Jump to content

93 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: Country: China
Timeline
Posted

do you agree with coulter, then? the widow should be in jail simply for wearing hijab?

she should be jailed if she is in any way implicated or shown to be complicit in the act of or the planning for, which can take you farther down the rabbit hole than you imagine, in a legal sense.

why do you think they are looking for this misha guy? so they can feed him a cupcake?

btw, misha ia a feminine name in the culture in question. perhaps another hidden identity behind a female personage, as seems popular lately in the jihad crowd.

personally, i think she should be counseled for her stupidity in getting mixed up with this bunch of ...what did biden call them?

____________________________________________________________________________

obamasolyndrafleeced-lmao.jpg

Posted

she should be jailed if she is in any way implicated or shown to be complicit in the act of or the planning for, which can take you farther down the rabbit hole than you imagine, in a legal sense.

why do you think they are looking for this misha guy? so they can feed him a cupcake?

btw, misha ia a feminine name in the culture in question. perhaps another hidden identity behind a female personage, as seems popular lately in the jihad crowd.

personally, i think she should be counseled for her stupidity in getting mixed up with this bunch of ...what did biden call them?

That's not what Coulter said. She said she doesn't care if she knows anything or not, she should be put into prison for wearing a hijab.

Why are you focusing on everything but that quote, which is what we're talking about?

Posted

she should be jailed if she is in any way implicated or shown to be complicit in the act of or the planning for, which can take you farther down the rabbit hole than you imagine, in a legal sense.

why do you think they are looking for this misha guy? so they can feed him a cupcake?

btw, misha ia a feminine name in the culture in question. perhaps another hidden identity behind a female personage, as seems popular lately in the jihad crowd.

personally, i think she should be counseled for her stupidity in getting mixed up with this bunch of ...what did biden call them?

i didn't ask for any of that. i asked if you agree with coulter's assertion that the widow should be jailed for wearing hijab.

I don’t care if she knew about this,” Coulter told Sean Hannity, the host of the Fox News show. “She ought to be in prison for wearing a hijab.”
Posted

First, we need to have a tighter control on welfare payments in all forms, both to immigrants and natives. If our welfare is something that people strive for, we're doing it wrong. Second, we need to be more willing to kick criminals out. Violent felons should be deported and never allowed back. If they sneak back in, we should treat them as invaders.

:thumbs:

Filed: Country: China
Timeline
Posted

That's not what Coulter said. She said she doesn't care if she knows anything or not, she should be put into prison for wearing a hijab.

Why are you focusing on everything but that quote, which is what we're talking about?

you may lack the cultural conceptions to be able to understand coulter's actual intended meaning. coulter appears to be, in this case, referring to her "wearing a hijab" as symbolic of her anti-American sentiment, which is assumed by her inclusion in and acceptance of radicalized islam, which requires one to be anti-American, by definition. hence, sympathy and idealogical assimilation is part and parcel to participation in and shared culpability in, if not in this specific incident, in spirit and extraneous incident(s). accessory before the fact is a serious crime, generally punishable in the same degree as the overt act in relation to.

____________________________________________________________________________

obamasolyndrafleeced-lmao.jpg

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: India
Timeline
Posted

Ann might be right, might be wrong – that’s her opinion but when immigration is talked about it needs to be taken in consideration that in old times when ppl used to migrate to US they were looking for brighter future and for that lot of them were willing to work hard.

Now days we have lot of ppl who come to US with thought of vengeance and revenge and with expectation they should be given things for free.

Atleast from wht I have observed the mind set of immigrants has changed.

Posted (edited)

you may lack the cultural conceptions to be able to understand coulter's actual intended meaning. coulter appears to be, in this case, referring to her "wearing a hijab" as symbolic of her anti-American sentiment, which is assumed by her inclusion in and acceptance of radicalized islam, which requires one to be anti-American, by definition. hence, sympathy and idealogical assimilation is part and parcel to participation in and shared culpability in, if not in this specific incident, in spirit and extraneous incident(s). accessory before the fact is a serious crime, generally punishable in the same degree as the overt act in relation to.

One of the most ridiculous things I've ever read.

As far as anyone's found out, this woman knew nothing about her husband's radical views. How can you say she's "accepted radicalized Islam"?

Edited by Evylin
Posted

you may lack the cultural conceptions to be able to understand coulter's actual intended meaning. coulter appears to be, in this case, referring to her "wearing a hijab" as symbolic of her anti-American sentiment, which is assumed by her inclusion in and acceptance of radicalized islam, which requires one to be anti-American, by definition. hence, sympathy and idealogical assimilation is part and parcel to participation in and shared culpability in, if not in this specific incident, in spirit and extraneous incident(s). accessory before the fact is a serious crime, generally punishable in the same degree as the overt act in relation to.

the cultural conceptions.. :lol:

Posted

So you would be ok if you were throwed out by Somali cabbie coz you were carrying alcohol in your bag?

If the cab driver had rules and those rules were broken, I'd have no issues with it. Just because someone comes from a different country doesn't absolve us from being right or wrong.

“Hate is too great a burden to bear. It injures the hater more than it injures the hated.” – Coretta Scott King

"Oppressive language does more than represent violence; it is violence; does more than represent the limits of knowledge; it limits knowledge." -Toni Morrison

He who passively accepts evil is as much involved in it as he who helps to perpetrate it.

Martin Luther King, Jr.

President-Obama-jpg.jpg

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Canada
Timeline
Posted (edited)

We need to have a poll. It will be a yes or no answer to "Are all Muslims exempt from any criticism or blame for anything ever." Any one that checks yes can be noted for this discussion. That way we'll have a record of whoever it is that keeps getting discussed.

Oh and right after that we need another yes or no poll to "Are all Muslims terrorists?" The Yes voters on this should also be discussed accordingly.

Edited by GandD
 
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...