Jump to content
Mr. Big Dog

Austerity policies driven by calculation error

 Share

39 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: Timeline

oops.

‘Austerity measures in Europe are due to an Excel error’

One of the academic papers supporting the austerity policies is being questioned after several mistakes were found in its Excel calculations, writes i.

Presented in 2010 by Harvard economists Carmen Reinhart and Kenneth Rogoff, the study “Growth in a time of debt” claims that countries with debt ratios above 90 per cent of GDP suffer a yearly 0.1 per cent contraction in their economies.

The Lisbon daily recalls that Nobel prize winner Paul Krugman considers this paper one of the pillars of the “intellectual building of the austerity economy.” Now, another team of economists found out that countries with the quoted debt ratio grew 2.2 per cent, only 1 per cent less than nations with lower debt ratios.

The mistake? Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, and Denmark had been accidentally excluded from a sum in their Excel spreadsheet.

Influential Reinhart-Rogoff Pro-Austerity Research Riddled With Errors: Study

Influential research by U.S. economists Carmen Reinhart and Ken Rogoff, touted by policymakers pushing government austerity in the United States and Europe, is riddled with errors, a bombshell new academic study claims.

The findings may not have much impact on the debate over government debt, and it probably won't cause those who have spent the past several decades panicking over government debt to stop their panicking. But it seriously erodes the intellectual underpinnings of the pro-austerity argument -- and makes the damage done by austerity in Europe and the U.S. in recent years all the more poignant.

"This is a mistake that has had enormous consequences," wrote Dean Baker of the Center for Economic and Policy Research. "If facts mattered in economic policy debates, this should be the cause for a major reassessment of the deficit reduction policies being pursued in the United States and elsewhere."

The new paper, by Thomas Herndon, Michael Ash, and Robert Pollin of the University of Massachusetts, Amherst, set out to reconstruct the findings of an influential 2010 paper by Reinhart and Rogoff, called "Growth In A Time Of Debt." Reinhart and Rogoff, of the University of Maryland and Harvard, respectively, claimed that economic growth slowed fairly dramatically for countries whose public debt crossed a threshold of 90 percent of gross domestic product.

The problem is that other economists have been unable to recreate Reinhart and Rogoff's findings. Herndon, Ash and Pollin now say they were able to do so -- but only by leaving out big, important pieces of data.

Using the same spreadsheet that Reinhart and Rogoff used for their research, Herndon, Ash and Pollin found that "Growth In A Time Of Debt" was built around a handful of significant errors. Correcting for those errors changes the findings dramatically: Average GDP growth for high-debt countries jumps from negative 0.1 percent to 2.2 percent.

The most important error appears to be a failure to include years of data that showed Australia, Canada and New Zealand enjoying high economic growth and high debt at the same time. Including all the years of data boosts New Zealand's average economic growth rate under high debt to 2.58 percent, from negative 7.6 percent. Given the small amount of data used in Reinhart and Rogoff's study, this has a huge impact on the overall findings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Brazil
Timeline

This has nothing to do with the topic at hand. Please open your own thread if you want to discuss this. I asked the mods to remove this post from my thread.

one post unrelated to the op split into its own topic.

* ~ * Charles * ~ *
 

I carry a gun because a cop is too heavy.

 

USE THE REPORT BUTTON INSTEAD OF MESSAGING A MODERATOR!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (pnd) Country: Ireland
Timeline

How long before those advocating blunt austerity admit they have gotten it wrong?

By Edward Krudy

NEW YORK (Reuters) - When Thomas Herndon, a student at the University of Massachusetts Amherst's doctoral program in economics, spotted possible errors made by two eminent Harvard economists in an influential research paper, he called his girlfriend over for a second look.

As they pored over the spreadsheets Herndon had requested from Harvard's Carmen Reinhart andKenneth Rogoff, which formed the basis for a widely quoted 2010 study, they spotted what they believed were glaring errors.

"I almost didn't believe my eyes when I saw just the basic spreadsheet error," said Herndon, 28. "I was like, am I just looking at this wrong? There has to be some other explanation. So I asked my girlfriend, 'Am I seeing this wrong?'"

His girlfriend, Kyla Walters, replied: "I don't think so, Thomas."

In the world of economic luminaries, it doesn't get much bigger than Reinhart and Rogoff, whose work has had enormous influence in one of the biggest economic policy debates of the age.

Both have served at the International Monetary Fund. Reinhart was a chief economist at investment bank Bear Stearns in the 1980s, while Rogoff worked at the Federal Reserve, passing through Yale and MIT before landing at Harvard.

Their study, which found economic growth slows dramatically when a government's debt exceeds 90 percent of a country's annual economic output, has been cited by policymakers around the world as justification for slashing spending.

Former U.S. vice presidential candidate Paul Ryan, a Republican congressman from Wisconsin, is one influential politician who has cited the report to justify a budget slashing agenda.

Using the two professors' data, Herndon found that instead of a dramatic fall in growth, the decline was much milder, slowing to about 2.2 percent, instead of the slump to minus 0.1 percent that Reinhart and Rogoff predicted.

http://news.yahoo.co...--business.html

Oct 19, 2010 I-130 application submitted to US Embassy Seoul, South Korea

Oct 22, 2010 I-130 application approved

Oct 22, 2010 packet 3 received via email

Nov 15, 2010 DS-230 part 1 faxed to US Embassy Seoul

Nov 15, 2010 Appointment for visa interview made on-line

Nov 16, 2010 Confirmation of appointment received via email

Dec 13, 2010 Interview date

Dec 15, 2010 CR-1 received via courier

Mar 29, 2011 POE Detroit Michigan

Feb 15, 2012 Change of address via telephone

Jan 10, 2013 I-751 packet mailed to Vermont Service CenterJan 15, 2013 NOA1

Jan 31, 2013 Biometrics appointment letter received

Feb 20, 2013 Biometric appointment date

June 14, 2013 RFE

June 24, 2013 Responded to RFE

July 24, 2013 Removal of conditions approved

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How long before those advocating blunt austerity admit they have gotten it wrong?

and he called his girlfriend over to confirm. :rofl::rofl::rofl:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Timeline
How long before those advocating blunt austerity admit they have gotten it wrong?

Amazing what huge damage an small calculation error can cause, isn't it? This was already posted, by the way...

http://www.visajourney.com/forums/topic/425613-austerity-policies-driven-by-calculation-error/page__view__findpost__p__6163987

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Brazil
Timeline

Amazing what huge damage an small calculation error can cause, isn't it? This was already posted, by the way...

http://www.visajourney.com/forums/topic/425613-austerity-policies-driven-by-calculation-error/page__view__findpost__p__6163987

duplicates have been merged

* ~ * Charles * ~ *
 

I carry a gun because a cop is too heavy.

 

USE THE REPORT BUTTON INSTEAD OF MESSAGING A MODERATOR!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

why is that funny?

As Jerry Clower use to say.... If you have to ask you already know

one post unrelated to the op split into its own topic.

ROFL at Mr. Big Dog... Mods... can't live with them... can't live without them..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As Jerry Clower use to say.... If you have to ask you already know

come on guy, it's no fun if you don't play along..

and i don't get what you found funny, although i do know the art of proof reading is often lost on you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

come on guy, it's no fun if you don't play along..

and i don't get what you found funny, although i do know the art of proof reading is often lost on you.

A. we are so passed anybody caring about my lack of spell check and proof reading.. It is a given

B. The funny part is he called a chick to check math :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

come on guy, it's no fun if you don't play along..

and i don't get what you found funny, although i do know the art of proof reading is often lost on you.

A. we are so passed anybody caring about my lack of spell check and proof reading.. It is a given

B. The funny part is he called a chick to check math :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

B. The funny part is he called a chick to check math :)

atta boy

the real funny part is, the source of the error and the fools who've been hollering austerity pretty much blindly..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A. we are so passed anybody caring about my lack of spell check and proof reading.. It is a given

B. The funny part is he called a chick to check math :)

Yeah admit it or not though we're (dudes) are often better off with a chick around to straighten up our math. Just sayin'

 

i don't get it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...