OBAMA THROWS A FIT

[mota bhai 2,675]

yah. harry is expected to shelf the rest of the liberal wet dream tommorrow. but, for know .

for now, yes. they're moving on to an internet sales tax which i (unfortunately) expect to see bipartisan approval of.

[Harsh_77 718]

Who said that?

That’s exactly you are implying with the support to the additional gun control measure. There are enough laws in place already, if they are followed than there is no need for any additional new law.

Why did current administration choose to have case against a handful ppl who tried to buy the gun illegally?

If they are so serious and really cared about the families of the victim, that should had been the goal to prosecute each and every case where someone tried to purchase a weapon when they were not eligible.

[I AM NOT THAT GUY 5,715]

Not if there's no actual threat to their gun rights, no.

There is Bloomberg and all his money, and SCOTUS as of late.

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

lol...even you know he uses children and victims around him and in background to win general public sympathy and support, do you know who else was using this same strategy?

Has it ever occurred to you that these parents WANTED to be there to have their voices heard? To stand up for what they believe is the right thing to do? Of course not. Cause you can't even begin to fathom what these parents and families are going through. You can only make infantile, insulting remarks about these people. You're pathetic.

[Penny Lane 8,159]

That’s exactly you are implying with the support to the additional gun control measure. There are enough laws in place already, if they are followed than there is no need for any additional new law.

Why did current administration choose to have case against a handful ppl who tried to buy the gun illegally?

If they are so serious and really cared about the families of the victim, that should had been the goal to prosecute each and every case where someone tried to purchase a weapon when they were not eligible.

We're waiting to hear who you were comparing Obama to in your previous post. Please tell us.

[mota bhai 2,675]

There is Bloomberg and all his money, and SCOTUS as of late.

I can't stand Bloomberg. I'm pleased to hear that he will use his money to influence the gun debate, but I really can't stand him.

[Darnell 8,478]

Could have fooled me with comments like these...

cool ! you've been fooled, and I win ! Yay !

One doesn't need to be a gun nut to purchase weapons.

My apologies to you, since you have missed that distinction.

Or should I be upset, instead of apologetic? I think it's a waste of time, truly, for me to be upset with your decisions; thankfully none of your decisions affect me or my mileau (sp..)

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

That’s exactly you are implying with the support to the additional gun control measure.

Bull. Contrary to the paranoid lies that the NRA has fed into your empty skull, there was no infringement of gun owner rights in this legislation.

[I AM NOT THAT GUY 5,715]

I can't stand Bloomberg. I'm pleased to hear that he will use his money to influence the gun debate, but I really can't stand him.

Allies are where you find them: The enemy of my enemy and all that.

[himher 634]

So, you think the gun nutters will eventually attempt a coup, once they get all the firepower they think they will need?

That is as likely as an attempt to take or ban the guns they have.

Which is the point.

[decocker 7,198]

People who support background checks CAN ALSO prosecute the illegal buyers that the background checks identify.

But they don't. They just support more background checks.

yeah, would be nice huh. i kinda feel the same way about kingpins. but hey, jails are full - bursting at the seams.

would be nice if we could at minimum, make it difficult for people attempting to purchase a gun under false pretenses, at the time of the transaction. crazy i know..

[Penny Lane 8,159]

yeah, would be nice huh. i kinda feel the same way about kingpins. but hey, jails are full - bursting at the seams.

would be nice if we could at minimum, make it difficult for people attempting to purchase a gun under false pretenses, at the time of the transaction. crazy i know..

You're just trying to strip people of their freedoms.

[himher 634]

Bull. Contrary to the paranoid lies that the NRA has fed into your empty skull, there was no infringement of gun owner rights in this legislation.

Well it's still good to give the libs the proverbial finger from time to time anyway, infringement or not.

Just to remind them of their, well, impotence.

[Harsh_77 718]

We're waiting to hear who you were comparing Obama to in your previous post. Please tell us.

They is Obama and his group... so u understand now.

[GandD 5,966]

So....... why again can't you use specific examples of gun violence to support gun control? Does that mean gun advocates can't use specific examples of when someone saved another's life with a gun?

I just want to be clear on what parts of the argument aren't allowed to be used.