Day 5- Zimmerman Trial

[spookyturtle 9,465]

Off topic reported

Snitch.

[The Nature Boy 4,224]

Snitch.

Not really just making a point

[The Nature Boy 4,224]

How come they don't match? I think you just flagrantly violated the TOS, again.

Maybe that is the key. Flagrant violation instead of the run of the mill violation we all do everyday

[The Nature Boy 4,224]

How come they don't match? I think you just flagrantly violated the TOS, again.

Maybe that is the key. Flagrant violation instead of the run of the mill violation we all do everyday

[I AM NOT THAT GUY 5,715]

Maybe that is the key. Flagrant violation instead of the run of the mill violation we all do everyday

Maybe that is the key. Flagrant violation instead of the run of the mill violation we all do everyday

Who all is "we" white boy?

[himher 634]

How come they don't match? I think you just flagrantly violated the TOS, again.

uh they don't match because the first post was his post and the second post was my post. It even had my name up there in the corner and stuff

Edited June 30, 2013 by himher

[The Nature Boy 4,224]

Who all is "we" white boy?

we would be the collective regular members of this forum, all of whom violate the TOS at some point or another almost daily even if slightly.

Technically I have some injuin in me so I am not all white.

[I AM NOT THAT GUY 5,715]

uh they don't match because the first post was his post and the second post was my post. It even had my name up there in the corner and stuff

However, you failed to delineate what you added to his post. When you quote someone, you are saying you quoted him verbatim. However, the way you posted it, you are saying he said something he did not say.

[I AM NOT THAT GUY 5,715]

Maybe that is the key. Flagrant violation instead of the run of the mill violation we all do everyday

Are you including at least one mod in your collective?

[The Nature Boy 4,224]

Are you including at least one mod in your collective?

No No It is a violation of TOS to talk about a MOD.

[himher 634]

However, you failed to delineate what you added to his post. When you quote someone, you are saying you quoted him verbatim. However, the way you posted it, you are saying he said something he did not say.

Every single one of the original words are all still there dude.

[I AM NOT THAT GUY 5,715]

No No It is a violation of TOS to talk about a MOD.

Which mod are you talking about?

Every single one of the original words are all still there dude.

Along with ones that were not posted by him, yet the casual reader would have no way of easily noting which are which.

[I AM NOT THAT GUY 5,715]

There, fixed.

I give up.

[himher 634]

Which mod are you talking about?

Along with ones that were not posted by him, yet the casual reader would have no way of easily noting which are which.

The strikethroughs, the specific purpose of which are to preserve the original post, are offered as clues to the casual reader. Is this another of your 911 things?

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

I give up.

What, his words are all still there...