strawberries, to be exact.

Much smaller than the strawberries and much more sweeter! :)

Dunno if you have them over there...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: China
Timeline

I'm happy to see that I'm not the only one driven to distraction by that one, si and no man.

Something is broken. I suggest intervention.

Sometimes my language usage seems confusing - please feel free to 'read it twice', just in case !
Ya know, you can find the answer to your question with the advanced search tool, when using a PC? Ditch the handphone, come back later on a PC, and try again.

-=-=-=-=-=R E A D ! ! !=-=-=-=-=-

Whoa Nelly ! Want NVC Info? see http://www.visajourney.com/wiki/index.php/NVC_Process

Congratulations on your approval ! We All Applaud your accomplishment with Most Wonderful Kissies !

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Timeline

Blame www.freetranslation.com, even though it did a fairly literate job of translating the Polish back into the intended English.

What is the correct Polish terminology for "si, man"? And you still haven't told us the precise term for "wedgie," no man.

Yeah all the on-line translators translate each separate word, not caring about the meaning of the whole sentence. Which is funny, but still kinda understandable ;)

If "si" means "yes" (which is how I read it), in Polish it will be "tak, kolo". Tho it sounds more better as "si,man" :D

I haven't told you the precise term for "wedgie", since I still haven't found it...

OK, so I googled it (since google has answer to all questions lol), and I finally got the answer: "wedgie" in Polish is "zmajtkować" :lol: It's a verb tho, so it has to be conjugated.

So...

I'm zmajtkowany

You're zmajtkowany

He's zmajtkowany

She's zmajtkowana

It's zmajtkowane

We're zmajtkowani

You're zmajtkowani

They're zmajtkowani

I hope it covers the whole subject :rofl:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Timeline

I'm happy to see that I'm not the only one driven to distraction by that one, si and no man.

I wondered about putting him to ignore, but decided against it, instead treating his posts as an entertainment, kinda ignoring them and reading other posters' answer to them only... :lol:

I hope it covers the whole subject rofl.gif

And I hope that despite my loooooooong post being the last one on the page it would be read, cause I put a lot of thoughts/writing into it! :lol:

Asia will verify that my eminently literate Polish phrase said "English-only in the upper forums, si man."

I will definitely verify that! :)

The "man" from your phrase was translated as "człowiek", which is right since "man" is "człowiek" in Polsih.

Tho I still think "kolo" will be better, even if "kolo" rather means "buddy' in English.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: China
Timeline

i am uncertain if there is just one word in Polish resembling 'wedgie' in english.

noun - the visual after the verb is applied.

example - You gave me a wedgie !

verb - to grasp the backside of another person's underbritches, grasping firmly, and pull UP until the underbritches have transformed into a glob of cloth, firmly 'wedged' into the crack of one's #######.

example - Keep running your mouth, and I will wedgie you.

There are also varying degrees of wedgies, based on how high up the underbritches were pulled, or how much material makes it into the crack of one's #######.

For a married couple to do this, as an entertaining hobby - I don't get it. I find our time better spent in a 2 or 3 hour session of tantric massage, instead. When I say I don't get it, I truly mean that - I am very aware of wedgies and how to give one - usually it's done as a psychologically-damaging event, male to male, to establish superiority. Age range 11 to 17. Usually stops after first instance with coitus with a female. Usually.

Sometimes my language usage seems confusing - please feel free to 'read it twice', just in case !
Ya know, you can find the answer to your question with the advanced search tool, when using a PC? Ditch the handphone, come back later on a PC, and try again.

-=-=-=-=-=R E A D ! ! !=-=-=-=-=-

Whoa Nelly ! Want NVC Info? see http://www.visajourney.com/wiki/index.php/NVC_Process

Congratulations on your approval ! We All Applaud your accomplishment with Most Wonderful Kissies !

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Timeline

If "si" means "yes" (which is how I read it), in Polish it will be "tak, kolo". Tho it sounds more better as "si,man" biggrin.png

Or...

Which came to me at this very moment...

Considering the whole sentences finished with "si, man" or "no, man"... It might be translated a little different...

"Si man" could mean "oj tak".

"No man" could mean "oj nie".

Just to emphasize what's been said in the sentence (that's how I read it ;))

Or..

not :lol:

The thing is I don't translate English to Polish. When I read in English (books, stories, forums), I switch myself to English, think in English, write in English... If I started to translate the reading text into Polish, it would take much more time to absorb and my brain would be a mess :rofl:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...