The George Zimmerman Trial Verdict Game

[Darnell 8,478]

OH so now he's not guilty due to the racial makeup of the jury? LOL

There would be no guilty verdict if they just picked 6 random people off the street

Not guilty and walks right out of the courtroom to participate in the news conference

I say the ethnic lass there, being half-black and half-hispanic,

will be a good thing for George,

as George is 1/2 afro-peruvian mix (from his mom's side)

[Jawaree 717]

Don't think George sees himself anything but Jewish

not especially afro-Peruvian

[Shiobhan 235]

guilty

[himher 634]

guilty

You probably need to get your riot plans ready. Not guilty.

[The Nature Boy 4,224]

You probably need to get your riot plans ready. Not guilty.

My riot plan

[Jawaree 717]

Y go there? who mentioned a riot...for what?

Its a regular occurence. lots of lives value

more than others in many peoples mind...no one

can change that

[RGinWA 816]

Guilty of Criminal Negligence 2 years and a 10 year gun enhancement (Under Florida law.)

He's not guilty of 2nd degree and Manslaughter would be probably a little over what has been presented, but the sentencing time could be about the same depending on the mandatory min in Florida, not sure of that.

He had no ill intent on killing, just fixated on finding and possibly apprehending a "suspect".

I decide to stop posting on this because it was only inflaming the comments made towards TM.

Martin's sentence was already handed down. In my opinion there is no need to trample his name further and exert more damage.

[The Nature Boy 4,224]

Guilty of Criminal Negligence 2 years and a 10 year gun enhancement (Under Florida law.)

He's not guilty of 2nd degree and Manslaughter would be probably a little over what has been presented, but the sentencing time could be about the same depending on the mandatory min in Florida, not sure of that.

He had no ill intent on killing, just fixated on finding and possibly apprehending a "suspect".

I decide to stop posting on this because it was only inflaming the comments made towards TM.

Martin's sentence was already handed down. In my opinion there is no need to trample his name further and exert more damage.

If that option is available, then I agree the jury may arrive at that sentence.

I think the Jury gives him a slap on the wrist .

Edited July 10, 2013 by The Nature Boy

[RGinWA 816]

If that option is available, then I agree the jury may arrive at that sentence.

I think the Jury gives him a slap on the wrist .

I think allowing him to walk when he called police already, was told not to follow, yet walked looking for a "suspect" in a dark area after he knew the suspect saw him at least 3 times is "not responsible and is negligent" no matter who it is or how "legal" it may technically be. Think about it, even police call for backup.

GZ never defuses the situation by speaking and identifying himself. (His words) In his flustered state he reaches for his phone? That act alone could be considered a threatening move? But the details of who hit who pretty much don't matter at this point.

GZ's probably a nice guy, but even nice guys do dumb stuff and people die.

That's why I say he's negligent in creating a situation, legal or not that chain of stupid events, by the adult NW leader caused the "event" to have the potential to occur.

Example: What if a skinny frail guy strolls into a biker bar and proceeds to verbally assault all the patrons? It's legal, freedom of speech right? He even taunts the bikers as he's leaving.

In the parking lot they confront him, he now is in fear of his life so he reaches for his phone, he gets punched. The wimpy guy kills them all with his CW. He's not guilty of anything? Stupidity is now a reward?

In the old days you got in a fight and you learned; maybe don't do that? Now you get in a fight, you kill and learn nothing. Because real criminals, who you are defending from, will just start shooting first if anything...because they are criminals, they adapt.

GZ life is ruined no matter what the verdict is and it didn't have to be and TM didn't have to be dead. So in this case, everybody lost. Like I said, maybe don't do that then.

The verdict will decide really nothing, only further inflame "sides". It's really sad to see people that convinced of who their fellow man really is...just based on a few news reports. And that goes for both sides.

Like I said, it's not meant to inflame the issue and I don't have a side as much as I have a position on being more humane to each other and less human.

Just my two cents.

[Jawaree 717]

I think allowing him to walk when he called police already, was told not to follow, yet walked looking for a "suspect" in a dark area after he knew the suspect saw him at least 3 times is "not responsible and is negligent" no matter who it is or how "legal" it may technically be. Think about it, even police call for backup.

GZ never defuses the situation by speaking and identifying himself. (His words) In his flustered state he reaches for his phone? That act alone could be considered a threatening move? But the details of who hit who pretty much don't matter at this point.

GZ's probably a nice guy, but even nice guys do dumb stuff and people die.

That's why I say he's negligent in creating a situation, legal or not that chain of stupid events, by the adult NW leader caused the "event" to have the potential to occur.

Example: What if a skinny frail guy strolls into a biker bar and proceeds to verbally assault all the patrons? It's legal, freedom of speech right? He even taunts the bikers as he's leaving.

In the parking lot they confront him, he now is in fear of his life so he reaches for his phone, he gets punched. The wimpy guy kills them all with his CW. He's not guilty of anything? Stupidity is now a reward? DITTO

In the old days you got in a fight and you learned; maybe don't do that? Now you get in a fight, you kill and learn nothing. Because real criminals, who you are defending from, will just start shooting first if anything...because they are criminals, they adapt.

GZ life is ruined no matter what the verdict is and it didn't have to be and TM didn't have to be dead. So in this case, everybody lost. Like I said, maybe don't do that then.

The verdict will decide really nothing, only further inflame "sides". It's really sad to see people that convinced of who their fellow man really is...just based on a few news reports. And that goes for both sides.

Like I said, it's not meant to inflame the issue and I don't have a side as much as I have a position on being more humane to each other and less human.

Just my two cents.

[Shiobhan 235]

The judge can say whatever,lets hope all those in his corner kids, nephews, G/kids

be safe in their world 4ever. His father was a judge so whats expected, Florida even

let go Caylee Anthonys mom after she killed her, a Social worker lied that she was

visiting a foster kid for a year. All that time the child was dead---murdered----whats with

that state ? Really

[himher 634]

Guilty of Criminal Negligence 2 years and a 10 year gun enhancement (Under Florida law.)

He's not guilty of 2nd degree and Manslaughter would be probably a little over what has been presented, but the sentencing time could be about the same depending on the mandatory min in Florida, not sure of that.

He had no ill intent on killing, just fixated on finding and possibly apprehending a "suspect".

I decide to stop posting on this because it was only inflaming the comments made towards TM.

Martin's sentence was already handed down. In my opinion there is no need to trample his name further and exert more damage.

Hey I know I know! You libs can SURELY find a dam parking violation to stick him with because it's quite evident he parked in the street to get out of his car to exercise his right to perform neighborhood watch services to his neighborhood. Add that to "Felony Murder 3rd degree 'child abuse'"

Here's some laws for you, dogdoo, and the mullet to search through to look for a violation

Florida Statutes 316.1945 - Stopping, standing, or parking prohibited in specified places Florida Statutes > Chapter 316 > 316.1945

^{Current as of: 2012}

^{Check for updates}

2011 version

(1) Except when necessary to avoid conflict with other traffic, or in compliance with law or the directions of a police officer or official traffic control device, no person shall:

(a) Stop, stand, or park a vehicle:

1. On the roadway side of any vehicle stopped or parked at the edge or curb of a street.

2. On a sidewalk.

3. Within an intersection.

4. On a crosswalk.

5. Between a safety zone and the adjacent curb or within 30 feet of points on the curb immediately opposite the ends of a safety zone, unless the Department of Transportation indicates a different length by signs or markings.

6. Alongside or opposite any street excavation or obstruction when stopping, standing, or parking would obstruct traffic.

7. Upon any bridge or other elevated structure upon a highway or within a highway tunnel.

8. On any railroad tracks.

9. On a bicycle path.

10. At any place where official traffic control devices prohibit stopping.

11. On the roadway or shoulder of a limited access facility, except as provided by regulation of the Department of Transportation, or on the paved portion of a connecting ramp; except that a vehicle which is disabled or in a condition improper to be driven as a result of mechanical failure or crash may be parked on such shoulder for a period not to exceed 6 hours. This provision is not applicable to a person stopping a vehicle to render aid to an injured person or assistance to a disabled vehicle in obedience to the directions of a law enforcement officer or to a person stopping a vehicle in compliance with applicable traffic laws.

12. For the purpose of loading or unloading a passenger on the paved roadway or shoulder of a limited access facility or on the paved portion of any connecting ramp. This provision is not applicable to a person stopping a vehicle to render aid to an injured person or assistance to a disabled vehicle.

(b) Stand or park a vehicle, whether occupied or not, except momentarily to pick up or discharge a passenger or passengers:

1. In front of a public or private driveway.

2. Within 15 feet of a fire hydrant.

3. Within 20 feet of a crosswalk at an intersection.

4. Within 30 feet upon the approach to any flashing signal, stop sign, or traffic control signal located at the side of a roadway.

5. Within 20 feet of the driveway entrance to any fire station and on the side of a street opposite the entrance to any fire station within 75 feet of such entrance (when property signposted).

6. On an exclusive bicycle lane.

7. At any place where official traffic control devices prohibit standing.

© Park a vehicle, whether occupied or not, except temporarily for the purpose of, and while actually engaged in, loading or unloading merchandise or passengers:

1. Within 50 feet of the nearest rail of a railroad crossing unless the Department of Transportation establishes a different distance due to unusual circumstances.

2. At any place where official signs prohibit parking.

(2) No person shall move a vehicle not lawfully under his or her control into any such prohibited area or away from a curb such a distance as is unlawful.

(3) A law enforcement officer or parking enforcement specialist who discovers a vehicle parked in violation of this section or a municipal or county ordinance may:

(a) Issue a ticket form as may be used by a political subdivision or municipality to the driver; or

(b) If the vehicle is unattended, attach such ticket to the vehicle in a conspicuous place, except that the uniform traffic citation prepared by the department pursuant to s. 316.650 may not be issued by being attached to an unattended vehicle.

The uniform traffic citation prepared by the department pursuant to s. 316.650 may not be issued for violation of a municipal or county parking ordinance.

(4) A violation of this section is a noncriminal traffic infraction, punishable as a nonmoving violation as provided in chapter 318.

Edited July 12, 2013 by himher

[RGinWA 816]

Hey I know I know! You libs can SURELY find a dam parking violation to stick him with because it's quite evident he parked in the street to get out of his car to exercise his right to perform neighborhood watch services to his neighborhood. Add that to "Felony Murder 3rd degree 'child abuse'"

Here's some laws for you, dogdoo, and the mullet to search through to look for a violation

Proving my point on why commenting on this subject with some is just pointless. Human lives mean little depending on the position held right?

In the end, GZ will not be dead and he too will have paid what he owed; regardless of the verdict.

What's happening to GZ is legal...you understand that right? And if you do not get that, it's no biggee...flame on, it's your angst, let it all out.

[himher 634]

Proving my point on why commenting on this subject with some is just pointless. Human lives mean little depending on the position held right?

In the end, GZ will not be dead and he too will have paid what he owed; regardless of the verdict.

What's happening to GZ is legal...you understand that right? And if you do not get that, it's no biggee...flame on, it's your angst, let it all out.

I know and what happened in the other (17) cases of self-defense that were later overturned was also legal. What is happening with Trevor Dooley (the "skateboard killer") who spend all of 2 months in jail after he was convicted and is now out on bond during his appeal is also legal. No matter what happens in this case, and I will pay out my bet like a man, this one will be overturned in record time because the prosecution proved NOTHING and ended up "shopping charges" on the last day so that they could fit something, anything, to convict this defendant.

[RGinWA 816]

I know and what happened in the other (17) cases of self-defense that were later overturned was also legal. What is happening with Trevor Dooley (the "skateboard killer") who spend all of 2 months in jail after he was convicted and is now out on bond during his appeal is also legal. No matter what happens in this case, and I will pay out my bet like a man, this one will be overturned in record time because the prosecution proved NOTHING and ended up "shopping charges" on the last day so that they could fit something, anything, to convict this defendant.

If the prosecution proves nothing then GZ walks. If he's convicted it means something was proved?

"Shopping charges" as you call it is how the legal system works. The supreme court has already ruled on lesser charge sentencing.

Again, on both issues you are again incorrect.

A guilty verdict PROVES the case that was presented was VALID. No matter how much you stomp your feet, that's the way it works.

I thought p!ssing and moaning started after a loss? I guess you just like beginning early?

As you were soldier...