Obama's Civil-Liberties Record Questioned

[Gary and Alla 3,694]

The collection of telephone records, started by George Bush and continued by Obama, in addition to his attempts to strip Americans of their 2nd amendment rights and 1st amendment rights with oppressive tax policies against political enemies, has finally awoken the compliant media.

Criticized as unconstitutional, the collection of phone records was supposed to halt when Obama was elected to fix the problems George Bush caused. Obama now says Bush was right, in announcing that collecting the phone records of Americans is an important tool in fighting terrorism. People who support our civil rights point out that collecting phone records IS terrorism! Obama could have halted the intrusion in American's 4th amendment rights the day he took office. He has expanded it in his campaign against the rights of Americans

Obama's Soviet style tactics to suppress political enemies continue.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324069104578529671066598106.html?ru=yahoo?mod=yahoo_itp

[lostinblue 1,989]

[The Nature Boy 4,224]

The collection of telephone records, started by George Bush and continued by Obama, in addition to his attempts to strip Americans of their 2nd amendment rights and 1st amendment rights with oppressive tax policies against political enemies, has finally awoken the compliant media.

Criticized as unconstitutional, the collection of phone records was supposed to halt when Obama was elected to fix the problems George Bush caused. Obama now says Bush was right, in announcing that collecting the phone records of Americans is an important tool in fighting terrorism. People who support our civil rights point out that collecting phone records IS terrorism! Obama could have halted the intrusion in American's 4th amendment rights the day he took office. He has expanded it in his campaign against the rights of Americans

Obama's Soviet style tactics to suppress political enemies continue.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324069104578529671066598106.html?ru=yahoo?mod=yahoo_itp

You going to get a lot of One's on this one. Point is I don't give a rats ####### if GWB started it or not. If he did he was wrong, Obama is wrong and it needs to stop.

We are losing our freedoms.

What I don't understand is that the very people who were so up in arms about it, now just shrug and say, "Bush started it". Ok Bush started it. he sucked. Now what.

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

*** Remember that when you quote a news article in the OP, the title of your thread should be the title of the article ****

Title of Article: Obama's Civil-Liberties Record Questioned

Thread Title: Obama's Civil Rights Violations finally being questioned

Let the double standards roll!

Edited June 7, 2013 by Mr. Big Dog

[decocker 7,198]

this is so twilight zone.

why did you all not have a problem with this under bush? because the purpose was honorable and carried out by honorable government to "fight terrorism"?

and what is the reason obama is continuing such surveillance? socialist muslim brotherhood world domniation? gotta get those fema camp guest lists going?

interesting.

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

this is so twilight zone.

why did you all not have a problem with this under bush? because the purpose was honorable and carried out by honorable government to "fight terrorism"?

and what is the reason obama is continuing such surveillance? socialist muslim brotherhood world domniation? gotta get those fema camp guest lists going?

interesting.

Wait for it. Nature Boy is going to be around and say: "A - Bush did it too"

[decocker 7,198]

Wait for it. Nature Boy is going to be around and say: "A - Bush did it too"

yeah - he already did. but i doubt he was against it under bush - not that it matters. because:

A. what's done is done

B. evil plan laugh

C. civil rights violation irony

[Ban Hammer 13,334]

Title of Article: Obama's Civil-Liberties Record Questioned

Thread Title: Obama's Civil Rights Violations finally being questioned

Let the double standards roll!

you know where to find the report button....don't expect moderation to have to read every thread.

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

but i doubt he was against it under bush.

Of course not. Conservatives then argued that only those that have something to hide would be against the righteous fight against the terrorists. This surveillance, they said, doesn't target good, law abiding Americans it protected them from teh evilz. Now that teh evilz have taken over the federal gubmint, however, this very same program is an outrage.

I thought it was wrong then, I think it is wrong now. But hey, I guess that just means that I've got something to hide, yes?

[We Keep Receipts 9,238]

I thought it was an invasion of privacy, but when GWB did it, I didn't hear anyone up in arms.

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

you know where to find the report button....don't expect moderation to have to read every thread.

Don't worry, I don't really have much of an expectation of the moderation at all aside from not being particularly impartial. That expectation is consistently fulfilled.

Report Button? You mean to tell me that our sissy crowd that supports the NRA hits the report button right about the same time that I hit the "Submit Post" button on an NRA post? They've got mighty thin skin, yes?

[GandD 5,966]

The entire Patriot act is a huge POS. it needs to be gone/changed if Obama wants to scale down the war on terror.

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

I thought it was an invasion of privacy, but when GWB did it, I didn't hear anyone up in arms.

Only traitors were up in arms about it then.

[decocker 7,198]

Only traitors were up in arms about it then.

proud traitor here.

[The Nature Boy 4,224]

Title of Article: Obama's Civil-Liberties Record Questioned

Thread Title: Obama's Civil Rights Violations finally being questioned

Let the double standards roll!

For God's sake man. Someone please take that Adverb out of that title so we can get back on GZ and Guns.

New title-- Use of Adverb in news title sparks congressional investigation in VJ mod practices. .

I thought it was an invasion of privacy, but when GWB did it, I didn't hear anyone up in arms.

You must have been deaf. What *&%% difference does it make if GWb started it. It's wrong then and it's wrong now .

It blows my mind that so many of you people claim to be for civil liberties but all you can say is .....Bush did it to".

this is so twilight zone.

why did you all not have a problem with this under bush? because the purpose was honorable and carried out by honorable government to "fight terrorism"?

and what is the reason obama is continuing such surveillance? socialist muslim brotherhood world domniation? gotta get those fema camp guest lists going?

interesting.

1

Only traitors were up in arms about it then.

1