Jump to content

22 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: Country: Australia
Timeline
Posted

I'm hoping what you are saying about CURRENT meaning all numbers get interviews is correct because based on the numbers, that's the only way I'm going to get an interview. My case number is 2990 :-( I'm in the Oceania region (Australia) too and I wish there were stats available on how many Oceania selectees end up getting visas. It's a painful wait until that final month.....

Filed: Other Country: Australia
Timeline
Posted

Hi Serac - from what I understand, they don't give out excess case numbers to create a second lottery, they just do it to ensure that all the numbers are filled. The fact that you've got that case number must mean that, in the past, they've had to go that high to fill all the visas (it also suggests to me that there must be quite a low rate of acceptance in Oceania). My understanding is that when it goes to Current, it's actually a good thing - it means that there is a visa number for all remaining applicants, if they pass their interview.

Filed: Country: Australia
Timeline
Posted

Hi Serac - from what I understand, they don't give out excess case numbers to create a second lottery, they just do it to ensure that all the numbers are filled. The fact that you've got that case number must mean that, in the past, they've had to go that high to fill all the visas (it also suggests to me that there must be quite a low rate of acceptance in Oceania). My understanding is that when it goes to Current, it's actually a good thing - it means that there is a visa number for all remaining applicants, if they pass their interview.

Well there were 562 visa issuances for the Oceania region out of 2000 selectees in the 2012 lottery so around 25-30% acceptance rate. Will be interesting to see whether this continues when the 2013 numbers are finally out. Based on previous year's numbers I must be right at the high end of the Oceania numbers though so I guess it'll really come down to the wire. So close but so far!

Filed: Other Country: Australia
Timeline
Posted

Sorry, my mistake, I've confused selectees and issuances.

On paper, that reads as a 25% chance, but really, I imagine it's higher. Much higher. If 125 000 people need to be selected to ensure issuance of 55 000 visas, then it must be the case that the majority of selectees don't qualify, or don't pursue the visa. For that reason, I wonder if comparing the number of selectees with the number of issuances is an accurate way to assess the odds. For example, I'd be less inclined to say "Only 500 out of 2000 selectees received the visa" than to say "It took 2000 selectees to find 500 selectees who were qualified, or still prepared to pursue the visa." Everything else about the application process has been characterised by care and caution, so it would surprise me if the US would announce a visa category had gone to current unless there were a visa number assigned to everybody. That doesn't mean everybody will get the visa - there may still be people remaining who are unqualified, or not willing to pursue it, as well as - and I assume this is most common - people who haven't got their paperwork and preparation in order, which means that the current period might expire before they can claim their number. Another user who's been really helpful on here told me of an African person she knew who received a number in the 90 000s. Apparently, this is very high for Africa - and probably higher, proportionally, than your number is for Oceania. But, when it finally came to current, he received his visa. So yeah...I've been agonising over it too, but I think the simplest and most accurate thing to do is to assume that when it goes to current, you will receive an interview. That's what I'm going to do.

  • 7 months later...
Filed: Timeline
Posted

Hi everyone - can I just say this was a huge help. I'm well behind as I only just logged in and discovered that I was selected, with a case number in the 1900's and had no idea what that meant. Great to have people on here sharing their knowledge and experiences!

 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...