OBAMA THROWS A FIT

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

The NRA doesn't have near the power and clout of the 40,000,000 non-member gun owning HOUSEHOLDS. Those are the people who spoke and the people who want to expand unenforced laws may be a majority but they are not a 60-40 majority and certainly won't get this through the house anyway.

Live with that, stop complaining about it, and figure out a way to control criminals - not the constitutionally protected tools they use to commit the crimes.

Most of those 40,000,000 households supports universal background checks. And those will come. The minority of Senators can ignore 90% of Americans for awhile but there are going to be consequences to that. It'll take time but it'll happen. I'm not worried.

[himher 634]

Most of those 40,000,000 households supports universal background checks. And those will come. The minority of Senators can ignore 90% of Americans for awhile but there are going to be consequences to that. It'll take time but it'll happen. I'm not worried.

That's what y'all say every few years since the 70's and we keep expanding people's freedom of self-defense. Hell even Washington DC, the democratic powerhouse, is open to gun ownership then we nailed Illinois the President's home state. I'm a lot less worried than you are. You really showed us didn't you? 90% my a$$. You don't know the first thing about what gun-owning households support or don't support.

Edited April 20, 2013 by himher

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

90% my a$$.

Here, you're #######. Handed to you.

• Washington Post-ABC News poll, April 11-14, 2013: "Would you support or oppose a law requiring background checks on people buying guns at gun shows or online?" Support: 86 percent. Oppose: 13 percent.

• CNN/Opinion Research Corp. poll, April 5-7, 2013: "Some proposals would require a background check on anyone attempting to purchase a gun in order to determine whether the prospective buyer has been convicted of a felony or has a mental health problem. Please tell me whether you would favor or oppose a background check for a prospective gun buyer under each of the following circumstances. ... If the buyer is trying to purchase a gun at a gun show." Favor: 83 percent. Oppose: 17 percent.

"If the buyer is trying to purchase a gun from another person who is not a gun dealer but owns one or more guns and wants to sell one of them." Favor: 70 percent. Oppose: 29 percent.

"If the buyer is purchasing a gun from a family member or receiving it as a gift." Favor: 54 percent. Oppose: 45 percent.

"Please tell me whether you would favor or oppose a background check for anyone who wants to buy ammunition for a gun." Favor: 55 percent. Oppose: 44 percent.

• Quinnipiac University poll, March 26-April 1, 2013. "Do you support or oppose requiring background checks for all gun buyers?" Support: 91 percent. Oppose: 8 percent.

• CBS News poll, March 20-24, 2013. "Would you favor or oppose background checks on all potential gun buyers?" Favor: 90 percent. Oppose: 8 percent.

[himher 634]

Here, you're #######. Handed to you.

Yeah. Here's yours - handed to you

http://www.wnd.com/2013/04/bang-senate-shoots-down-gun-control/

Now go suck wind

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

Yeah. Here's yours - handed to you

http://www.wnd.com/2013/04/bang-senate-shoots-down-gun-control/

Now go suck wind

The World Nut Daily. Why am I not surprised?

[himher 634]

The World Nut Daily. Why am I not surprised?

OK I'll hand it to you from any news source. (No wonder you're so butthurt). There are thousands of these btw

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/04/17/background-check-plan-in-trouble-as-dems-call-votes-on-gun-bill/

http://www.cnn.com/2013/04/17/politics/senate-guns-vote

http://www.usnews.com/news/blogs/Ken-Walshs-Washington/2013/04/18/obamas-anger-over-senate-gun-control-vote-reflects-sting-of-defeat

Edited April 20, 2013 by himher

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

OK I'll hand it to you from any news source. (No wonder you're so butthurt). There are thousands of these btw

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/04/17/background-check-plan-in-trouble-as-dems-call-votes-on-gun-bill/

http://www.cnn.com/2013/04/17/politics/senate-guns-vote

http://www.usnews.com/news/blogs/Ken-Walshs-Washington/2013/04/18/obamas-anger-over-senate-gun-control-vote-reflects-sting-of-defeat

Oh, I thought you were actually going to present some data on the level or lack of support that households with guns show for universal background checks. Seemed to me that you wanted to dispute that most of these households support that. But I guess you are all hat no cattle like on that other claim in the other thread that you can't back up either.

[ready4ONE 5,400]

I love how in the same breath gun nuts rejoice over their great victory, gloat pathetically to be more precise, they follow up with how demonstrably unsure of themselves they are by pointing out rising gun sales.

[himher 634]

Oh, I thought you were actually going to present some data on the level or lack of support that households with guns show for universal background checks. Seemed to me that you wanted to dispute that most of these households support that. But I guess you are all hat no cattle like on that other claim in the other thread that you can't back up either.

Liberal logic: It's more important to hand you your ####### in the polls than to hand you your ####### in the congress and the courts

I love liberal logic.

Unfortunately, you didn't actually hand me anything. Because it's exactly the way it was before the poll.

Edited April 20, 2013 by himher

[himher 634]

I love how in the same breath gun nuts rejoice over their great victory, gloat pathetically to be more precise, they follow up with how demonstrably unsure of themselves they are by pointing out rising gun sales.

I love how in the same breath libs boast about the big crackdowns resulting from background checks then follow up by not prosecuting anyone

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

Liberal logic: It's more important to hand you your ####### in the polls than to hand you your ####### in the congress and the courts

I love liberal logic.

Unfortunately, you didn't actually hand me anything. Because it's exactly the way it was before the poll.

Again, a short sentence would have sufficed. You're talking out of your ####### and cannot back up a single claim you make. That's all you gotta say. Really.

[himher 634]

Again, a short sentence would have sufficed. You're talking out of your ####### and cannot back up a single claim you make. That's all you gotta say. Really.

The only claim in this thread is that Obama and his supporters are throwing fits because they lost. Which you demonstrate nicely with your tantrums.

There is no win or lose here. You lost. Again, live with it.

Edited April 20, 2013 by himher

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

The only claim in this thread is that Obama and his supporters are throwing fits because they lost. Which you demonstrate nicely with your tantrums.

There is no win or lose here. You lost. Again, live with it.

Did ya get yer little feelings hurt? Sorry.

Oh, and if there's no win or lose, then how can I lose?

[himher 634]

Did ya get yer little feelings hurt? Sorry.

Oh, and if there's no win or lose, then how can I lose?

Point: You already lost. In congress. In the courts. Anything (from you) beyond that is just noise. I'm hearing :cry: :cry:

Edited April 20, 2013 by himher

[himher 634]

http://www.gunssavelife.com/?p=7125&utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=tempers-flare-may-issue-went-down-hard

OH just to slap you around a little more the "may issue" law in Illinois went down in flames in favor of a "shall issue" state concealed carry permit law.

Where's the public outrage? Can't we find some outrage in the President's home state?

Edited April 20, 2013 by himher